Is this why people hate the Star Wars prequels?!

Recommended Videos

Coldie

New member
Oct 13, 2009
467
0
0
Exocet said:
I wonder why after knowing how jedis work,the Emperor didn't just inject midichlorians into clone troopers to make them beefed-up force wielding troops(if possible with working,accurate blasters complete with a lightsaber bayonet)...

....Gentlemen,ladies,I believe I'm onto something here.
That would only make sense if midichlorians provided the sensitivity|link|technobabble|whatever needed to wield the Force, which is, frankly, absurd. Midichlorians are Force-vorous symbiotes or parasites, although if they are not actual micro-organisms, they might be just Force-antibodies naturally produced by force-sensitive biological sentients. Injecting a force-insensitive with MCs will, at best, accomplish nothing. You'd need something like the Valley of the Jedi for your Force fix. ;)

Think of midichlorians as natural markers (which is exactly what they were in the movie anyhow). Force sensitivity is the cause, midichlorian infestation is the effect.

The real problem of the first movie was that whole Anakin thing. And Jar-Jar slapstick.
 

Bat Vader

Elite Member
Mar 11, 2009
4,997
2
41
I like the Star Wars prequels. Yes, Jar-Jar was annoying and the love sub-plot between Padme and Anakin in Episode II was a bit boring but overall I thought the prequels were pretty good. In all honesty I like that Lucas explained about the force. It makes a bit more sense.
 

TheGreenManalishi

New member
May 22, 2008
1,363
0
0
They were three films that shouldn't and needn't have been made. And by almost every filmmaking standard they are just terrible. The guy who does the obscenely in-depth YouTube reviews knows exactly why.
 

Doctor What

New member
Jul 29, 2008
621
0
0
The first time I saw Episode Four, I was three. I grew up with the original trilogy, and it was magic. Back then you actually had to know HOW to make a movie, not just tell cardboard boxes: "go here and pretend that you have a giant army coming at you." You also had to use your brain and some imagination. Nothing was spoon fed.

They're two different kinds of movies, and it's unfair to compare them. But, dammit, the new ones just suck!
 

Shoggoth2588

New member
Aug 31, 2009
10,250
0
0
I didn't notice the Midichlorian thing until later on as well and still don't see why that's such a bad thing. It could be used in the future to manufacture Jedi and Sith, ya know? Not so much as an STD but like, as a blood transfusion kind of thing. It also explains why some species like Gamorians are never seen as Sith or Jedi [although an Evil Pig Sith would be neat...like Ganon in the Future]

I didn't like Jar-Jar that much but at least they reduced his role to the point of silence in the other films. Darth Maul was my favorite Sith until I started playing Knights of the Old Republic.

All of this Jedi stuff doesn't even matter in the long run though: You don't need medichlorians to be Mandalorian and we all known they take Bad-Ass to a level those pacifists wouldn't even reach for. All Hail Mandalore!!
 

flaming_squirrel

New member
Jun 28, 2008
1,031
0
0
Terrible acting.
Terrible plot.
Reasonable action.
Shittastic characters.
OH GOD THE ACTING.

That's all I can remember since trying to purge them from my mind, not even seen the third one.
I'm not even a big fan of Star wars in the first place and yet can still see they godawful compared to the originals.
 

Korzack

New member
Apr 28, 2010
173
0
0
Ne'eh, I obviously didn't pay enough attention to the films - never even noticed them talking about Midichlorians - either that, or by that point I was just bored and was day-dreaming about ice creams or whatever. In all honesty, I just don't really see the prequel films as any good. The plots were sadly lacking, performances ranged from average to hilariously bad, and I could almost play a drinking game out of "Okay, who's this strange looking weirdo, and why does everybody fear him?"...Although I will admit, when I first saw episode 3, I did ask "Why does that robot have a smoker's cough?" about Grevious, and I got a pretty good answer. Those 3 films were just overloaded with effects and CGI in an attempt to distract from the foundations, IMO.
 

DefunctTheory

Not So Defunct Now
Mar 30, 2010
6,438
0
0
Because George Lucas seems hellbent on ruining anything he's ever been involved in.

flaming_squirrel said:
Terrible acting.
Terrible plot.
Reasonable action.
Shittastic characters.
OH GOD THE ACTING.

That's all I can remember since trying to purge them from my mind, not even seen the third one.
I'm not even a big fan of Star wars in the first place and yet can still see they godawful compared to the originals.
This too.
 

Superior Mind

New member
Feb 9, 2009
1,537
0
0
I was never a great Star Wars buff. I mean I've always wanted a lightsaber but tell me, who hasn't? The midichlorians thing never bothered me, it never really registered. I suppose thinking about it there is no reason to introduce this midichlorians explination to a question no-one cared about.

