I'm curious as to what Bioware is hoping to accomplish with adding multiplayer to Mass Effect 3. Better sales? Are they hoping to conquer the market for 3rd person cover shooters with four co-op missions? That seems... optimistic, to put it lightly.
He means co-op missions for 4 players.DustyDrB said:More News:
It's gonna be four co-op missions [http://social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/323/index/8475946/60#8479199]. Four. And co-op. That's it.
Fable 3 had a pretty decent Coop-system.. Sadly "pretty decent" would be a generous way to describe the game itself.. If not a blatant lie.Shock and Awe said:I think a lot of you are looking at this wrong. I seriously doubt its a Call of Duty style competitive multiplayer. Its probably going to be more in the spirit of Fable's co-op, except hopefully better done.
Derp on me. I didn't even not see the word "player". I read it as "four...player co-op missions" not "four-player...co-op missions". I guess that's what happens when you don't play any multiplayer...and you're derpy in the head.Zhukov said:He means co-op missions for 4 players.DustyDrB said:More News:
It's gonna be four co-op missions [http://social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/323/index/8475946/60#8479199]. Four. And co-op. That's it.
...
OT: Meh. Not the end of the world, but it sounds like a waste of time for all involved.
+1Dendio said:People play call of duty and battlefield 3 for multiplayer. People play Mass effect for single player. Any time making a multiplayer aspect should have been put into furthering/polishing the single player. This feels like metriod prime 2 all over again. Great single player game yet wasted development time on a multiplayer that nobody asked for. The kinect functionality is also unneeded and a waste of development time.