I'm talkin' 'bout Robert Kotick.Souplex said:Shut yo' mouth!joshuaayt said:They say this cat Robert Kotick is a bad mother--
I'm talkin' 'bout Robert Kotick.Souplex said:Shut yo' mouth!joshuaayt said:They say this cat Robert Kotick is a bad mother--
Then I can dig it.joshuaayt said:I'm talkin' 'bout Robert Kotick.Souplex said:Shut yo' mouth!joshuaayt said:They say this cat Robert Kotick is a bad mother--
Sorry, my bad, you're right. Durp moment. But still, Ubi and Acti are making EA look sort of nice at the momentRetardinator said:Isn't that Ubisoft? Or did I miss something big?The Undoer said:Evil? No. Asshole? Yes.
I'm pretty sure Modern Warfare 2 could've been a much better game without Activisions interference, and I might have had a look at Splinter Cell: Conviction.
Only because of their DRM. They at least try to make decent games and not churn out sequels and expensive map packs every week. (Which definitely aren't worth it, I guess)The Undoer said:Sorry, my bad, you're right. Durp moment. But still, Ubi and Acti are making EA look sort of nice at the momentRetardinator said:Isn't that Ubisoft? Or did I miss something big?The Undoer said:Evil? No. Asshole? Yes.
I'm pretty sure Modern Warfare 2 could've been a much better game without Activisions interference, and I might have had a look at Splinter Cell: Conviction.![]()
Sober Thal said:I agree.oppp7 said:I think it's kind of funny how much hate he gets. I mean, even by business standards he's pretty tame. How many companies outsource most of their labor to other countries so they can pay their employees less? Or cut most corners in manufacturing products that there's eventually several deaths and a product recall? As far as I know Kotick has never done any of these things. Perhaps if he was a CEO of a different type of company he would, but then he also wouldn't get much hate anyways.
All I have seen in this thread is name calling. Does anyone have any real examples of how this many is an evil, (insert all the silly names kids call him here) guy?
Just because you didn't like Modern Warfare 2 doesn't give much weight for this name calling. You say he's greedy? I say you sound like jealous children.
I have never seen these stories before. Have you any legit source you are getting your info from? Just because the guy has some fame doesn't mean you can lay any and all wrong doings, that happen around him, at his feet.RelexCryo said:He once told a story ......Kahrooch said:I just read about the Bungie and Activision deal and started to read about Robert Kotick and what he has done and is doing. I was shocked at the things he has said so my question is is he evil or just a greedy people hater?
Another employee in Japan sold videogame rights to franchises even when they had no rights, such as Knight Rider.....
It was an entire company built on the belief that it's okay to do *anything* to get ahead. Even breaking the law.
EDIT: Many people on this thread are making the same mistake Bobby himself makes- you are assuming since many people in Corporate America do this, it's not evil. Just because many people are doing it does not make it "okay" or for that matter, "non-evil."
I get why kids want to think he is the bad guy, but does anyone have any real reasons?
Like I said, Bobby's logic was probably "Hey, everyone's doing it, so it can't be that bad!"Sober Thal said:Please help me be less ignorant. This will require patience on your part, and explaining to me how this makes him evil.RelexCryo said:Sober Thal said:Just because you didn't like Modern Warfare 2 doesn't give much weight for this name calling. You say he's greedy? I say you sound like jealous children.
I get why kids want to think he is the bad guy, but does anyone have any real reasons?RelexCryo said:Kahrooch said:I was shocked at the things he has said so my question is is he evil or just a greedy people hater?
http://magweasel.com/2010/01/18/how-knight-rider-saved-activision-sort-of/
It was in the febuary 2010 issue of Game Informer. You should really get a subscription.
He piggy backed onto a guy who was making money, so his company wouldn't die. Much like people did with the bazillion versions of tetris, I understand that this was against a copyright law or two or all of them, but what was the end result? Was Kotick the sole man responsible, and did he go to jail for these actions? People who break the law pay one way or another, when rich people do wrong to another, they usually pay for it monetarily.
This is something he admitted himself to enlighten people how the industry worked back in the day. If this is the reason people flame Bobby, then I still don't think it's justified.
He is also one of the most highly rated CEO's in the software industry when considering his compensation package with respect to earnings year over year since he took office.JourneyThroughHell said:Nope, he is just a dipshit or at least extremely bad at presenting his own persona.