But no, the Star Wars prequals blew because:
- Jake Lloyd. When you've got the opportunity to introduce one of the biggest badasses in cinema history you don't give him to the whiney spoiled, (despite the fact he was meant to be a slave,) kid.
- Jar Jar. So much has been said on this guy already but I'm going to extend this to the whole "comic relief" strategy of Lucas. Every attempt at lighthearted comedy fails, Jar Jar's the major example of this but the "comical" droids in later prequels also get a big nod.
- Hayden Christensen. Another poor casting choice. I mean the cast other characters pretty well and in the original trilogy got it right for Vader, why not in the prequels? Another whiney dickhole - look I know we're not meant to like Vader but for his actions not the fact that he's a bitchy little douche-nozzle who's such a damn tool he may as well live in a shed.
- Dialogue. Characters say how they feel instead of this being portrayed in their actions. In the words of the Robot Devil "that makes me feel angry!" Seriously, "you're breaking my heart!", "well in my opinion the Jedi are evil!" Great dialogue, really. A ten year-old could do better than that.
- Too many maaaahriess!
(Kidding. Love you Tem.)

I could go on - which surprises me. I dunno, I guess overall the prequels sucked because of multiple poor choices, of the writing staff, the casting staff and Lucas himself who seemed to want to make Star Wars into some kind of deep space-drama. Thing is all he did was make it crawl up it's own arse.
 

atomicmrpelly

New member
Apr 23, 2009
196
0
0
Hayden Christensen and Natalie Portman can't act.

Why did Anakin age 20 years in between ep. 1-2 when no-one else did? If he'd been older in ep. 1 he would have been able to establish some meaningful relationships with other character, this was a blatent publicity stunt. And Yoda's line "he is too old to begin the training" (meant to foreshadow what he says about Luke) would have actually made sense then...

Jar-Jar Binks is a dick, but the whole slap-stick aspect was all over ep. 1, Like Anakin accidentally winning the entire war single handedly... Again if he'd been older he could have done it deliberately and set up some kind of reputation as being a very powerful Jedi.

Ep. 2 was cheesy and boring and the CGI was dreadful.

Ep. 3 was good but still ruined by H.C. and N.P.

That's my 2 cents... or 5 cents whatever!
 

Spitfire

New member
Dec 27, 2008
472
0
0
Blindswordmaster said:
Read this comic, ignoring the last panel, first then respond.
http://www.egscomics.com/?date=2010-04-26

I never really understood why people hate the new three Star Wars movies, I mean Phantom Menace wasn't great, but they got better with age, and Revenge of the Sith stood out as a great addition to the series. Then I came upon this comic, which explained why some people hate episodes 1, 2, and 3. Is this really the reason?! Are Star Wars fans really pissed off by this?! Really?! This is insignificant to me. I didn't even notice it when I watched Phantom Menace the first few times. Please help me here, I'm completely lost.
That comic plays on the stereotypical Star Wars fanboy, the kind that shits bricks when hearing about midichlorians. But no, that's not the only reason why people hate The Phantom Menance. See RedLetterMedia's review [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxKtZmQgxrI].

Out of the prequels, Attack of The Clones was the one that really pissed me off. Anakin is turned into an angsty teenager, surpassing the level of annoyance he displayed as a kid. Yoda is ruined as a character. The dialogue is allround cringe inducing, and the romance subplot is horribly executed. To top all that, the movie also makes a lot of unnecessary use of CGI, giving a horrible synthetic look to everything.
 

Flames66

New member
Aug 22, 2009
2,311
0
0
I have no problem with the prequels. Midichlorians add a science element to the story that I greatly appreciate.
 

zf6hellion

New member
Dec 24, 2009
95
0
0
I don't know if anyone's already said this because I'm to lazy to read every single post in the thread at the moment but if people are pissed over Midichlorians being some sort "source" for the Force then they really need to take a step back and check facts. You know because midichlorians are only an indicator of Force Sensitivity - that's it, they do nothing else, they don't command the Force, they don't create the Force - they just help people identify higher sensitivity to the Force.

Feel free to call me a Star Wars nerd, I am already aware of that.
 

Cheshire Cat

New member
Sep 26, 2008
281
0
0
Whilst I quite enjoyed the prequels, turning the Awesome Darth Vader into a whiney little emo-***** really got on my nerves. Also I personally hate that Hayden Christensen guy, he is such a piss-poor actor it's unbelievable...
Jar-Jar never really bothered me much.
 

Flames66

New member
Aug 22, 2009
2,311
0
0
PeterDawson said:
Episode 2
Good - Obi-Wan being awesome, Mace Windu announcing the party is over, Yoda in a duel
Bad - Clone plot's giant holes, really painful romance sequences, Christopher Lee's phoned in performance
What plot holes?