I don't actually think I'm doing the opposite to what you're doing. I'm merely describing the character based on the information the game provided me with. I could do the exact same thing with any character, and it would only make the character sound good if there was the detail and depth required to make the character sound good. I'm fairly certain I couldn't make a piece of crap sound good (and I don't really get what that analogy was on about...) by doing what I did.TheOneBearded said:
Regardless, yes, we do seem to have differing opinions on each game. I will add that while I found Lamb's Collectivism as intriguing a prospect as Rand's Objectivism, I hardly support either of them. I loathe the idea of Objectivism, for example, but that doesn't mean I don't find it an interesting prospect intellectually. Same goes for Lamb's Collectivism.