Which, one could say, is his "thing."LJJ1991 said:He trashes every game he plays (except for Portal, I guess).
Which, one could say, is his "thing."LJJ1991 said:He trashes every game he plays (except for Portal, I guess).
The twin engines of video game enjoyment are exploration and mastery.Nomanslander said:So after thinking about a lot of his reviews, how he can't stand MP, and how gameplay just doesn't seem to matter to him. Yahtzee from what I've understood is more into narrative and doing different things in games. Doesn't seem to have much interest in the competitive side. For instance the other example I brought up, he doesn't like MP. Now I know not everyone likes MP, and just because you don't doesn't make you a noob, but sucking at it is one reason a lot of people don't like MP.
True true, but thats only because he was alive when games were interesting and innovative, not the same one over and over. Thief is a GREAT stealth game, and brings it up every time there is a stealth segment in a game.Don Savik said:He seems to prefer the oldschool games. He said Bioshock was tripe because it wasn't as cool as System Shock -___- lolwut. Systemshock set it up, but its story and gameplay was horrible in comparison. And he brings up Theif every third review. The only thing he's good for is a good laugh, and pointing out mistakes that game companies make. I don't take his word that seriously.
You want a funny brit who is also GOOD at games and reviews and covers everything from the big name to the indie? Just watch Totalbiscuit, that man is miles ahead of Yatzhee when it comes to presentation.
Jumpingbean3 said:I think you need to look at his reviews again because he doesn't really have a problem with multiplayer itself, he just doesn't like it when games put all the focus on multiplayer because he feels a good single player usually has more lasting appeal (TF2 being the exception) and he talks about gameplay quite a bit (Bionic Commando, Deus Ex, Call of Jaurez (Don't know if I spelt that right), Splatterhouse and many, many more) and he's stated in the past that if he doesn't mention something in his review you should probably take that as something he didn't have a problem with it (plus, he's part critic, part comedian so being positive about something isn't that funny ). Also you have to keep in mind that Yahtzee is more of a critic than a reviewer and so his reviews are more subjective than objective and unless the game is really, REALLY bad he usually keeps the matter of whether the viewers should buy it up to them.Nomanslander said:First off before people make a fuss let me explain my definition of noob. It doesn't mean a casual player, it just anyone that either is new to a game or isn't very good at it. Personally I'm a complete RTS noob, I've played it, I suck at it, oh whew is me, let's move on.
Anyways, after wondering about what game he should be reviewing come this Wednesday, I thought of Dark Souls which honestly I think is one of the best games I've played in a lonnnnggg time. I haven't been this enthralled and yet horrified (by how sheer difficult and nerve wrecking the game is) by a video games since I was 14 played Ghouls and Ghosts. But remembering how Yahtzee reacted towards Demon's Souls, it got me thinking. Right now I'm at Nito which is pretty far in Dark Souls, I ain't a gaming God, but I'm pretty sure Yahtzee couldn't even get that far (Capra Demon is far as he'd get I bet).
So after thinking about a lot of his reviews, how he can't stand MP, and how gameplay just doesn't seem to matter to him. Yahtzee from what I've understood is more into narrative and doing different things in games. Doesn't seem to have much interest in the competitive side. For instance the other example I brought up, he doesn't like MP. Now I know not everyone likes MP, and just because you don't doesn't make you a noob, but sucking at it is one reason a lot of people don't like MP.
So what's the point of asking what if Yahzee's a noob? Well the reviews he does for the games he has difficulty with matter. He trashed Demon's Souls for being hard, he never even attempts to objectively look into MP heavy games. In the end it really doesn't matter if he is a noob or not since he still makes really good observation into games now and then, but still. Is he?
=P
Well i must thank you sir for expanding on my comment as i totally agree.Zachary Amaranth said:*SnipMozza444 said:I'm sure he doesn't have the time to play that far into games... he reviews something ONCE A WEEK.
He did review both Left 4 Dead games (and liked them mostly) and he has stated he liked Team Fortress 2 at one point. The former having both Co-op and competitive options while TF2 is all competitive. So saying he is 100% biased against multiplayer doesn't hold much weight. If the game is supposed to be straight multiplayer without any story then it makes sense. But if there is a story or a atmosphere needed that other people would ruin (like F3AR or Brink seemed to do) then it's going to get a little more hate. Not to mention he makes a good case for games needing to be judged on single player alone. I don't play many multiplayer games and when I do it is with friends of mine who I enjoy playing with, but there is a select handful of titles I do that with. Otherwise, it's mostly single player games and that's what I care more about anyway, as quite a few others do as well, I'd imagine.Nomanslander said:he never even attempts to objectively look into MP heavy games
could be anything from:dfcrackhead said:I gotta ask: MP?