Interplay Claims It Could Take Back Fallout

Recommended Videos

Fuselage

New member
Nov 18, 2009
932
0
0
Flig said:
Part of the deal when they bought the IP was that Interplay was gonna make an MMO. I don't understand why all of a sudden they aren't going to let them do it anymore. They aren't risking any money by letting them make it. They didn't give Interplay any capital to make it, the MMO is fully funded by Interplay. If it's good, Bethesda gets fanbase for one of it's major IPs and more advertising for the next Fallouts. If it's bad, it fades into obscurity, Interplay folds, and Bethesda is unaffected. And yet they still felt like being dicks and blocking Interplay's right to make this game.
The thing is that Interplay does not have the money or talent to make a Fallout based game, Most of the team that worked on Fallout 1 and 2 are now at Obsidian.
Interplay does not really have the money to make a Fallout MMO, Think of Server Costs and Maitnence, Making an MMO is a huge risk that is very expensive and he fact is Interplay don't have enough money to make it.
 

Nedoras

New member
Jan 8, 2010
506
0
0
Irridium said:
Just give the license to Obsidian. They seem to know how to make a better Fallout game then both Bethesda and Interplay.
I completely agree. New Vegas was a bit buggy, but overall it was a great game. It had that certain charm and sense of humor that Fallout always had, but was oddly absent in Fallout 3.
 

InnerRebellion

New member
Mar 6, 2010
2,059
0
0
Hmmm. Having been doing an LP of Fallout, and slowly growing frustrated with it, I think Obsidian should actually receive the license. Maybe give Interplay more involvement though.
 

DragonBorn96

New member
Jan 17, 2011
188
0
0
Tbh Interplay would destroy the franchise. They only just limped in to the metaphorical barn and compared to Bethesda im not sure that they "know" the market where as Bethesda does and thety would just lose a hell of alot of money from lackluster sales because they didn't pay attention and besides im also sure that Bethesda has more than proved themselves worthy of keeping Fallout whether Interplay has no real claim to fame for Fallout.
 

The Funslinger

Corporate Splooge
Sep 12, 2010
6,150
0
0
mjc0961 said:
After reading this, I sort of want Bethesda to have it more. Not sure I can trust a company who can't count to make a decent game anymore. Hey Interplay, there is this number between three and five, did you know about this? It's called FOUR. Fallout 4 would be next, not Fallout 5.
Despite the name, I think "New Vegas" counts as four.
 

Faladorian

New member
May 3, 2010
635
0
0
Maybe Interplay doesn't realize that Bethesda is way way way better at making their game than they are, and nobody wants Interplay to be making the next Fallout, anyway.
 

Faladorian

New member
May 3, 2010
635
0
0
DragonBorn96 said:
Change of plan, let Obsidian in, better Fallout = more moneyz
NO! Obsidian sucks at making Fallout games. The only reason I can see why Bethesda would need help from them is more voice actors. That's. It.
 

Jroo wuz heer

New member
Apr 1, 2010
351
0
0
cjneon said:
I just wish someone would program a Fallout game which doesnt crash every 5 minutes? Seriously just employ some decent programmers?
neither of those are questions?
get a better platform? it works fine for me?

see how annoying that is?
 

CATS FTW

New member
Mar 21, 2010
134
0
0
DarkRyter said:
The one who deserves the license most of all is obviously this guy.

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/profiles/view

I think, with their world view and experience, that they've proven very capable of making great fallout games. Also they're sexy as all hell.
Holy fuck berrries IT'S ME! Wow, truthfully I don't want to have those rights, it's not the kind of game I'd like to make anyways. P.S. How'd you choose me?
 

Radeonx

New member
Apr 26, 2009
7,013
0
0
CATS FTW said:
DarkRyter said:
The one who deserves the license most of all is obviously this guy.

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/profiles/view

I think, with their world view and experience, that they've proven very capable of making great fallout games. Also they're sexy as all hell.
Holy fuck berrries IT'S ME! Wow, truthfully I don't want to have those rights, it's not the kind of game I'd like to make anyways. P.S. How'd you choose me?
It isn't just you. It is a url that links to the profile of whoever clicks it.

OT: I honestly hope Interplay gets it.
The old Fallout games are godlike compared to Fallout 3.
 

