I'm still not entirely sure how bad the sense of time thing would really be though As I said above You may be immortal but if others aren't wouldn't you still be able to keep your grounding in reality. Granted things that seem like a long time to others may seem like a short time to you but wouldn't you still be able to keep your mind sane?GothmogII said:Well. There's already plenty of highminded thought about it...but here's some of the common againsts:
One, a human's sense of time, as mentioned above. As it's currently thought, due to our short lives, we perceive time a certain way. That is, our lives -seem- pretty long to us. A year is a long time when you only live maybe 70-90 years. But, from an immortal's perspective, it's thought that time would kind of blur together, days become seconds, years become minutes etc.
I don't know whether this is actually something I believe however, being that there has been no immortals (that we know off) so it's not exactly as if you could just ask them if their sense of time was skewed.
Two. An immortal can not form permanent attachments. Related to the sense of time too, the idea is, that being immortal, you'll see all you're friends and family die. And while you could eventually make new ones, you may find yourself not caring anymore, after all, taking the time thing, if everyone around you has from your point of view the life span of a may fly, how can you form lasting bonds? This leads to a form a kind sociopathy in itself, as you may just cease to care about -anything-.
Three. What happens when the earth, and it will, eventually dies? I mean, if at that point you've got some kind of spaceship with unlimited fuel, great. But, if you don't, you're in for a loooooooong and lonely float. In space, it's not like swimming, don't think you just have to float long enough and you'll get somewhere, and given how big space is, you're not going anywhere fast.
(This is disregarding the distinctions between clinical and total immortality. Clinical immortality is where you simply have an increased lifespan. But someone could still shoot you say. Total immortality is where you are quite literally immune to everything. However, with the regards to the former, clinical immortality is a least somewhat more plausible, although still fiction at this time. Total immortality is a bit more out there, as anything we can think of a the moment all suffers from degradation and is capable of being destroyed i.e. cloning yourself, putting your brain in a jar, digitising your conciousness, and only temporary long term solutions at best.
Your second point I think would be the hardest for me if I was immortal but I think I could eventually get over it. Maybe I'm heartless for feeling that way, who knows.
I hadn't even thought about the third point but I'm sure there are ways I could work around it.
A lot of people seem to be of the opinion that Immortality would get boring over time but I still don't think I would get bored. I'm the kinda guy that loves history, or watching the discovery channel and finding out new things. I'm always very curious to see how things play out on the world stage so living through hundreds of years and watching all the interesting historical events that unfold would be fascinating in itself.