Two things:Char-Nobyl said:Waaaah, waaaaah! I can't defend my position, so I'm just going to discredit the topic!lacktheknack said:It's just a game.Char-Nobyl said:Actually, yes. Yes it does. Because it doesn't suck does mean that it's right unless you can present specific evidence to the contrary. Can you?
Also known as the "I never liked this stupid game anyway" argument.
So in other words, you have no evidence to support your claim? Thought so. Citing reasons why you lack the specific evidence you need to argue a point isn't a substitute for said evidence. Quite the contrary, actually.lacktheknack said:But no, I can't. I don't have enough evidence or even information to draw any major conclusions to the underworkings of the game world, because I only get one perspective for four hours.
Considering that I'm using well-founded theory of logic [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophic_burden_of_proof] I think you're going to need a bit more of an argument than the equivalent of, "And...and also your FACE is stupid!"lacktheknack said:Also, I think your logic is junk.
1. Actually, it's my favorite game of all time.
2. You're looking waaaaaaaaaay too deeply into this. I don't feel the need to research and back up a passing claim I make within the realms of an OPINION THREAD.
What, do you just have a superiority complex?