Maze1125 said:
Martymer said:
Maze, how do you explain the distribution of matter in a universe of infinite size? Shouldn't it be infinitely sparse? To me, it would seem like anything else would require an infinite amount of matter, and thus infinite energy, and since you appear to know your physics, I don't need to keep rambling about that, now do I?
Not necessarily.
It's quite possible that the matter would collect around the point where the original singularity was. Which would allow an infinite universe to have finite matter and positive matter density.
Also, there's no problem with the universe having infinite matter or energy, because in any given bubble of observability the total energy would still be finite.
The original singularity was everywhere. By collecting around "where the singularity was", matter spreads out throughout the universe, fairly evenly. This leads to three possibilities (as far as I can tell):
1) The universe has positive matter density and finite matter, and is finite.
2) The universe has positive matter density and infinite matter, and is infinite.
3) The universe has zero (or infinitessimal) matter density and finite matter, and is infinite. We can strike this one off the list, as... well, as we are here to do so, which we wouldn't be if this were the correct one.
Also, I'm very skeptical about #2. Infinite matter and energy would mean infinite gravity, which would not just cause the expansion of the universe to slow down and reverse, but this should have happened within fractions of a second into its history. We see in fact, that the rate of expansion is increasing instead. To me, only #1 makes much sense.
Another thing I have to ask is, what arguments are there to support the statement that the universe is infinite? You've defended your standpoint by attempting to dismiss my arguments (and you're doing a pretty good job, btw

), but I've yet to see any attempt to support your claim. What is it that suggests the universe is actually infinite?