if halo 3 came to ps3 would u buy it?

Recommended Videos

NezumiiroKitsune

New member
Mar 29, 2008
979
0
0
Nah, my budgets too tight to allow me to spend money on games that I don't have any interest in whatsoever. I don't like FPS' to begin with, excluding Half Life 2 and Team Fortress 2. I be thinking Killzone is probably more fail, on account of its dreary sterileness. Resistance 2 was fun though I admit, preferred Resistance 1, but 2 had a fun story and some nice set pieces and as per usual epic Insomniac Weaponary.

Also why not Halo 1 and 2 as well? Since you need the back story to enjoy the 3rd story to the full, no?
 

GuerrillaClock

New member
Jul 11, 2008
1,367
0
0
How has this thread become hijacked into ANOTHER Killzone 2 flame war?
Oh, right, fanboys.

And for the record, there is not ONE criticism you can level at Halo that can't also be levelled at Killzone 2, so stop all this nonsense about how one is better than the other, because no-one with half a brain really cares, and it's irritating.
 

sleeperhit79

New member
Feb 6, 2009
74
0
0
no i rented it on 360 and couldn't finish the campaign cause the game seemed pretty unremarkable, had a weird feel to it and I just couldn't get over the whole "pew pew" feel of the guns, and honestly I'm not too much into online shooting games(killzone is the first competitive shooter that's gotten my attention for this long.). I'm sure people love it for a reason, but just not my cup of tea.
 

Vlane

New member
Sep 14, 2008
1,996
0
0
I own a better FPS for the PS3, I already played through Halo 3 and I own CSS. So no I have plenty of other better FPS's.
 

gorillaZboy64

New member
Mar 18, 2009
3
0
0
welll i have halo 3 and if i had a ps3 than yes. people criticize the game because its so popular. hell even zero punctuation said it was ok which is a lot comin from a guy like him
 

oliveira8

New member
Feb 2, 2009
4,726
0
0
Mazty said:
oliveira8 said:
Mazty said:
DemonI81 said:
Don't waste your breath man, this dude's all over the threads about the PS3, or video game consoles, and spewing fanboy BS out all over the place.
You can't reason with fanboys, just make them look like the morons they are then ignore them when they throw a hissy fit like a 2 year old who's mom wont buy them a candy bar.
Show how I'm a fanboy and abandon logic for irrational reasoning then. Until then keep your ignorant views to yourself.
You said that a story involving Space wars is realistic.

Band of Brothers is realistic cause its based in real facts.

Killzone is a Sci-Fi story which brings inspirations from colonial Wars and WW2, but in space. Is space wars real these days? Dont call it realistic call it a good Sci-Fi story. Which what it is a Science fiction story cause its fiction based on current or future speculations of technology and science.
Band of Brothers is a colaberation of true stories, a historical re-enactment of past events.
According to science fiction writer Robert A. Heinlein, "a handy short definition of almost all science fiction might read: realistic speculation about possible future events, based solidly on adequate knowledge of the real world, past and present, and on a thorough understanding of the nature and significance of the scientific method."

Killzone doesn't have any whacky magic or nonsense in it. Guns. Bullets. Lots of bodies. Seems to be realisitic speculation, and considering it's not based on Earth, seems about right. Because of that Killzone 2 is realisitc, but not reality. Two distinct things.
So cause its not based in Earth it makes it more realistic? Cause neither is Star Wars and last time I saw the premise "In a Galaxy far far away and a long time ago...". Its set in a galaxy far away that might not be ours and which Humans and Aliens exist togheter and some have phsycic powers? The same thing happens in Killzone 2 which is set in a harsh Alien(yes Alien! Cause if I remenber well the Helghast were kicked out of somewhere to that planet where they had to learn to survive.) world with acidic air,dust clouds, and violent surgical lightning storms.

Also if my memory serves correct the game starts with you being dropped from way above cloud level or at cloud level with no pressure capsules and being totally okay. no shortness of breath no nothing...realistic!
 

Fightbulb

New member
May 14, 2008
689
0
0
Man, look at this thread. And to think I used to believe this forum was mostly used by eloquent, unbiased gamers.

I hope that all of you will one day realize just how insanely retarded and utterly pointless these discussions are. Honestly, I hate being the dude who has to say this, but people, get a life.
 

oliveira8

New member
Feb 2, 2009
4,726
0
0
Mazty said:
oliveira8 said:
So cause its not based in Earth it makes it more realistic? Cause neither is Star Wars and last time I saw the premise "In a Galaxy far far away and a long time ago...". Its set in a galaxy far away that might not be ours and which Humans and Aliens exist togheter and some have phsycic powers? The same thing happens in Killzone 2 which is set in a harsh Alien(yes Alien! Cause if I remenber well the Helghast were kicked out of somewhere to that planet where they had to learn to survive.) world with acidic air,dust clouds, and violent surgical lightning storms.

