martyrdrebel27 said:
Relish in Chaos said:
I don't mean to speak on behalf of them, but isn't that pretty offensive to asexuals? Some people just...aren't interested in sex. It's not that they can't have sexual pleasure; it's just that they're not sexually attracted to men, women, or anything inside or outside. Some can still feel romantic or emotional attraction, just like you can feel something for your siblings or a friend without sexual arousal, and some enjoy sex only when it's to satisfy their partner.
So I wouldn't say there's anything wrong with it. That kind of mindset can also lead people to think, "Oh, maybe you're just gay in denial" or "you should get yourself checked out; everyone should want sex". It's just different, is all. Remember, as recent as fifty years ago, homosexuality was still classed as a disorder, and now, in most civilised areas around the world, it's classed as just as much of a healthy sexuality as heterosexuality, the societal norm which seems to have been even more hammered into our system through media where the guy "gets the girl" at the end of the film.
okay, what i'm about to say here is going to be taken wrong, some people are gonna probably have unkind words to say, but if so, its simply because they either don't understand MY point or they don't understand humanity's point. but here goes...
being gay or asexual IS a disorder. but it's not wrong. let me explain. we are animals, an our brian, whether we like it or not, is wired to make us want to have sex with the opposite gender for the purpose of survival of the species. but the human body and brain is unfathomably complex, and sometimes it doesnt work the way the blueprint laid out. so when someone's brain is not functioning that way, its disordered. THAT IS NOT TO SAY HOMOSEXUALITY IS WRONG. far from it, it's just a genetic trait. tommy has astigmatism, johnny has a cleft pallet, and billy wants to bang tommy and johnny. it's just a variation from what the blueprint intended.
Where did you get the idea that we have sex primarily for procreation? No, seriously. People have been having sex for pleasure for donkey?s years, and the idea that ?sex should be for making babies? only came in when Christianity started demonizing anything that wasn?t unprotected missionary penis-in-vagina sex for the sole purpose of reproduction. If anything, we have sex primarily to build social bonds, and babies could just happen to be a byproduct of that. Not to mention, I think I heard a scientific theory that homosexuality arose from back when men (and women, for that matter; let?s not forget, lesbians exist!) may not have had enough women to go around for them because they?d all been taken up by the more attractive fit men, so they just started to formulate sexual bonds with their own sex. Also, it could be to curb overpopulation (if you think about how many people are having kids now, just imagine how many
more there would be if everyone was straight).
Furthermore, I don?t think you seem to understand what a mental disorder actually is. The technical definition of a medical disorder is a psychological developmental anomaly that is generally associated with stress that negatively impacts on a person?s day-to-day life. For example, OCD, bipolar, generalized anxiety. People only get stressed out if they are gay because of social pressures, rather than any circuitry issue in the brain.
Spanishax said:
krazykidd said:
If i could i would become Asexual ( which ,unfortunatly ,is impossible since Asexuality is not a choice .... I think ).
Don't ever let anyone tell you their sexual preference "isn't a choice". I, myself, am an asexual, formerly heterosexual. I may be heterosexual again, one day, it depends on what happens in my life. But at the moment, I am neither attracted to men nor women, thus I will be indefinitely asexual. It's still a CHOICE - it's ALWAYS a choice - but it's based very heavily in what feels the most right and the most comfortable for me, thus making it seem like it's the "natural" path for myself; like I was born to be this way or something equally silly. This is probably what confuses a lot of people when they change their sexual preferences: they feel like they "can't go back" because they would lose face, and that their preference somehow "defines" them and makes up their personality. That they were "supposed" to be gay/straight/lesbian/bi/pan/etc.
I would recommend you take a stroll through the forums on AVEN to learn more about asexuality, so you might consider the possibility that you are indeed an asexual, but you say you often think about engaging in coitus with members of the opposite sex, ergo I believe you are still straight.
I don?t mean to go off-topic, but?no. Just no. No offence, but as much as some gay people
try to make themselves straight by fucking as many women as possible, you can?t change your sexuality just by waking up in the morning and saying, ?You know what, I like men now? or ?Women no longer turn me on?,
unless, for some reason, you unlocked something that was already in your brain anyway by watching
so much porn that you experimented enough with your sexuality to realise you
were gay or bi,
or you became so desensitised to it (like how humans have become so desensitised to violence because we see it on TV and video games all the time) that you just ?burned yourself up?.
If you?re asexual, but were formerly heterosexual...obviously, you have a different perspective, and I don?t like to make judgements about people who I can never truly know what they?re feeling, it could?ve just been a hormonal change. And as such, you can?t
choose to change your hormones, because I believe that sexuality is primarily determined by hormones, with environment probably being a secondary factor.
But I?ll give you my personal experience for a moment. A while ago (and still even now), I got so bored on my computer that I just ended up watching a lot of gay porn for a while, and although there were some things that peaked my interest (depending on the ?category?), it just didn?t do for me what porn with women did. Part of the reason I watched it was because I wanted to see if I could expand my sexual horizons and discover if I was bisexual, because I was getting a little bored with girls and wanted to see if guys could be sexually attractive too. But nope. On the other hand, I did discover that I had a fetish for transsexuals and ?traps?, so that was nice. But I don?t necessarily identify as bisexual?more like heterosexual bicurious, with a thing for androgyny and kinky blends of surface feminine characteristics with underlying masculine characteristics.
But since sexuality is so much more complicated than we think, I can guess we can never really find a true answer. I mean, there are some people who just like
sex, no matter
who it?s with. I mean, heck, that must pretty much be why
Rule 34 exists, and I know (not personally, though?just online) an artist who draws things from across the spectrum of sexuality and sexual fetishes: straight stuff, gay stuff, trans stuff, lolicon, shotacon, rape fantasy, gore, bestiality, watersports?
Anyway, that?s just my 2 cents. I should be getting to bed now, considering I have a Politics exam in the morning.