Is Hitting A Girl All That Bad?
- Thread starter DarthScorpio11
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Sexist morals if anything. To be fair, niether should hit either, but because of the way today is, people think if a man strikes a woman under ANY circumstances, its wrong and he should be punished, even in self defence.
The worst part is women use this to theri advantage sometime so they'll hit a man, abuse etc and when that man finally snaps, it's instantly "Oh I was struck by a man, you heartless bastard!".
Like women kicking men in the balls. they think it's funny but after a while you've just permanently damaged a mans reproductive organ and in some cases, caused them to become sterile. There's been a few court cases when a teenager girl(s) have kicked a kid so badly in the sack he became fertile at only 15, basically destroying all chances of him having a kid from his own DNA.
Obviously if a woman strikes me im not going to openly let them hit me, I'll put their arm into a lock or something to not hit but stop them. Weapons though, they come at me with a knife... Guess who's about to have THEIR crotch kicked...
The worst part is women use this to theri advantage sometime so they'll hit a man, abuse etc and when that man finally snaps, it's instantly "Oh I was struck by a man, you heartless bastard!".
Like women kicking men in the balls. they think it's funny but after a while you've just permanently damaged a mans reproductive organ and in some cases, caused them to become sterile. There's been a few court cases when a teenager girl(s) have kicked a kid so badly in the sack he became fertile at only 15, basically destroying all chances of him having a kid from his own DNA.
Obviously if a woman strikes me im not going to openly let them hit me, I'll put their arm into a lock or something to not hit but stop them. Weapons though, they come at me with a knife... Guess who's about to have THEIR crotch kicked...
I try to not hit anyone under most circumstances.
Sharpened knives, however....
In all seriousness, I'd sooner hit 50 men than 1 lady. If that's sexist, then so be it, but I don't feel comfortable when doing so. Male brains are generally conditioned to want to want to please ladies, for obvious reasons. Of course, there are exceptions but they all end up with the same agenda.
Sharpened knives, however....
In all seriousness, I'd sooner hit 50 men than 1 lady. If that's sexist, then so be it, but I don't feel comfortable when doing so. Male brains are generally conditioned to want to want to please ladies, for obvious reasons. Of course, there are exceptions but they all end up with the same agenda.
Generally I think violence should not be an option, but that can only be put so far. Everyone (read: EVERYONE) has a right to self defence, so basically if someone attacks you from nowhere they cannot use any excuses; the fact is that they assaulted you and put you in danger. It all varies on context, but if it is in retaliation to get yourself to relative safety then it is okay regardless of sex, race, age or anything else. Just don't try to turn the tables the other way.
The whole "Violence Against Women" movement is one of the most sexist I have seen. Battered males are often framed, stigmatised, overlooked and disdained - all because they cannot "rightfully" defend themselves against their attacker. Abusive women should not ever use that well-meaning yet wholly flawed movement to their advantage, that is further emotional and mental abuse. Studies have shown that in some circumstances these women were much smaller than the man, yet they can still inflict a lot of damage. Plus the ratio of male:female victims is not very different.
Put it this way, if you do constantly attack people without being provoked you are scum. Scum has no sex. However, in most situations it ideal to boycott violence but that cannot always be fallen back on.
The whole "Violence Against Women" movement is one of the most sexist I have seen. Battered males are often framed, stigmatised, overlooked and disdained - all because they cannot "rightfully" defend themselves against their attacker. Abusive women should not ever use that well-meaning yet wholly flawed movement to their advantage, that is further emotional and mental abuse. Studies have shown that in some circumstances these women were much smaller than the man, yet they can still inflict a lot of damage. Plus the ratio of male:female victims is not very different.
Put it this way, if you do constantly attack people without being provoked you are scum. Scum has no sex. However, in most situations it ideal to boycott violence but that cannot always be fallen back on.
More than 40% of domestic violence victims are male [http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/sep/05/men-victims-domestic-violence]
Men tend to know how to roll with a punch from their childhood. A lot of women never get that, luckily. That just means men tend to receive more punches before they fall. A simple backhand will fell most women, but they know to stay down. Men need to be beaten into the ground, often repeatedly.
