SweetShark said:
For God shake, why you are again so agressive with B-Cell?
Yes, he established he LOVE DOOM to Death. And yes, I disagree with his opinion.
What will happen if I post at some point the translated Greek Doom Comic I promised? Will you attack me as well?
I am doing this also for love you know. I don't want others to express their hate just become I made a thread about Doom...
Lets agree or disagree with B-Cell more maturely, ok?
Also me neither know proper grammar, punctuation and spelling, so sorry guys.
Peace.
Elvis has explained this, but I can point out the reasons:
-Condescension. He repeatedly uses terms like "friends" or "my friend," despite no such relationship existing.
-The posts he does are effectively clickbait. That's not bad in of itself (but certainly not good), but these are examples of leading questions, designed more to push a certain line of thought than facilitate actual discussion. For example this thread is titled
"Is Doom 2016 has best FPS level design since Half life or even 90s old shooters?" Poor grammar aside, that's a leading question, and it's obvious that the thread is going to be pushing this line of thought above all else. An example of a non-leading question would be "which FPS has/had the best level design?"
This is done over, and over, and over. For example, lets look at the threads B-cell has started in recent times. These threads are titled:
*"The best Horror game of all time is not belong to resident evil or silent hills imo but.."
*"Was bioshock infinite the worst AAA FPS ever made?"
*"Top 5 most overrated games of this generation?"
*"Are almost all military shooters mediocre since Medal of Honor 1999?"
There are other threads, true, but these are just examples that he's taken part in in the past month alone.
-Clickbaity posts would be fine if they were intended to facilitate discussion. Except they're not. B-cell ends his opening posts with "discuss," but this isn't a discussion he wants, it's a soapbox to voice his opinion, damn whoever disagrees with it. There's a dishonesty in intent there at best, and at worst, it wastes the time of anyone who genuinely wants to discuss this.
-The soapboxing by itself isn't well thought out. For example, lets look at the start of his BioShock Infinite tirade:
Hello,
so my friends when i looks into AAA FPS games. theres so many bad ones but not bioshock infinite tier bad. bioshock infinite even got higher reviews than Half life 2 and System shock 2 which is big facepalm worthy.
The game even has worst level deisgn and worst Shooting mechanics in FPS game i have ever seen in very high rated game. I never seen anything good about this game. Game absolutely suck as FPS. "but but its action adventure game.." no its not. its also horrible action game too. if you cant make shooting right in FPS, nor level design whats the point of making FPS game? that is rouge warrior tier game. then theres elizabeth that annoying teenager sidekick. this is easily one of the worst FPS i have ever played in my lifetime. the game is basically tomb raider of FPS genre. even COD and its clone are better than this.
what do you think my friend? are there any worse AAA FPS game than bioshock infinite? discuss.
See what's wrong? Here, let me explain:
1) Is a game getting higher reviews than another really face-palm worthy? If so, explain.
2) Explain why the level design and shooting mechanics are bad, don't just say they're bad.
3) Explain why a FPS automatically requires "level design" to function and/or explain why the "old school" is better than more linear variants.
4) What makes Elizabeth annoying?
5) What's wrong with Tomb Raider and/or CoD?
Now, B-cell has vented his opinion for me to know what he considers wrong with these elements/games, but taking the argument by itself, it's terrible. It's poorly written, and relies on nothing more than "this is bad because I say it's bad." Every debate of this nature is inherently subjective, but one can at least try to make a case for why they think this way. B-cell either can't or won't, and after all these months, if not years of posting, he hasn't improved.
-And finally, to top it all off...it's BORING. Even without these threads, B-cell has made his views clear so many times that we don't need the threads to know what he thinks. Yes, he loved Doom 2016. Good for him. Didn't need a thread to have the same point reiterated over and over. In the past, there was some unitentional humour to these posts due to how poorly reasoned they were, but either a) he's still incapable of putting forth an argument, or b) he's just trolling. Either way, I'm tired of both. So much that explaining to you why B-cell's posts are poorly made was more interesting than taking part in the 'discussion' itself.