Lono Shrugged said:
ColdStorage said:
I fully support this proposal. I want to try it on a Humpback Whale or a (karma) Sumatran Tiger.
And just double-check the stationary says ON and not WITH. If Steve Irwin was still alive this would probably have been the only way he could still get off.
But OT: shanking horses because you can't afford to keep them is still wrong. just for the record.
OK, well get me a video of you having sex on the back of a Tiger and a Whale and we have the next Escapist Video series!
OT: Unfortunately, horse's aren't good with drugs such as lethal drugs, it gives them great pain, if given the choice they would probably go for a gun.
Its why humans can deal with Ketamin but horses can't.
If given the choice that is, the OP cannot give his horse the choice because he can't communicate with him/her, if you can't afford a horse, why the hell do you have a horse in the first place?
The cop out argument of "its normal in texas" doesn't wash with me, its part of your family, when I couldn't get food during the London Riots because all the shops were shut, I went hungry and gave my dog my food because he's like my nephews. It was damn good chicken too, Spartacus loved it.