I did that to my players once. Towards the end of the last session, one of the party members had failed a save against a poison dart, but hadn't seen any effect from it. So the next session starts someplace completely different, and the scene changes are all very theatrical and surreal. Minor characters the party had never expected to encounter again show up where they couldn't possibly be and ask leading questions. Through the whole thing there's a sense of sickness and wrongness. And then after they beat the final obstacle...Gildan Bladeborn said:Turns out we had spent all that time hallucinating, heh.
That sounds awesome, and makes the fact that our "reward" was wrongful imprisonment for indecent acts against a pig all the more painful (don't ask, really).chepenoyo said:I did that to my players once. Of course everyone got full XP and it was one of the better sessions I've run, I think.Gildan Bladeborn said:Turns out we had spent all that time hallucinating, heh.
The criticism so far has been griping that the editing left too much in rather than just cutting to the good stuff, that it cut too much out, that it exploited boobs too much, and that it didn't show enough boobs. I think it's safe to say that whether or not the editor even reads these boards, they're choosing what changes to make them self.Panayjon said:I wonder if our constructive criticism was taken into account or if the editors realized some things along the way themselves?
I second that motion.Mariena said:Justine Jolie!
*swoon*
Right on! I kinda do the some thing for my group. I blend a mix of 2nd AD&D with 3.5, especially the monsters, magical items, and sometimes spells (more so the monsters). I have gotten used to converting the older monsters to 3.5 and sometimes (but rarely) 4ed too.mandymorbid said:We use a homebrew hybrid of AD&D and 3.5.