hmmm....geekRAGE said:Erg humans need protein. Where else can we get enough protein in sufficient amounts?
I eat meat, but imo, if people are going to use the "animals are life and life is precious" argument, going vegetarian is the logical conclusion, not vegan.Amaror said:I am a Vegatarian too, but not a vegan.
And btw. i hate the f**** idiots who say that a vegetarian is only goind half the way, while shoving steaks in their mouth.
But I think killing animals for food isn't neccessary, but i do think that having domestic animals is a good think, so i am vegetarian and not vegan.
Humans don't need protein we need essential amino acids, all of which can easily be acquired from vegetable sources.geekRAGE said:Erg humans need protein. Where else can we get enough protein in sufficient amounts?
That's awesome. Where'd you get that?AstylahAthrys said:Also, this:
![]()
Good luck with that vegan thing now.
Soy and other beans and whole grains.Amaror said:hmmm....geekRAGE said:Erg humans need protein. Where else can we get enough protein in sufficient amounts?
Eggs, Milk, Nuts.
There are a lot of ways to get Protein.
It really is no problem to be a vegetarian, you can get anything you need without problems, being vegan is the one that is difficult.
That sounds disgusting. Surely it has to be functional, skeletal muscle, or it would have no texture?BiscuitTrouser said:and i think cloned meat from a single cell is the best idea ever. I cant wait to see or even work on this. Id eat this forever if i could. Now thats out of the way.
I think in the real world, every animal dies!While i think in a perfect world no animals should die i accept that some do.
Ahh, the casual racism defense. Well-played, sir.Blablahb said:No, it's not. Because all vegans I've met are holier-than-thou naive idiots, and what you're talking about doesn't exist, and hasn't for centuries.
Actually, I didn't call you a racist.Blablahb said:See, this is exactly what I meant. Two posts in, and a vegan is trying to villify me by calling me a racist because he has nothing better to say.Zachary Amaranth said:Ahh, the casual racism defense. Well-played, sir.
Thank you for proving me right.
You make some very valid points, however:Cadmium Magenta said:Hi forum!
After watching MovieBob's recent Big Picture episode on the PeTA/Super Mario controversy, I'm curious about people's stance on animal rights here. What I found curious is that Bob asserted he supports animal rights, in that he abstains from products like fur and boycotts companies that test on animals. On the other hand though, eating animals does not seem to be problematic for him.
Just to be clear, I'm vegan myself and a very strong believer in animal rights, but I'm not a fan of PeTA and I absolutely agree with Bob's disapproval of their hysterical and sensationalist publicity work. Also, while I feel that being vegan is the most ethical way of living with animals, I do not view myself as being better than meat-eaters, nor do I think that eating meat makes you a bad person. Please don't see my opinion as an affront to your lifestyle and worldview. I don't mean to be hostile. My goal is to make people question some things we have been taught about the animals we eat, without shoving my own morality down their throats.
So let me just very briefly outline why I chose to become vegan:
Human beings are omnivores, which means that we can eat almost anything. There are many divergent nutritional studies and opinions out there, but the gist seems to be that we can get by equally well on meat- or plant-based diets or any combination thereof, as long as we spend some time thinking about what nutrients we need and where to get them.
This means that there is no biological need for us to eat meat. We simply feel like eating it.
Therefore, whenever we kill an animal for food, we are essentially deciding that our appetite is more important than that creature's life. We are inflicting deadly violence on a defenseless being, simply for our own pleasure. Personally, I don't think that's ethical behavior.
Now, many people say that nature isn't ethical, that animals brutally kill and eat other animals all the time. That's true, but we are not animals. We are not lions or sharks. Lions or sharks cannot choose *not* to eat meat because they are natural carnivores and couldn't survive on a herbivorous diet. Humans, on the other hand, can. We are moral beings and as a result of our morality, we place innumerable restrictions on ourselves for the greater good: We prohibit or disapprove of theft, murder, rape, deception, defamation etc.
So why do we think it's okay to deprive an entire species of their liberty and kill them for their flesh?
To sum it up: Just because we *can* eat anything, doesn't necessarily mean that we *should*.
What do you think? I'm very curious to know.
Humanity is killing a great many plants and tree's too. Do plants not count as animals? they live don't they? they also follow the 'MRS GREN' list of life processes. Also, considering that many plants have adapted and evolved to mimic insects and so forth, they must have some form of sentience or intelligence we are not capable of yet seeing or understanding. Is it wrong to eat plants?Therefore, whenever we kill an animal for food, we are essentially deciding that our appetite is more important than that creature's life. We are inflicting deadly violence on a defenseless being, simply for our own pleasure. Personally, I don't think that's ethical behavior.