Easykill post=18.74268.834336 said:
By the way, what's your stance on the internet? Will you kill Anonymous with your own hands to aid your own rise to power?
Ugh, I knew that'd come up. From my brief contact with the chans, I'd guess that a Neo-Nazi regime would be something they'd like, seeing as how they're comprised primarily of like-minded sociopaths. I wouldn't be surprised if a couple /b/tards showed up to a rally.
The thing about fascism and the Internet is that you can't go too fast with it. Sure I guess I'd like to censor it for the good of the nation but really, there's little risk from Internet-based groups. I'd hurt my nation's international image if I were to begin cracking down on the Internet. Something that I couldn't have while I was trying to distance myself from the UN. Worst case scenario is that we use agent provocateurs to incite dissidents to running straight into a government building armed with whatever homemade weapons I haven't explicitly outlawed.
If you want to see a wonderful example of Internet impotence, just take a gander at the ill-fated campaign of Ron Paul. It was gonna be the Ron Pual R
evolution! Ron Paul was gonna fix our economy with his magic wand of deregulation! He'd be the white man's Obama! But no, Internet popularity didn't amount to more than a hill of beans in the primaries.
Fondant post=18.74268.834548 said:
Agreed. We can duel for who get's what job once we've won. Sabres, pistols or armoured corps?
I prefer proxy war. We each get our own faction in the secret police and have them quietly kill each other, and at the end of the Five-Year Plan, loser gets sent to Canada to coordinate Party-funded uprisings.
Fondant post=18.74268.834548 said:
Place a speaker's corner in every major city, so the voices of dissent canbe heard. And written down. And dragged away, brutally tortured and exectuted by porcupine if neccesary. and I have a broad definition of 'neccesary'.
Exactly, free speech will be one of our core convictions. We just need to include a broad definition of sedition in the new constitution.