if you were in a war...

[SotheVolke]

what long ranged weapon would you have?

what melee weapon?

what armor?

what kind of terrain is there?

who would be the enemies?

how would you fight?

1) Long bow, because they look awesome!
2) Gotta be a pike...or some big ass spear
3) FULL SUIT OF MEDIEVEL ARMOUR
4) I dunno...we'll say a city siege?
5) ...The French?
6) HACK AND SLASHHH!!! Dynasty warriors style

 

[Wadders]

Napalm.

It does smell like victory, after all

 

[El Poncho]

Long range:Sniper Rifle of some sorts.
Melee: Swiss army knife xP
Armor: One that protects me?
terrainesert.
Enemy: Who ever has my god damn oil!

 

[Lazy Kitty]

long range: Nuke

melee: Nuke
armor: Nuke
terrain: Nuclear waste land

This, except for terrain something heavily populated, oh and for armor: something made out of lead, to protect myself against the radiation of my own nuke.

 

[Agent Larkin]

Spoiler: quoted

what long ranged weapon would you have?
An 18th century rifle.
what melee weapon?
A rapier, with its matching gauge.
what armor?
None, of course. I am a gentleman!
what kind of terrain is there?
How should I know? Being a gentleman I let the opponent choose the battlefield
who would be the enemies?
Ze French!
how would you fight? (stealth,up front,more long range,brawn,strategy)
Honourably.

is this guy Prussian

is that a question

Its a Napoleonic joke!

I see, care to elaborate? I always thought the British were that civil. But perhaps the Prussians were even more so of course.

Well the use of Ze automatically moves away from being British. Secondly the idea that the British would fight fare is a complete joke the semi suicidal nature of letting his opponent chose that battle field sounds very Prussian. Alot people have alot misconceptions about the British well outside of Europe.

Well said I suppose. Come to think of it, the British weren't too keen on letting the enemy choose the battle field, but as far as I have read, their officers did try and fight fair. Though, I got most to all of my information from a series of novels about the British private Richard Sharpe (by Bernard Cornwell, marvellous books). That guy might have been a bit biased.

Hmm so Prussian it is. Not bad I suppose. Even though they don't have green jackets.

Actual Prussian uniforms are black with silver of white trim they look quite evil in a ridiculously imperial way. And the Prussians had really good tactics for training troops just some of there nobles where nuts, like leading the charge first when your a baron is a bit odd. Also sharp is fairly historically inaccurate apart from northerners being good at fighting and the Voltaire quotes.

I suppose so. But in Cornwell's credit, he did have historical notes at the end of each book, noting assumptions, possible inaccuracies, or downright make belief happenings. At least they gave me a good first impression on the way wars were fought there. I always used to have a distaste for that time period, these books made me interested and actually made me like the game Empire: Total War.

There good books and the battles and tactics are fairly realistic just alot of the characters are unrealistic like every french man being evil.

Hey! Not every guy, remember that one guy in some march during the Peninsula war? I think he waved to Sharpe and shrugged or something. And there were others too, too bad my memory is so crappy. But I do recall some fair officers here and there.

Hmm Thats Major Richard Sharpe and The British always tried to choose the battlefield the Battle of Corunna is a good example.

You're very right about choosing the battlefield, didn't think that part through very well. And why Major? Why not Lt. Colonel? Or don't you consider those books part of the story (which I can't blame you for really)?

What I mean is there majority bad if you have any money in the sharp books your looking like your going to be evil on average.

Ill agree with you on average their evil but some of them aren't.

quite majority french people weren't evil at the time hell even Napoleon wasn't evil he just wanted to make his country strong and spread atheism, he dint kill civilians his army was not cruel or evil like Nazis just like wars at that time just bigger.

He personaly didnt kill civilians but have you forgotten Oporto?

 

[Drakulla]

I'd use the BFG with unlimited ammo and some ODST armnor plus some long range tactical nukes.

