funguy2121 said:
KeyMaster45 said:
And I can certainly differentiate between porn and art. Art vs. entertainment can be argued ad nauseum, but if I'm going to watch a season of Nurse Jackie or the new Christopher Nolan film, or play the new Call of Duty or listen to the new Black Keys album without paying for it, I'm going to feel bad because artists poured their hearts out into those projects. Though an argument could be made that cinematography, editing and performance have improved the visceral-ness of porn, the end result isn't a master work of storytelling - it's simply a greater state of arousal. I don't think masturbation, as fun as it is, should ever be held in as high esteem as enjoying an album for the first time or discovering a new filmmaker.
I won't argue the first part of your post, I think the issue of companies making oodles of money as an argument for stealing something has been argued to death already and we'd get nowhere dragging that ugly corpse into the conversation.
That last paragraph though is that part that really bothers me, and partly the reason why I made the thread in the first place. It's that mentality that because porn is, well, porn; that it's not entitled to the same rights as other forms of entertainment. The people that work in porn are still doing work; it's their job. Some of them are actually quite proud about what they do, and enjoy what they do.
Yes, it is very hypocritical to say it's not okay to pirate games, movies, and music; then turn around and say it's okay with porn because you don't think they deserve to be compensated for their work. It's a very twisted way of thinking one that most if not all of us are guilty of.
If we're going to fight to protect one area of entertainment then we need to protect them all. By saying it's okay to steal from one but not the others you end up making the whole campaign for the others pointless; that's the way I see it.