Yeah, that's the one thing everyone seems to forget, if there are any problems with immortality you'd have an eternity to fix them. In fact, there's a Cracked article (http://www.cracked.com/article_18708_5-reasons-immortality-would-be-worse-than-death.html) that lists a few of these problems, I personally would have them all solved within a millenia tops.Frozen Donkey Wheel2 said:Nope. Not a curse at all. Here are some of the common arguments against it, and why they are wrong.
1. You'll run out of things to do, causing you to lose your appreciation for life, causing your life to become horrible and pointless.
--People who say this don't have any imagination. It's a big world, and it's an IMPOSSIBLY big universe. If I had immortality, I wouldn't stop until I'd seen it all, which would probably never happen. A life of immortality would be fucking fantastic. What's that you say? Space travel hasn't been invented? I'm immortal, you idiot. I can wait.
2. You'll have to watch your friends grow old and die.
--I. AM. IMMORTAL. Nobody THINKS about what that means. I can spend the next trillion years inventing some kind of "Immortality Potion" and then spend another trillion inventing time travel. And don't tell me about paradoxes.[footnote]If I go back in time and make my friends immortal, I won't have a reason to invent immortality/time travel anymore, and won't do it. Paradox![/footnote] I can spend another trillion years inventing a machine that can keep the paradox stable. Like some kind of...Paradox Machine.
3. Nothing lasts forever, everything dies sometime. It's the natural order of things. You can't go against the natural order of things.
--And just why the hell not? Humans can't breathe underwater, but scuba-divers do it anyway every goddamn day. THAT is breaking the natural order of things. Frankly, breaking the natural order of things is what humanity is all about anyway, and I think it's a great system.
Personally, if someone invents robot bodies, I'll be the first in line for conversion.
To an extent, sure.immortalfrieza said:So... Basically you would want to be a modern Jesus.Daniel_Rosamilia said:I'd love to have immortality, but I'd like to stay at a particular age, and still have the ability to die, temporarily of course, but if I get shot at point-blank in the head, I want to die, and then come back.
This may not technically fall under 'immortality', but that's how I would like it to be.
actually, if your friends are immortal with you, they can tell you to invent immortality/time travel so that you go back and give them immortality. paradox avertedFrozen Donkey Wheel2 said:2. You'll have to watch your friends grow old and die.
--I. AM. IMMORTAL. Nobody THINKS about what that means. I can spend the next trillion years inventing some kind of "Immortality Potion" and then spend another trillion inventing time travel. And don't tell me about paradoxes.[footnote]If I go back in time and make my friends immortal, I won't have a reason to invent immortality/time travel anymore, and won't do it. Paradox![/footnote] I can spend another trillion years inventing a machine that can keep the paradox stable. Like some kind of...Paradox Machine.
While I see your point, I would argue life and death are slightly different. One of the distinguishing features of a living organism in biological study is that it is capable of dying. If something cannot die, it is not a living organism. Eating in its definition does not require hunger and sex does not require desire in its definition.Tanakh said:That's a false dichotomy, is like saying that in order to eat you have to be hungry, or that in order to have sexual intercourse you need to be horny. If you have a passion in life you will peruse it no matter what, because it's amazing to chase a dream.Loner Jo Jo said:In order to truly live, you have to die.
Gimme immortality or give me death!!!1
Nah, No Paradox there. Once you go back and change history, a new time line is created. You won't have to create the immortality potion and time travel, but it won't change what would now be the past of you already doing it. The Back to the Future series explained that nicely.Frozen Donkey Wheel2 said:2. You'll have to watch your friends grow old and die.
--I. AM. IMMORTAL. Nobody THINKS about what that means. I can spend the next trillion years inventing some kind of "Immortality Potion" and then spend another trillion inventing time travel. And don't tell me about paradoxes.[footnote]If I go back in time and make my friends immortal, I won't have a reason to invent immortality/time travel anymore, and won't do it. Paradox![/footnote] I can spend another trillion years inventing a machine that can keep the paradox stable. Like some kind of...Paradox Machine.
There are several problems with this:StargateSpankyHam said:Perhaps more interestingly, immortality is actually within our grasp.
With technology advancing as it is, computers will be as intricate and advanced as the human brain by 2029, assuming that human civilization doesn't suffer a socioeconomic meltdown between now and then.
Neuroscience may take a little bit longer to catch up, but when it does, it will be possible to connect with a sufficiently advanced computer and simply 'copy & paste' the entire contents of our brain into it. In this regard, so long as one conducts regular backups of their mind, and can afford a new body, they would be effectively immortal.
Never mind the tantalizing possibility of uploading one's own mind into the computer arrays of something much larger and more specialized...such as a spacecraft. Without the need for life support systems and living quarters, there is no real obstacle to centuries-long flights between star systems.
Call me a futurist...but immortality is going to rock.
I can't imagine getting bored as long as there's a human civilization manufacturing escapist entertainment.Zakarath said:I'd want to be immortal as long as I could still die when I eventually got bored.
I think this is a bit irrelevant tbh. If this is actually eternal life that we're talking about then people would lose there petty hangups like that. After you've brought planets to ruin simply but outlasting then you would stop caring about picketing soldiers funerals.Infernai said:SNIP
This definition irks me for two reasons, it's recursive, so life it's defined by death and death by life (that is the sign of a shitty definition in logic). The second is that virus are freaking alive, "borderline life forms" is crap, sure, they do need a host to function, but we need far more, food, a very specific atmosphere, gravity, air pressure (but not too much or too little), and why do stuff like Conways game isn't even in the discussion for biologists? <youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcuBvj0pw-E>Loner Jo Jo said:One of the distinguishing features of a living organism in biological study is that it is capable of dying.