Which part? I personally prefer the bacon comment.Romidude said:This was the cherry on top of my perfect day, thanks.zombiestrangler said:Depends. If it was an eastern Asian country, I'd fight to the death because they don't fuck around. Middle Eastern, throw bacon and grenades at them. European or Canadian,I would turn traitor so fast.
thaluikhain said:China does not have Navy. That alone will limit how they wage wars. As a rule of thumb ships are the primary way to carry supplies from your own country to the country that you're invading.Mr.Numbers said:Well...you are talking about quite some time in the future there. No way of saying what things would be like then. If China developed the logistical capabilities to go a conquering and if it'd chewed its way through most of South East Asia, then yes, Australia might well be next...two big ifs though. And any number of powerful groups are going to see that happenign well in advance.
Personally, though, I'm getting a bit tired of China being seen as the next big baddie...it seems just as likely to me that we'll be on their side in the next major war.
Being a big military does not mean an effective force. It means that you got more people to feed and resupply. The US military have a very small combat force with a large logistical support force. IIRC it take 10 US military personnel to support one combat troop. Unless you sign up for a combat unit chances are you'll stuck as a truck driver, repair man (airplane, tanks, cars, trucks, ship, arms, etc), cook, paper pusher, nurse, doctor, communication, military police, bomb loader, computer guy, intel guy, etc.
The USA is very good at logistics because we have centenaries of experience invading other countries. We also have the world strongest and largest Navy. That help a lot when moving large quantity of supplies.
I would hope I do, I live in America, close to a city where gang violence is rather something we try to watch out for. SO I think you're underr estimating the hate that these groups have for each other and the excuse of law no longer in effect to stop them. This is also talking about those that would pick on the "weak". The sense of AMerican Patriotism is rather low.jdun said:Snip
The bolded part being the most important.demoman_chaos said:After seeing all these ________ invades America games like Homefront and MW2, I started wondering about this. If your country was invaded a foreign army and were losing, would you resist the invaders?
...
How zealous would you be in defending your country against a foreign army?
You really have no idea what I am talking about. Don't mix fantasy with reality. Reread what I have posted. That will answer all your questions.emeraldrafael said:I would hope I do, I live in America, close to a city where gang violence is rather something we try to watch out for. SO I think you're underr estimating the hate that these groups have for each other and the excuse of law no longer in effect to stop them. This is also talking about those that would pick on the "weak". The sense of AMerican Patriotism is rather low.jdun said:Snip
Finally, I think you're missing the point of the scenario, which is:
The bolded part being the most important.demoman_chaos said:After seeing all these ________ invades America games like Homefront and MW2, I started wondering about this. If your country was invaded a foreign army and were losing, would you resist the invaders?
...
How zealous would you be in defending your country against a foreign army?
And actually, lets go with this. You're saying that because American Citizenss have better weaponry then the Army, but not hte training, they'll succeed more then the Army. Well, lets see. The by and large is that a small portion of Americans have that kinda weaponry. Fewer know how to use it if they're not taught by the owners. Most Americans dont know how to use a weapon properly, and only would do what they see in games or movies. And they're supposed to stand against an Army with the training like, say.. Israel? Or Russia? Or against the Man power that is China (yeah, you can make all the jokes you want about how china has over a billion people but only about one of ten will have a quality gun, but still)?
ALso, that number is based of registered weapons. Most Gang members dont carry them, and most pack a sufficient heat since they turn cars into swiss cheese in drive bys.
you seem to be thinking that we americans are unified, and that the enemy is just getting of the boat and onto land. That our army is still standing and ready,a nd that the citizens are all sufficiently trained and all have a weapon and are all masters. Really, what the situation calls for that Americans are in small Guerrilla parties, on the run and severely outnumbered, out gunned, and facing a far more skilled and superior enemy that has control over America. So these masters hired to teach special ops are:
a) few and far between
b) not operating these training camps that anyone can just go to
c) training people in the field, because to do otherwise and train them to the master level is wasting supplies
d) Not amassing these large number of civilians to train to make a small personal army themselves.
So the primary resistance force is regular American people (since the best of the best would be recruited to the army, and they are losing), who if they own a gun, they own a hunting rifle or small fire arm like a 9 mm. Who likely have no real combat experience, and if their veterans are older, and beat up body wise. And dont have the discipline to organize plans other then those used in halo games they've stomped noobs with. Who would think to pick up guns from the battlefield and try and do that.
Now, taking all that into consideration, since that IS the scenario, the argument that these roving masters of weaponry with high powered guns that rival or surpass the military can stand against a highly trained, fitted, and manned army that is kicking our army's asses up and down the country falls apart rather swiftly. Especially since I'm going to assume that most of the Escapist community arent closeted gun nuts that have the skills to beat a Green Beret/Army Ranger/Navy Seal all rolled into one. Let alone whatever Special Ops the enemy is bringing with them. Really, you're looking at the Red Dawn Scenario more then anything else.
Technically, Hawaii was never invaded, but rather attacked. Having said that, the only piece of the U.S. to have been successfully invaded during the last century was the island of Kiska in the Aleutian island chain (and maybe another small uninhabited island or two in that chain).Ice Azure said:I believe that my state was already invaded once. I'm sure you all know what that attack was by looking at my location.
Whoa, I completely forgot about this topic because it was made exactly one year ago and it was right about when I joined.tsb247 said:Technically, Hawaii was never invaded, but rather attacked. Having said that, the only piece of the U.S. to have been successfully invaded during the last century was the island of Kiska in the Aleutian island chain (and maybe another small uninhabited island or two in that chain).Ice Azure said:I believe that my state was already invaded once. I'm sure you all know what that attack was by looking at my location.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiska
Fun fact, the island of Skira in that (Horrible) Codemasters game Operation Flashpoint: Dragon Rising is based on the topography and overall shape of Kiska.
I guess someone brought it back from the dead, I read it, and it got started again. Wow... I did not realize that myself.Ice Azure said:Whoa, I completely forgot about this topic because it was made exactly one year ago and it was right about when I joined.tsb247 said:Technically, Hawaii was never invaded, but rather attacked. Having said that, the only piece of the U.S. to have been successfully invaded during the last century was the island of Kiska in the Aleutian island chain (and maybe another small uninhabited island or two in that chain).Ice Azure said:I believe that my state was already invaded once. I'm sure you all know what that attack was by looking at my location.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiska
Fun fact, the island of Skira in that (Horrible) Codemasters game Operation Flashpoint: Dragon Rising is based on the topography and overall shape of Kiska.
Technically yes, it was attacked, not invaded, my bad.
Edit: Wait... How did I post on the 29th yet my registration date is the 30th? Is the registration date based on my timezone or the Escapist? Must have been one of the first topics I replied to.