 

[JWAN]

what long ranged weapon would you have? M-14, .45 semi automatic, .300 Winchester http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M14, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M1911,

what melee weapon? Ka-Bar http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ka-Bar

what armor? Dragon skin covered in a flak jacket

what kind of terrain is there? any

who would be the enemies? Communists, Terrorists

how would you fight? M14 is multi-purpose, any range up to 1,000 meters you own, it also shoots AP and API rounds

 

[ShotgunSmoke]

Long range - G36C + Winchester W1200 and a Desert Eagle.

Melee - Machete

Armor is for pussies.

Terrain - City

Enemies - Evil Soviet troops.

How would I fight? - Run and Gun, occasionally taking cover.

 

[murphy7801]

Spoiler: quoted

what long ranged weapon would you have?
An 18th century rifle.
what melee weapon?
A rapier, with its matching gauge.
what armor?
None, of course. I am a gentleman!
what kind of terrain is there?
How should I know? Being a gentleman I let the opponent choose the battlefield
who would be the enemies?
Ze French!
how would you fight? (stealth,up front,more long range,brawn,strategy)
Honourably.

is this guy Prussian

is that a question

Its a Napoleonic joke!

I see, care to elaborate? I always thought the British were that civil. But perhaps the Prussians were even more so of course.

Well the use of Ze automatically moves away from being British. Secondly the idea that the British would fight fare is a complete joke the semi suicidal nature of letting his opponent chose that battle field sounds very Prussian. Alot people have alot misconceptions about the British well outside of Europe.

Well said I suppose. Come to think of it, the British weren't too keen on letting the enemy choose the battle field, but as far as I have read, their officers did try and fight fair. Though, I got most to all of my information from a series of novels about the British private Richard Sharpe (by Bernard Cornwell, marvellous books). That guy might have been a bit biased.

Hmm so Prussian it is. Not bad I suppose. Even though they don't have green jackets.

Actual Prussian uniforms are black with silver of white trim they look quite evil in a ridiculously imperial way. And the Prussians had really good tactics for training troops just some of there nobles where nuts, like leading the charge first when your a baron is a bit odd. Also sharp is fairly historically inaccurate apart from northerners being good at fighting and the Voltaire quotes.

I suppose so. But in Cornwell's credit, he did have historical notes at the end of each book, noting assumptions, possible inaccuracies, or downright make belief happenings. At least they gave me a good first impression on the way wars were fought there. I always used to have a distaste for that time period, these books made me interested and actually made me like the game Empire: Total War.

There good books and the battles and tactics are fairly realistic just alot of the characters are unrealistic like every french man being evil.

Hey! Not every guy, remember that one guy in some march during the Peninsula war? I think he waved to Sharpe and shrugged or something. And there were others too, too bad my memory is so crappy. But I do recall some fair officers here and there.

Hmm Thats Major Richard Sharpe and The British always tried to choose the battlefield the Battle of Corunna is a good example.

You're very right about choosing the battlefield, didn't think that part through very well. And why Major? Why not Lt. Colonel? Or don't you consider those books part of the story (which I can't blame you for really)?

What I mean is there majority bad if you have any money in the sharp books your looking like your going to be evil on average.

Ill agree with you on average their evil but some of them aren't.

quite majority french people weren't evil at the time hell even Napoleon wasn't evil he just wanted to make his country strong and spread atheism, he dint kill civilians his army was not cruel or evil like Nazis just like wars at that time just bigger.

He personaly didnt kill civilians but have you forgotten Oporto?

that was armed militia

 

[Agent Larkin]

Spoiler: quoted

what long ranged weapon would you have?
An 18th century rifle.
what melee weapon?
A rapier, with its matching gauge.
what armor?
None, of course. I am a gentleman!
what kind of terrain is there?
How should I know? Being a gentleman I let the opponent choose the battlefield
who would be the enemies?
Ze French!
how would you fight? (stealth,up front,more long range,brawn,strategy)
Honourably.

is this guy Prussian

is that a question

Its a Napoleonic joke!

I see, care to elaborate? I always thought the British were that civil. But perhaps the Prussians were even more so of course.

