Well reasoned, but the dilemma still remains: You said that one should not get overly emotional over minor things (which triggered this whole discussion) but you also said that one should not bottle up their emotions. Suppose that despite finding a creative outlet for their emotions, they still have a hard time dealing with setbacks, big and small. If they should not unleash their emotions (i.e crying) at every setback but at the same time not bottle them up, they find themselves in a tricky situation, as both their options are "wrong". Also, let's add a little spice to make this situation a bit more interesting: Suppose them showing their emotions is causing people close to them harm in some way. Then what? Is it still preferable to not bottle up emotions?Amondren said:Their no pain in the ass its interesting to catch a glimpse at other peoples opinions.
Being overemotional at birth is not something you could control but bottling something up is, given the scenario that someone is overemotional and has something happen that causes them great distress I feel that one should express their emotions. For example if someone had a experience causing them much sorrow I would suggest a creative output such as painting or writing photography, etc. A creative output could be a way for someone to express their sorrow without tear's (not that their's anything wrong with that I too as a human cry). With that they could show how they felt to the world
lesser of two evilsYarpie said:Well reasoned, but the dilemma still remains: You said that one should not get overly emotional over minor things (which triggered this whole discussion) but you also said that one should not bottle up their emotions. Suppose that despite finding a creative outlet for their emotions, they still have a hard time dealing with setbacks, big and small. If they should not unleash their emotions (i.e crying) at every setback but at the same time not bottle them up, they find themselves in a tricky situation, as both their options are "wrong". Also, let's add a little spice to make this situation a bit more interesting: Suppose them showing their emotions is causing people close to them harm in some way. Then what? Is it still preferable to not bottle up emotions?Amondren said:Their no pain in the ass its interesting to catch a glimpse at other peoples opinions.
Being overemotional at birth is not something you could control but bottling something up is, given the scenario that someone is overemotional and has something happen that causes them great distress I feel that one should express their emotions. For example if someone had a experience causing them much sorrow I would suggest a creative output such as painting or writing photography, etc. A creative output could be a way for someone to express their sorrow without tear's (not that their's anything wrong with that I too as a human cry). With that they could show how they felt to the world
Or have I over-analysed this and you are saying that letting your emotions flow is the lesser of two evils in this dilemma?