Also if my memory serves correct the game starts with you being dropped from way above cloud level or at cloud level with no pressure capsules and being totally okay. no shortness of breath no nothing...realistic!
Physic powers = unrealistic
The Helghast were human, but the environment mutated them/they adapted to it, hence the masks etc. Hardly unrealistic. What would be unrealistic is expecting humans on another planet to stay exaclty the same as their origin planet.
Depends how high cloud level is, could be fine.
COuld you actually state why Killzone 2 is unrealistic. At the momement you're saying it's unrealistic because it's set in the future. That means if I write a story about events in a years time they immediatly are unrealistic. So how is K2 unrealistic?
Okay unrealistic cause you have spaceships capable of interstellar travel, orbital bombardements, like you said the planet mutated the Helgan yet does nothing for the ISA troops that "judging from what I briefly played" no helmets and no proper combat gear for that region. Hell and people say the USA lost Vietnam cause they the US troops were badly prepared and the US thought that the Vietcong army would opose little resistence...I guess those ISA dudes are masters in the art of War cause they lauch their troops into a planet unprepared for the planet itself.

And I can say Psychic powers may one day come true, depending on how we evolve the same way you can say the human race one day will have the ability to colonize space, and achieve interstellar travel.

And realistic derives from the word realism which means "concern for fact or reality and rejection of the impractical and visionary" acording to my Portuguse-English dictionary. Theres is a thing called Scientific realism that implies that someday some theorys we make(like Ligh Speed and space colonization.) may become true. Till then they are impractical and visionary.

The same goes for SW aliens and jedi powers.
 

sanzo

New member
Jan 21, 2009
472
0
0
No, but I don't play many FPSs to begin with... it's why I bought a ps3

Besides, and just my preference, FPSs are just better on a PC. There's just something about a mouse and keyboard that a controller can't match
 

Rush_Thores

New member
Oct 2, 2008
71
0
0
Breno said:
it seem people hate halo 3 just cause people with it always go on about how good it is i myself dont have a 360 but i love it and i would buy it if it came to ps3 would u?

me i would buy because of the theathar mode and forge which i just love being able to watch how u died or killed from any angle!

ofcourse there no chance of it happing

please keep in mind halo 3 made $1.2bil which no other game has done this generation (maybe even last generation) and is still the most played game on xbox live
First off, why am I supposed to keep in mind it sold so well? That suggests that getting a game because a million other people have makes you "cool", which a lot of people do sadly.

Wargamer, you need to stop humping resistance 2 and calling it a halo killer, it ain't. Halo, the mediocre game it is, is doing incredibly well, and if Resistance 2 didn't kill it at first, it wont over time.

Overall, no, even if it was a special FPS that does something innovative enough to actually interest me, still my answer is no, because the PS3 is worse at FPSs than the 360. Don't get me wrong, I've had my PS3 longer and most games I have are on it, but I hesitate buying FPSs on it because of the controller. Its the same reason I got Street Fighter 4 on the ps3 and not the 360 because of the 360s shitty d-pad. Yes, I'm spoiled enough that I have the luxury to make these decisions, but Halo would be an even worse experience on the PS3 andI find it hard to be compelling. Only because I did really enjoy the first one did I buy resistance 2, and Killzone 2 doesn't have to be a great shooter because it's so damn shiny and purdy to listen to.
 

oliveira8

New member
Feb 2, 2009
4,726
0
0
Mazty said:
oliveira8 said:
Okay unrealistic cause you have spaceships capable of interstellar travel, orbital bombardements, like you said the planet mutated the Helgan yet does nothing for the ISA troops that "judging from what I briefly played" no helmets and no proper combat gear for that region. Hell and people say the USA lost Vietnam cause they the US troops were badly prepared and the US thought that the Vietcong army would opose little resistence...I guess those ISA dudes are masters in the art of War cause they lauch their troops into a planet unprepared for the planet itself.

And I can say Psychic powers may one day come true, depending on how we evolve the same way you can say the human race one day will have the ability to colonize space, and achieve interstellar travel.

And realistic derives from the word realism which means "concern for fact or reality and rejection of the impractical and visionary" acording to my Portuguse-English dictionary. Theres is a thing called Scientific realism that implies that someday some theorys we make(like Ligh Speed and space colonization.) may become true. Till then they are impractical and visionary.

The same goes for SW aliens and jedi powers.
Interstella travel, about the distance from Earth to Mars is not unrealisitic. I should clarify that Killzone 2 is a realisitc Sci-Fi FPS as it takes the state of technology today and progresses it by a few hundred years, maybe less, without any whacky catalyst for antyhing (think Spice from the Dune series).
There is much more evidence that we will be able to fight planetary wars rather then move tea cups with our minds.
Granted the ISA don't have Helghan masks, but that's down to the changes having taken generations, and not immediate, so it can be pressumed the atmosphere only posses a long term threat.
How do you know we wont be able to move tea cups with our minds. The human brain only uses a very small part of its potencial.

Also 2001: A Space Odyssey according to you is a realistic film?