That sucks. =/Fire Daemon said:Damn... I just got a laptop with Vista today.
I'm a very sad panda.
That sucks. =/Fire Daemon said:Damn... I just got a laptop with Vista today.
I'm a very sad panda.
You are a bit incompetent I believe. I cannot afford 8 GB of RAM, nor quad-core 3.0GHz processors. My notebook is a dual-core 1.6GHz with 1GB RAM, and that is why people have trouble with Vista: poor specs and poor pocket-book.Eggo said:See, either some of you are all hideously unlucky or substantially mentally deficient, because I've never run into any of the problems you have all accused Vista of having in the last seven months I've run it (and run it hard into the ground with dozens of sample libraries, effects plugins, and synthesizers simultaneously straining six hard drives, 8 gigabytes of RAM, and four 3.0 GHz processing cores) and I don't consider myself to be very lucky or proficient with computers/OS's.
So which one is it? Unlucky or incompetent?
From what I can see and read about Windows 7, it is Vista, kinda like they tried to do with Windows Mojave, har har har...dizzydogg said:Yeah, the only thing is the new windows is built on the vista core, so its basicaly just a facelift, like XP was 2k with some patches, some tweaks for home user use and a new look.
Khell_Sennet said:My only worry about Win7 is if they go ahead with something they mentioned a lil while back...
That being, they want Microsoft software to become subscription based, like an MMORPG. I for one will not pay monthly/yearly for my OS, even if the combined price of four years use is less than the shelf price today. Why? Because I am not inclined to rent an OS. I have legit copies of 98SE and XP-SP2 complete with CD and CDKeys. At any time, I can install or reinstall this software, because it's MINE. If I'm just subscribing to an OS, I can no longer use it once they decide to cancel support. It's forced upgrading, and as Vista has shown, UNLESS forced, the consumers will not upgrade just because Microsoft wants us to.
Amen to that.Caliostro said:That would be a colossal dickmove... I, for one, would stay at XP if that happened. Buut, let's hope they came to their senses and ditched the idea.Khell_Sennet said:My only worry about Win7 is if they go ahead with something they mentioned a lil while back...
That being, they want Microsoft software to become subscription based, like an MMORPG.
Paying for the OS is one thing, it's like paying for a game but in a larger scale, sort of... But there's a reason I will NEVER play WoW, even if they made the combat worth it and the grinding null. I refuse to "rent" shit, I'll pay for it, but I won't pay to use it. And I especially won't pay FOR it -AND- to use it.
So true, I did the same thing, waited until they fixed it up before buying and its been a joy to use. The 2007 office is vastly superior in layout, the old software runs just fine (fallout + fallout 2 still run and they are 10+ years old), and the security is soooooo much better than XP. Besides which, I run dx10 on games like Clear Sky or Bioshock, which is a nice bonus.fullmetalgamer said:Vista really is not that bad - i have had ZERO problems or issues with it since i started using it (about 1 year after it's intial release) - and all the old software i used with XP (office, photoshop, dreamweaver, flash etc...) all work with it flawlessly - not to memtion my vista machine is 10 x faster than my xp machine (and my vista machine is not a powerhouse by any means)- my brother was the same way - never used vista before and would always say "vista sucks" - i would ask him why and he couldn't give me a reason why - then his old pc broke down and he bought a new one with vista - and now he loves it.... i still dont see why everybody hates it so much - was that 1st year really that bad?
Wait a minute. If Windows 7 is aimed towards gamers...Codgo said:I've heard Windows 7 will be more aimed at gamers this time..
.. about fucking time!! What took you so long?
I bet you still have some free hard drive space though, right?snowplow said:11+ gb hard drive space and assloads of RAM for:
AN OPERATING SYSTEM
OH MY GOD
Exactly. Microsoft started working on a true successor to XP almost immediately after Vista was released. I feel cheated. I can make Vista do what I want it to do; but it was a lot of configuring to make my PC truly a "gaming" system under Vista. The latest games seem to support it a bit better; but a lot of old XP-based (or prior to XP) games have a hell of a time with it.Meangunns said:Vista was just a half finished OS just like ME was a half finished XP.
Heh heh... funny story behind that.Bigfootmech said:All that they really ever need to do is add DX10 functionality to XP. Problem solved - unless they want to keep stealing everybodys money like they are at the moment that is V_V.