BlindTom

New member
Aug 8, 2008
929
0
0
Actually Fallout belongs to me. It is a place in my heart and Bethesda broke my heart with fallout 3. Give it to interplay.
 

infinity_turtles

New member
Apr 17, 2010
800
0
0
Starke said:
The reason was, Interplay could make the MMO if they did it quickly. The contract had a timetable that they had to meet. The reason for this is pretty simple, if there wasn't a time table then Interplay could have just had a Fallout MMO as vaporware for years, tying up that aspect of the franchise.

The first part of the timetable was securing funding for the project. Interplay wasn't able to do that on time. Everything since then has been Interplay trying to cling to an aspect of a contract they already defaulted on.

EDIT: I mean this whole "we can simply take back the IP" thing is insane. To do that they'd have to demonstrate that Bethesda was acting in bad faith when they purchased the IP, and then probably have to cough up the money Bethesda paid them for the license.
I'm going to be blunt. You're wrong. The timetable was not to make the game quickly, it was to start by April 2009, which they did, and finish by April 2012. Bethesda tried to sue because they wanted the rights back, trying to make the claim that they weren't far enough along. This got thrown out because it was bullshit. Then Bethesda followed up with this suit saying they could only use the name Fallout and nothing else. Interplay has kept up there end of the deal.

As for taking back the IP, if the MMO rights were part of the same contract as the one granting Bethesda the IP, it's possible that Interplay could get the rights back. This is because Bethesda's actions make for a fairly solid suit if they want to have the contract nullified. This current suit is practically the definition of Bad Faith Negotiations.
 

Sinisterair

New member
Oct 15, 2008
353
0
0
mjc0961 said:
After reading this, I sort of want Bethesda to have it more. Not sure I can trust a company who can't count to make a decent game anymore. Hey Interplay, there is this number between three and five, did you know about this? It's called FOUR. Fallout 4 would be next, not Fallout 5.
Not to burst your bubble but there stating Beth can make Up to the 5th Fallout And its Fallout 3
Fallout Nv(4) Then the 5th, its counting NV as the 4th in the series
 

cerebus23

New member
May 16, 2010
1,275
0
0
People cant count. :p

And lets be clear interplay cannot run a business. Back in the day interplay had any number of great games that sold well, not just black isle but interplay was a pretty prominent name in the games world back when EA was a game maker not a publisher, and lucasarts made good star wars games.

Yet despite the fact that in my game library and many people game library interplay existed any number of interplay titles, interplay continued to hemmorage money, like wtf.

Did bethesda really purchase the rights in "good faith" i say hell no. It was pretty clear they knew they had a bunch of business idiots on the phone that had a potentially huge ip on their hands, and hammered out a deal involving a MMO. A MMO is the most difficult thing in the games world to do proper it requires mountains of time and money. If interplays idea was to angle for the mmo they should have been smacked by their business lawyers, and interplay agreeing to a strict timetable their lawyers should have hung their clients.

beth constantly nannying them from day 1 was a clear sign that beth had no faith the interplay could follow through on the mmo on any timetable. beth also pulled a rather dickish move when the fallout bundle came out throwing a tantrum that the bundle would confuse gamers, that could nto keep bethesda fallout 3d game seperate from black isle isometric 2d sprite games.....

I think any good will here is wholly imagined, bethesda knew they caught a fish and were going to jerk that fish around hard. Neither company has acted in good faith, bethesda games are wholly overrated, but interplay has done nothing worth mention in nearly 15 years either, and even when they were showed an extreme knack of not being able to make money.
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
I hope this dosent hurt the franchise, while I dont think a fallout MMO would be a bad idea I prefer fallout single games, or mabye we dont need anymore
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,186
0
0
Kakashi on crack said:
Ohh this is funny, two big companies acting like children...
This happens quite often. It's probably because all a company cares about in the end is money. That's my opinion anyway.
 

AlternatePFG

New member
Jan 22, 2010
2,858
0
0
Irridium said:
Just give the license to Obsidian. They seem to know how to make a better Fallout game then both Bethesda and Interplay.
Well that's because Obsidian is pretty much Black Isle.
 

Reed Spacer

That guy with the thing.
Jan 11, 2011
841
0
0
Really, who cares?

As long as we still get Fallout games, this doesn't affect us, and frankly, the world doesn't need another MMO.