Well the use of Ze automatically moves away from being British. Secondly the idea that the British would fight fare is a complete joke the semi suicidal nature of letting his opponent chose that battle field sounds very Prussian. Alot people have alot misconceptions about the British well outside of Europe.

Well said I suppose. Come to think of it, the British weren't too keen on letting the enemy choose the battle field, but as far as I have read, their officers did try and fight fair. Though, I got most to all of my information from a series of novels about the British private Richard Sharpe (by Bernard Cornwell, marvellous books). That guy might have been a bit biased.

Hmm so Prussian it is. Not bad I suppose. Even though they don't have green jackets.

Actual Prussian uniforms are black with silver of white trim they look quite evil in a ridiculously imperial way. And the Prussians had really good tactics for training troops just some of there nobles where nuts, like leading the charge first when your a baron is a bit odd. Also sharp is fairly historically inaccurate apart from northerners being good at fighting and the Voltaire quotes.

I suppose so. But in Cornwell's credit, he did have historical notes at the end of each book, noting assumptions, possible inaccuracies, or downright make belief happenings. At least they gave me a good first impression on the way wars were fought there. I always used to have a distaste for that time period, these books made me interested and actually made me like the game Empire: Total War.

There good books and the battles and tactics are fairly realistic just alot of the characters are unrealistic like every french man being evil.

Hey! Not every guy, remember that one guy in some march during the Peninsula war? I think he waved to Sharpe and shrugged or something. And there were others too, too bad my memory is so crappy. But I do recall some fair officers here and there.

Hmm Thats Major Richard Sharpe and The British always tried to choose the battlefield the Battle of Corunna is a good example.

You're very right about choosing the battlefield, didn't think that part through very well. And why Major? Why not Lt. Colonel? Or don't you consider those books part of the story (which I can't blame you for really)?

What I mean is there majority bad if you have any money in the sharp books your looking like your going to be evil on average.

Ill agree with you on average their evil but some of them aren't.

quite majority french people weren't evil at the time hell even Napoleon wasn't evil he just wanted to make his country strong and spread atheism, he dint kill civilians his army was not cruel or evil like Nazis just like wars at that time just bigger.

He personaly didnt kill civilians but have you forgotten Oporto?

that was armed militia

No that was a fresh army from France of conscripts.

 

[murphy7801]

Spoiler: quoted

what long ranged weapon would you have?
An 18th century rifle.
what melee weapon?
A rapier, with its matching gauge.
what armor?
None, of course. I am a gentleman!
what kind of terrain is there?
How should I know? Being a gentleman I let the opponent choose the battlefield
who would be the enemies?
Ze French!
how would you fight? (stealth,up front,more long range,brawn,strategy)
Honourably.

is this guy Prussian

is that a question

Its a Napoleonic joke!

I see, care to elaborate? I always thought the British were that civil. But perhaps the Prussians were even more so of course.

Well the use of Ze automatically moves away from being British. Secondly the idea that the British would fight fare is a complete joke the semi suicidal nature of letting his opponent chose that battle field sounds very Prussian. Alot people have alot misconceptions about the British well outside of Europe.

Well said I suppose. Come to think of it, the British weren't too keen on letting the enemy choose the battle field, but as far as I have read, their officers did try and fight fair. Though, I got most to all of my information from a series of novels about the British private Richard Sharpe (by Bernard Cornwell, marvellous books). That guy might have been a bit biased.

Hmm so Prussian it is. Not bad I suppose. Even though they don't have green jackets.

Actual Prussian uniforms are black with silver of white trim they look quite evil in a ridiculously imperial way. And the Prussians had really good tactics for training troops just some of there nobles where nuts, like leading the charge first when your a baron is a bit odd. Also sharp is fairly historically inaccurate apart from northerners being good at fighting and the Voltaire quotes.

I suppose so. But in Cornwell's credit, he did have historical notes at the end of each book, noting assumptions, possible inaccuracies, or downright make belief happenings. At least they gave me a good first impression on the way wars were fought there. I always used to have a distaste for that time period, these books made me interested and actually made me like the game Empire: Total War.

