The Rogue Wolf said:
Did I say that gamers were that?
You were implying that gamers looking forward to this particular game are "basement-dwelling socially-lifeless manchildren who objectify women." I find it utterly hilarious how you lecture me later on that "kneejerk reactions don't help anything", and yet you have no problem posting such insulting stereotype-ridden language like that. Look, I don't care what games you like or don't like, but insulting fans of games you don't like is just pointless and makes people unable to take you seriously.
The Rogue Wolf said:
What I said was that this game will fuel the stereotype of gamers that other people have.
So what if it does? Why should we care about what other people think of gamers? What business is it of ours? Gamers don't have to fulfill anyone's expectations of what sort of lives they "should" lead. If some people are going to look down on gamers because of their own negative stereotypes, then that's their own damn problem.
Should this game not exist? Should gamers who conform to any negative stereotype of gamers make themselves invisible until those "other people" say otherwise? I know you're going to deny that, but that's the implication I got from your original post.
I don't like developers that re-release the same game every year or two with minimal changes (CoD, most annual sports games, etc). Should I insult or stereotype gamers who like those games? Should I barge onto threads for fans of those games and leave a snide comment to the effect of "And then we'll turn around and wonder why gamers are stereotyped as gullible lemmings who will buy the same game again and again."?
The Rogue Wolf said:
Of course, kneejerk reactions like yours don't help anything either.
And as I said earlier, condescending, passive-aggressive insults like yours don't help anything either. So spare me your lectures about who is "helping" anything. You're the one who started this whole conversation by making such an unprovoked and uncalled-for implication.