I want to play through TES IV one last time before Skyrim and I've never done it without fast travel (despite the recommendation several times) does it take away from the games overall merit?
Really good point. I may just play it back normally with the fast travel representing what it is, a fast way to travel.Ordinaryundone said:Its tedious, is what it is. I guess some people would call it immersive, but I wouldn't want to walk back and forth across 30 miles of wilderness in real life any more than I would in a game.
That sounds great. I voluntarily do it much like that in Fallout 3 by only fast-traveling between settlements which are on trade routes. I find that to be a happy balance because it reduces the number of tedious journeys between settlements, but preserves the sense of adventure when I go on trips to places that are 'off the beaten path'.wordsmith said:I personally prefered the Morrowind style of fast-travel, in that you could buy passage to certain towns from certain other towns. It felt more... Immersive. You'd have to plan your journey, such as going from Balmora to Ebonheart, you'd get a siltstrider to Vivec, then a boat from one end of the city to the other, then a larger boat to Ebonheart. It actually felt like you'd accomplished something when you arrived in a new place, fresh of the boat (to coin a phrase).