There good books and the battles and tactics are fairly realistic just alot of the characters are unrealistic like every french man being evil.

Hey! Not every guy, remember that one guy in some march during the Peninsula war? I think he waved to Sharpe and shrugged or something. And there were others too, too bad my memory is so crappy. But I do recall some fair officers here and there.

Hmm Thats Major Richard Sharpe and The British always tried to choose the battlefield the Battle of Corunna is a good example.

You're very right about choosing the battlefield, didn't think that part through very well. And why Major? Why not Lt. Colonel? Or don't you consider those books part of the story (which I can't blame you for really)?

What I mean is there majority bad if you have any money in the sharp books your looking like your going to be evil on average.

Ill agree with you on average their evil but some of them aren't.

quite majority french people weren't evil at the time hell even Napoleon wasn't evil he just wanted to make his country strong and spread atheism, he dint kill civilians his army was not cruel or evil like Nazis just like wars at that time just bigger.

He personaly didnt kill civilians but have you forgotten Oporto?

that was armed militia

No that was a fresh army from France of conscripts.

Are talking about sharp or history hear ? because I was talking about the french capture of Oporto.

 

[Skeleon]

what long ranged weapon would you have?
A big sniper rifle.
what melee weapon?
A light sabre. Takes up very little space and is totally overpowered.
what armor?
A power armour with cloaking device.
what kind of terrain is there?
A blasted land of ash and despair.
who would be the enemies?
Something inhuman like aliens. Or something lame like vampires.
how would you fight? (stealth,up front,more long range,brawn,strategy)
Long, long range and stealthy. Like Duel: Enemy At The Gates.

 

[murphy7801]

Spoiler: quoted

what long ranged weapon would you have?
An 18th century rifle.
what melee weapon?
A rapier, with its matching gauge.
what armor?
None, of course. I am a gentleman!
what kind of terrain is there?
How should I know? Being a gentleman I let the opponent choose the battlefield
who would be the enemies?
Ze French!
how would you fight? (stealth,up front,more long range,brawn,strategy)
Honourably.

is this guy Prussian

is that a question

Its a Napoleonic joke!

I see, care to elaborate? I always thought the British were that civil. But perhaps the Prussians were even more so of course.

Well the use of Ze automatically moves away from being British. Secondly the idea that the British would fight fare is a complete joke the semi suicidal nature of letting his opponent chose that battle field sounds very Prussian. Alot people have alot misconceptions about the British well outside of Europe.

Well said I suppose. Come to think of it, the British weren't too keen on letting the enemy choose the battle field, but as far as I have read, their officers did try and fight fair. Though, I got most to all of my information from a series of novels about the British private Richard Sharpe (by Bernard Cornwell, marvellous books). That guy might have been a bit biased.

Hmm so Prussian it is. Not bad I suppose. Even though they don't have green jackets.

Actual Prussian uniforms are black with silver of white trim they look quite evil in a ridiculously imperial way. And the Prussians had really good tactics for training troops just some of there nobles where nuts, like leading the charge first when your a baron is a bit odd. Also sharp is fairly historically inaccurate apart from northerners being good at fighting and the Voltaire quotes.

I suppose so. But in Cornwell's credit, he did have historical notes at the end of each book, noting assumptions, possible inaccuracies, or downright make belief happenings. At least they gave me a good first impression on the way wars were fought there. I always used to have a distaste for that time period, these books made me interested and actually made me like the game Empire: Total War.

There good books and the battles and tactics are fairly realistic just alot of the characters are unrealistic like every french man being evil.

Hey! Not every guy, remember that one guy in some march during the Peninsula war? I think he waved to Sharpe and shrugged or something. And there were others too, too bad my memory is so crappy. But I do recall some fair officers here and there.

Hmm Thats Major Richard Sharpe and The British always tried to choose the battlefield the Battle of Corunna is a good example.

