Yeah, that's it. Thanks mate, cookie for you.kman123 said:i THINK it was Robot Rock...ironically fitting.Yossarian1507 said:Another One Bites the Dust was at the beginning of the fight. The song I want to find was at the end of it.kman123 said:Wasn't it Queen's Another One Bites The Dust?Yossarian1507 said:Whoa, how the hell did that happen? America is getting it later than Australia and Europe?
Anyway, I've seen it day after the Polish release, and gotta say I love it. Robert Downey Jr. is the best actor imaginable for Tony Stark.
Anyway, if you liked the first one, you'll like this one as well. IMO a bit better action than in IM1, witty dialogs are funny as always... And Scarlett Johansson. Damn, she's so HOT! She also kicks some serious asses in this movie in one memorable scene at Hammer industries ;]
Also, a question for other people, who've seen this already:
What's the name of that electro-sounding song playing at the end of Drunk Iron Man vs Warmachine fight? I heard it before, but I just forgot the title.
either that or Daft Punk
It kinda sounded Daft Punk'ish, so now I just need to find a title.
Wow. That's totally lame.LordCuthberton said:Well prepare to hate the film counterpart now!Samurai Goomba said:I'm very much looking forward to seeing it. From the trailers it looks like the perfect sequel to what was definitely one of the better superhero movies.
Which is funny, because I always hated Iron Man as a comic character.
OT: Terrible. They derailed the film and have forgotton everything that made it great. Do you know what the plot is about?
The plot is about a fucking defense contract. There is no danger. At all. The villian in trailers has less screentime than fucking Dr Lecter in Silence of the Lambs.
And they have ruined Don Cheadles career.
So like Spiderman 3 you're saying?Plinglebob said:I saw this last night, but still think the first is better. The characters are all great, but the story isn't as good as I was hoping. IT feels a lot like they had ideas and so just mashed them together. There's also lots of nods to the Avengers cross-over which didn't help the film much as they felt like they were bolted on a bit. Also, stay after the end credits, its worth it.
Wow I really disagree with you there. Thought Don Cheadle was great in it. The end fight scene with the drones is amazing except Whiplash's end battle is way too short.LordCuthberton said:Well prepare to hate the film counterpart now!Samurai Goomba said:I'm very much looking forward to seeing it. From the trailers it looks like the perfect sequel to what was definitely one of the better superhero movies.
Which is funny, because I always hated Iron Man as a comic character.
OT: Terrible. They derailed the film and have forgotton everything that made it great. Do you know what the plot is about?
The plot is about a fucking defense contract. There is no danger. At all. The villian in trailers has less screentime than fucking Dr Lecter in Silence of the Lambs.
And they have ruined Don Cheadles career.
I agree, has she never seen a movie before? If something is beeping and flashing a red light, it's about to explode.LordCuthberton said:However when she is looking at the beeping self destruct robot at the end (Waiting for our hero to swoop in at the nick of time, no doubt) with that gormless look, that made my day.
MOAR MUST BE COMPLAINED ABOUT!LordCuthberton said:I'm afraid my reply is rather long! Sorry.viperthejedi said:Wow I really disagree with you there. Thought Don Cheadle was great in it. The end fight scene with the drones is amazing except Whiplash's end battle is way too short.
OT: The problem with Don Cheadle was the script. It did not suit him. All his lines were poorly written, and this is the guy who made Hotel Rwanda such a epic film. Not only did they write his character into a different person.
Iron man 1: A friend of Tony, who while dissaproving of his actions because it would jepordize his career, is willing to betray his job to keep his friend safe.
Iron Man 2: He is written as a complete asshat. He has a huge fight with Tony for no reason (The film says it's to stop Tony making a drunken fool of himself, but the real reason is because they realised they have too few action sequences) and this results in him betraying him for a suit. Then he ends up working with the obvious villian. His allegance flies all over the shop, and not in a good "General Shepard/Farcry2 Jackel" way. Along with some simply goofy lines this is a huge red mark on Cheadles impressive filmography.
While I'm here, I must say they wrote Paltrow's character much better in this film. She has gone from Miss Exposition for the little, stupid children in the cinema to a actual character. However when she is looking at the beeping self destruct robot at the end (Waiting for our hero to swoop in at the nick of time, no doubt) with that gormless look, that made my day.
On to the battles then.
It was awfully generic. That's a hard thing to write as generic is such a widely used term nowdays. Generic is now generic. What I'm getting at is that there was no real variety, I could tell that the giant globe was going to kill a couple of the Air Force robots when they were introduced - it was easy to guess the "Chekovs". Whether that's because I read Tv Tropes religiously, I don't know.
The heart of the problem is that there was no fear of danger during the battles. After Nick Fury introduced himself and you realise that Iron Man is a huge money sponge, I figured that Iron Man will never die. And now you have War Machine, a fan favorite (for obvious reasons) and as such the ability to never die. War Machine could easily be adapted as a direct to DVD film if they needed.
There was no threat to our characters - even if they lost what happens? They die and some prat gets a defense contract.
Compare to the first film.
They die and some megalomaniac with the ambition of god himself destroys everyone you know and care for and takes over the world with technology that is years ahead of its time.
That is a threat. "Justin Hammer[footnote]Honestly, the writers were crap. Who would think that is suitable villian name?![/footnote]" is not.
Lastly, I agree. Mr Whipfist was a anti-climax. I mean, fucking Dr Doom lasted longer.
They really thought he would top Jeff Bridges?LordCuthberton said:Good list, I hated this film so much.Hubilub said:Why the bodyguard who's only there for unfunny comic relief?
I could probably complain about more, but this is from the top of my head.
I'm looking forward to MovieBobs review. I may Copy N Paste our complaints to it.
And just to reliterate, JUSTIN HAMMER? WHAT IN THE HELL.
I hate how they reduce Stark to a pathetic boy who needs a hug for almost the whole freakin' movie. All for what? Because he is soon going to die? That didn't stop him from being himself before, why should it now?LordCuthberton said:Seriously, I don't think anyone read the base script before they handed it over Seltzer and Friedberg for their comic approval.Hubilub said:They really thought he would top Jeff Bridges?
Fuck him!
I also find it hard to believe that he is the second biggest weapons manufacturer in the world when his most prized weapon doesn't work. You'd think his lifetime achievement would have been field-tested.
And that was just stupid. The entire movie was stupid.
I laughed once, when Stark moves Pot's annoying desk ornament - because I was feeling the exact same way as Stark.
I think his little birdie could top Stark as well.LordCuthberton said:You forgot to mention that he lost all character. He is just a rude, self interested twat in this film, while in the original he goes from twat to hero.Hubilub said:I hate how they reduce Stark to a pathetic boy who needs a hug for almost the whole freakin' movie. All for what? Because he is soon going to die? That didn't stop him from being himself before, why should it now?
They abadoned that plotline.
I found more emotional response from Mr Electric-ropes in this film.