There's a lot worse you can do to a woman than punch her though. And a lot worse you can do to a man.
Emotionless tone here is deliberate. I've seen cases of both and both are sickening.
Men tend to know how to roll with a punch from their childhood. A lot of women never get that, luckily. That just means men tend to receive more punches before they fall. A simple backhand will fell most women, but they know to stay down. Men need to be beaten into the ground, often repeatedly.
There's a lot worse you can do to a woman than punch her though. And a lot worse you can do to a man.
Emotionless tone here is deliberate. I've seen cases of both and both are sickening.
If a Girl is lashing out at a bloke for no reason what so ever and properly laying in to the poor sod, he has every right to fight back.
If I started on a bloke for shits and giggles, I would expect to he punched back, not for them to think, "Oh, She's a Girl, it's OK!".
I hate the way some Women actually think they can get away with, and it's like some right, to lay in to Men when they're being a bit dickish, because they know the Man "isn't allowed to hit them back".
Physical abuse just for the fun of it, or because you're a controlling asshole is wrong from both sides.
If I started on a bloke for shits and giggles, I would expect to he punched back, not for them to think, "Oh, She's a Girl, it's OK!".
I hate the way some Women actually think they can get away with, and it's like some right, to lay in to Men when they're being a bit dickish, because they know the Man "isn't allowed to hit them back".
Physical abuse just for the fun of it, or because you're a controlling asshole is wrong from both sides.
It is normally frowned on but with women wanting more equality, I don't see why it is frown on. I myself am a gentleman and was raised not to hit anyone, let alone a woman/girl. Plus more and more girls are saying that being bumped the wrong way is now abuse so my take on the subject is skewed.
It depends, if the girl is larger then you, and sorry, three pounds doesnt count. Then sure, defend yourself only after trying to difuse the situation verbally. I've come close to clocking a girl. I had my fist balled, but I dont like abusing women really. Only as a last resort if they're hitting you or threatening you with a knife or something.
I remember a thread here where a guy said he ended up in jail for defending himself against his ex when she had a knife. So I would REALLY only recommend it if you can 100% prove you were in the clear and if it was a dire self defence situation.
I remember a thread here where a guy said he ended up in jail for defending himself against his ex when she had a knife. So I would REALLY only recommend it if you can 100% prove you were in the clear and if it was a dire self defence situation.
- Mar 31, 2010
- 7,170
- 143
- 68
- Country
-
- Gender
-
I agree, hitting a girl just seems needless and cowardly to me due the way I've been brought up, I suppose it also helps that my only sister is so much younger than me that she couldn't hurt me if she tried. A man should be able to take a hit from someone weaker, whether they be a woman or a child, without over-retalitating. Restraining them is fine if they won't stop, though that's not a situation I've ever been in before, I haven't felt physically threatened by a girl since I was about 11 or 12.emeraldrafael said:
Hitting a person is bad, ergo hitting a girl is bad. If you absolutely must use violence then yeah, go ahead, but you shouldn't just be hitting people for the sake of hitting people. If you're hitting someone in the first place, regardless of gender, you better have a good reason for it.
But it simply, without gender:
If you are hit by a person, will you be pissed enough to hit back?
Now, why if that person is a girl should that change your decision?
This is coming from a girl. Unless one party is very obviously stronger/weaker, I say it's a fair fight. Swing all you want.
If you are hit by a person, will you be pissed enough to hit back?
Now, why if that person is a girl should that change your decision?
This is coming from a girl. Unless one party is very obviously stronger/weaker, I say it's a fair fight. Swing all you want.
chances are youre still stronger tho.
on the matter: if they want to emancipate its kind of their own fault. i dont realy hit girls generaly, but if theyd hit me for some reason yeah knucklesandwich for you, no remorse for stupid punks girls or boys who cares...
on the matter: if they want to emancipate its kind of their own fault. i dont realy hit girls generaly, but if theyd hit me for some reason yeah knucklesandwich for you, no remorse for stupid punks girls or boys who cares...