You're very right about choosing the battlefield, didn't think that part through very well. And why Major? Why not Lt. Colonel? Or don't you consider those books part of the story (which I can't blame you for really)?

What I mean is there majority bad if you have any money in the sharp books your looking like your going to be evil on average.

Ill agree with you on average their evil but some of them aren't.

quite majority french people weren't evil at the time hell even Napoleon wasn't evil he just wanted to make his country strong and spread atheism, he dint kill civilians his army was not cruel or evil like Nazis just like wars at that time just bigger.

He personaly didnt kill civilians but have you forgotten Oporto?

that was armed militia

No that was a fresh army from France of conscripts.

Are talking about sharp or history hear ? because I was talking about the french capture of Oporto.

 

[Toaster Hunter]

Long range- FN P90 weapon system

Backup weapon- Colt .45 pistol, preferably the 1911A1 though any variety will do

Melee- Sledgehammer

Armor- Dragon Skin covered with a gillie suit

Terrain- Any time, any place

Targets- Anyone and everyone

 

[Toaster Hunter]

I like your style

 

[xChevelle24]

what long ranged weapon would you have? Barrett .50 Calibre sniper rifle

what melee weapon? A bayonett or a swiss army knife or an M16

what armor? Kevlar? or something very light so I can move around

what kind of terrain is there? jungle.

who would be the enemies? Eh, sorry about this racism but Black people would be the enemies. Black people and wiggers vs. me

how would you fight? (stealth,up front,more long range,brawn,strategy) Obviously I would fight with stealth and long range

the weapons can be space agey just so you know. lightsabers,plasma blasters,laser watches. No. Just no.

 

[wordsmith]

c-c-c-c-collapse

quite majority french people weren't evil at the time hell even Napoleon wasn't evil he just wanted to make his country strong and spread atheism, he dint kill civilians his army was not cruel or evil like Nazis just like wars at that time just bigger.

Napoleon wasn't evil he just wanted to make his country strong and spread atheism, ..not cruel or evil like Nazis

Wait... You know what the point behind the Nazi regime was, right? To make Germany strong after they had been crippled by the Treaty of Versailles. To do this, they united the country, and one of the ways of doing that was to eradicate the major things that split the population, like racism (you can't be racist if there are no minority races), homophobia (no-one can be homophobic if there are no gay people) and religious disputes (again, one religion means no trouble).

Now, before I get jumped on with people saying "ZOMG u suport da natzis!!!!11!!!11one!", I don't. I think they had a sound PRINCIPLE (unify a country to take it from poverty and economical deflation into one of the worlds superpowers), but the way that they went about it was VERY WRONG.

 

[murphy7801]

c-c-c-c-collapse

quite majority french people weren't evil at the time hell even Napoleon wasn't evil he just wanted to make his country strong and spread atheism, he dint kill civilians his army was not cruel or evil like Nazis just like wars at that time just bigger.

Napoleon wasn't evil he just wanted to make his country strong and spread atheism, ..not cruel or evil like Nazis

Wait... You know what the point behind the Nazi regime was, right? To make Germany strong after they had been crippled by the Treaty of Versailles. To do this, they united the country, and one of the ways of doing that was to eradicate the major things that split the population, like racism (you can't be racist if there are no minority races), homophobia (no-one can be homophobic if there are no gay people) and religious disputes (again, one religion means no trouble).

Now, before I get jumped on with people saying "ZOMG u suport da natzis!!!!11!!!11one!", I don't. I think they had a sound PRINCIPLE (unify a country to take it from poverty and economical deflation into one of the worlds superpowers), but the way that they went about it was VERY WRONG.

I think you may have entirely missed the point napoleon was really nothing odd about in history it was just empireism/imperialism it was the done thing then all about more land to tax for money. Not genocide!

 

[TheFacelessOne]

Pssshh, I don't need weapons, when I have your MOM!

Sorry.

Anyways...

Weapons: BB GUN (With bonus Explosive Rounds)
Melee: Aveeno Bottle
Terrain: A toy store.
Enemies: 5-10 year olds. With chainguns.