They always troll. That's the pointemeraldrafael said:I think at this point they're just picking their battles and hiding behind the shield of "protecting the first amendment and right to free speech".
They are definitely trolling at this point.
I don't know the details either but yeah there was a huge controversy going on about if "anon went too far" followed by a big "nah". Basicly anon ruined this girl's life by posting online some shit about her and making it public, resulting in her suicide.XxRyanxX said:..Well, I feel bad now- Because in truth I do not know that case. If I may ask, why did the girl suicide? Didn't even come to mind, but you're right- it's not always the case I assume.. Mm.sergnb said:Not always the case. Remember that girl that suicided because of /b/. Yeah.XxRyanxX said:I see them trying to do what they feel is justified and yet it is considered 'illegal'. Personally, to me.. I feel that they use good intentions in the wrong way. A good example is that they are attacking Sony by hacking into their websites (bad) while the reason is because they feel that they are ripping off their customers and restrict to much of the user's abilities to do whatever they want with the console they bought (good).
Sometimes, people do things for the right reasons but their methods of doing so can be seen as bad. Take the Green Hornet for example. They (the two main heroes) act like bad guys and do some destructive stuff, but it's for the good of the people to protect them. So I would call Anonymous 'rational heroes'. Just my opinion is all.. or to simply put: They do what they feel is right even if it's not done in a good peaceful manner.
Aaalso I remember the attack to the Epilepsy Foundation forum and other similar websites. They hacked them and introduced flash animations with epilepsy inducing patterns. Good intention? hell no. Hillarious? Well if you are kind of a sick sonofabitch like I am, yes, indeed it wassergnb said:I don't know the details either but yeah there was a huge controversy going on about if "anon went too far" followed by a big "nah". Basicly anon ruined this girl's life by posting online some shit about her and making it public, resulting in her suicide.XxRyanxX said:..Well, I feel bad now- Because in truth I do not know that case. If I may ask, why did the girl suicide? Didn't even come to mind, but you're right- it's not always the case I assume.. Mm.sergnb said:Not always the case. Remember that girl that suicided because of /b/. Yeah.XxRyanxX said:I see them trying to do what they feel is justified and yet it is considered 'illegal'. Personally, to me.. I feel that they use good intentions in the wrong way. A good example is that they are attacking Sony by hacking into their websites (bad) while the reason is because they feel that they are ripping off their customers and restrict to much of the user's abilities to do whatever they want with the console they bought (good).
Sometimes, people do things for the right reasons but their methods of doing so can be seen as bad. Take the Green Hornet for example. They (the two main heroes) act like bad guys and do some destructive stuff, but it's for the good of the people to protect them. So I would call Anonymous 'rational heroes'. Just my opinion is all.. or to simply put: They do what they feel is right even if it's not done in a good peaceful manner.
Well most anons ARE gamers, if not all of them. Yeah, age range 16-26 with no occupation but pure internet trollage and no social life at all... gotta be a gamer too!XxRyanxX said:..Well, that changes my views on them now. It seems that they are in favor of us- the Gamers, but if they are against something (even an innocent girl that they don't like something about her) then they'll attack nether the less. Makes me sad to hear she died, and I know this may sound off but- I would of loved to help her out. Wonder if Anonymous feels any guilt at all for doing that. I sure would of, but still, I can't see why they would humiliate her like that. It is the internet though, so no one should take it personally (yet we do depending on what it's based off of).sergnb said:I don't know the details either but yeah there was a huge controversy going on about if "anon went too far" followed by a big "nah". Basicly anon ruined this girl's life by posting online some shit about her and making it public, resulting in her suicide.XxRyanxX said:..Well, I feel bad now- Because in truth I do not know that case. If I may ask, why did the girl suicide? Didn't even come to mind, but you're right- it's not always the case I assume.. Mm.sergnb said:Not always the case. Remember that girl that suicided because of /b/. Yeah.XxRyanxX said:I see them trying to do what they feel is justified and yet it is considered 'illegal'. Personally, to me.. I feel that they use good intentions in the wrong way. A good example is that they are attacking Sony by hacking into their websites (bad) while the reason is because they feel that they are ripping off their customers and restrict to much of the user's abilities to do whatever they want with the console they bought (good).
Sometimes, people do things for the right reasons but their methods of doing so can be seen as bad. Take the Green Hornet for example. They (the two main heroes) act like bad guys and do some destructive stuff, but it's for the good of the people to protect them. So I would call Anonymous 'rational heroes'. Just my opinion is all.. or to simply put: They do what they feel is right even if it's not done in a good peaceful manner.
They kind of troll'd her because she was frigging stupid. Imagine your typical high school diva girl. Yeah, it's still horrible, but...Zetion said:My main issue with the post is that you implied that a collective group of people can feel "guilt". Killing youself because of /b/ is like killing youself becaue of /b/. Honestly, out of all the reasons to kill yourself, she selected the stupidest one =/XxRyanxX said:..Well, that changes my views on them now. It seems that they are in favor of us- the Gamers, but if they are against something (even an innocent girl that they don't like something about her) then they'll attack nether the less. Makes me sad to hear she died, and I know this may sound off but- I would of loved to help her out. Wonder if Anonymous feels any guilt at all for doing that. I sure would of, but still, I can't see why they would humiliate her like that. It is the internet though, so no one should take it personally (yet we do depending on what it's based off of).sergnb said:I don't know the details either but yeah there was a huge controversy going on about if "anon went too far" followed by a big "nah". Basicly anon ruined this girl's life by posting online some shit about her and making it public, resulting in her suicide.XxRyanxX said:..Well, I feel bad now- Because in truth I do not know that case. If I may ask, why did the girl suicide? Didn't even come to mind, but you're right- it's not always the case I assume.. Mm.sergnb said:Not always the case. Remember that girl that suicided because of /b/. Yeah.XxRyanxX said:I see them trying to do what they feel is justified and yet it is considered 'illegal'. Personally, to me.. I feel that they use good intentions in the wrong way. A good example is that they are attacking Sony by hacking into their websites (bad) while the reason is because they feel that they are ripping off their customers and restrict to much of the user's abilities to do whatever they want with the console they bought (good).
Sometimes, people do things for the right reasons but their methods of doing so can be seen as bad. Take the Green Hornet for example. They (the two main heroes) act like bad guys and do some destructive stuff, but it's for the good of the people to protect them. So I would call Anonymous 'rational heroes'. Just my opinion is all.. or to simply put: They do what they feel is right even if it's not done in a good peaceful manner.
Its been pointed out before, but a picture is obligitory.Daystar Clarion said:Cowards are what they are.
I'm pretty sure the vast majority of Anonymous wouldn't do a damn thing if they had to show up to a protest something in person.
I agree anon is more than /b/ and that there's a general misconception of them being a bunch of 40 year old basement dwelling pedos, but they never get taken seriously because they simply don't want to. Their motivation phrase is "do it for the lulz", what do you expect.SlasherX said:Anon is a generally good group that gets lumped in as /b/ and never gets taken seriously and is a called a group of pedos, they are good people who work to help your internets, also they are basically a neutral party so, yes they are good if you call people helping your internets and being neutral on a number of subjects good.