"You took someone's life, and because of how valuable life is we'll take yours."Wild Cat said:No. To me, it's hypocrisy.
Yup, which calls for a drastic improvement in the justice system prior to trial, but the death penalty is the topic here.stinkychops said:Do you have any idea the number of people who are let go from death row twenty years after their sentance because it is PROVEN they are innocent?Jedoro said:For the first murder, the jury should decide between death or rehab. After the first one, it's automatically death.
Of course, my version of the death penalty isn't wait several years and let them appeal. My version is once found guilty, they're immediately taken to an execution chamber in the courthouse and a cop, soldier, or executioner puts a few bullets into their chest.
I just want 'em out of society so they can't murder people anymore.
Um... I can't work out if that's a compliment or insult. Mainly due to the 'lack of communication skill' part.DoomyMcDoom said:I will say I find you to be a most fascinating conversationalist as you hold your end up without resulting to unneeded inflamation as a result of a lack of communication skill.
on this, I commend you. however, i must sleep. feel free to respond, but know my response may be a few hours in coming.
Kindly calm yourself and don't automatically assume I don't have a valid standpoint on this. Incidentally, if I had a daughter I'd be pretty outraged if someone beat her up also.infinisynth said:Have a daughter and let some guy rape her and get back with me.
This.space_oddity said:And before some Feminazi quotes me saying "Imagine some guy raping you blah blah*, im going to cut you off here and say fuck off. I would rather be raped than murdered or tortured.
I'm slightly confused... The point I was going to bring up was kind of the hypocrisy in getting outraged that someone was murdered and deciding the solution was to murder someone. I don't think I could've been more abundantly clear about my standpoint on revenge (rehabilitation all the way). I don't agree that deterrance is a valid argument, but it's better than 'making them pay' obviously.A random person said:With you on the rehabilitation thing. The people who go to jail are mostly rather impulsive and probably won't be deterred that strongly, and it would be better to rehabilitate them than to keep them locked up. That, and the whole golden rule thing I secularly believe in. Yeah, I know, I'm a softy.
As for that other point you were dying to bring up, I'll hazard a guess and say it's that last sentence you didn't quote saying it's not about the deterrence, it's about making him pay. I couldn't disagree more: deterrence is the only valid argument for the death penalty other than saving money. Taking a murderer's life because you believe in the value of human life is amazingly stupid in my eyes. And this isn't mentioning how punishment should never be "making them pay."
Feel free to correct me via PM if that wasn't the point you wanted to mention. I don't flame people, and we're probably on the same page anyways.