"It's totally okay if the girls are hot!": Hypocrisy and The World

Recommended Videos

masterkang5

New member
Nov 1, 2008
27
0
0
Decided to reply to this one as i thought it was quite significant.

If anything males are less likely to talk about being sexually abused and or racially abused. Past few years its become socially exceptable to for a women to shout racism or sexism but the turning point hasnt really come for males like myself where we can talk about sexism in the face of the media instead of just online.

I'll make another comment (actually on topic) but this was the only post that struck me as significant in the entire thread.Well im willing to begin a rant but the thread so far has been quite mature and people have just accepted they have been wrong or have proven their point more.

EDIT: uh should of put a quote but its pages back now lol
 

masterkang5

New member
Nov 1, 2008
27
0
0
im straight male and i have no problem with gays at all as for watching gay porn im not grossed out about it i know my own anatomy and i know what gay guys do it just isnt my preference for being sexually aroused.I dont see anything strange about it sorry im going to be blunt here basicly the penis enters the butt and gay people enjoy dat i personally dont at all. I havent try'd it but the thought doesnt do anything for me. A few pages back someone said she liked the male in sex just not the penis (sorry if that isnt exactly correct i cant remember) Well i also found that odd but if it works for you then do it as long as it doesnt effect me in the slightest manner.As for watching lesbian porn eh.. i'd much rather watch 1 guy and 1 girl then 2 girls and lesbian porn doesnt do much for me in the act itself i mean if the girls are hot then its a turn on but lesbian sex in itself isnt atractive at all for me. i dont really know how to explain it and i dont understand how sexist and racist people exist. Even so i dont think i could ever turn gay i know my own anatomy but on another man it doesnt appeal at all.Through this thread theres been pages of talk about lesbians maybe im an odd minority but i just dont think theres anything to see. Majourity of it is done with hands. hands being the most dirtiest part of your body infact the penis is easily cleaner then both a male and females hands and i just wanted to ask anyone willing to answere dont they think about that?
 

SoulkeeperX

New member
May 27, 2008
41
0
0
I'll admit, if a pop-up comes up with 2 guys kissing, I would close it out a lot faster than I would with one with 2 chicks kissing. I guess that's just how some brains work.
Gay = Bad
2 Guys kissing = Very Bad
Attractive Woman = Good
2 Attractive Woman kissing = Very Nice!
 

RobCoxxy

New member
Feb 22, 2009
2,036
0
0
Some people are indeed, stupid, and see anything that they do not personally agree with as wrong.

And FUCK.

We voted 2 of them in for European Parliament. I'm ashamed with the UK.
 

JordanMillward_1

New member
May 19, 2009
263
0
0
CoziestPigeon said:
Haydyn said:
Because (straight) guys don't want to see 2 ugly chicks making out, or 2 guys for that matter.

I for one am tired of 2 things, gay bashing, and people complaining about gay rights. A union is just as good as a marriage. Why can't we just all get along and ignore other people's sexual preference?
A union ISN'T though. It's like saying 'we don't want to give you rights, but we have to, lets just not call them rights.'
It's the fact that people care enough to make a difference between straight and gay marriages.
I don't know which country you are from, but in the UK, civil unions and marriages are identical, except one happens in a church and the other doesn't.

All marriages in the UK ARE civil unions. It's just another name for it that has religious significance. In law, and to most people I know, they are interchangable.
 

CoziestPigeon

New member
Oct 6, 2008
926
0
0
JordanMillward_1 said:
CoziestPigeon said:
Haydyn said:
Because (straight) guys don't want to see 2 ugly chicks making out, or 2 guys for that matter.

I for one am tired of 2 things, gay bashing, and people complaining about gay rights. A union is just as good as a marriage. Why can't we just all get along and ignore other people's sexual preference?
A union ISN'T though. It's like saying 'we don't want to give you rights, but we have to, lets just not call them rights.'
It's the fact that people care enough to make a difference between straight and gay marriages.
I don't know which country you are from, but in the UK, civil unions and marriages are identical, except one happens in a church and the other doesn't.

All marriages in the UK ARE civil unions. It's just another name for it that has religious significance. In law, and to most people I know, they are interchangable.
Ack. This is what I was failing to explain. Legally, they are the exact same thing, but it's the principal of it. It is just a prejudice exclusion to have to make a seperate thing all together that serves the same purpose, just so the straight people don't need to let homosexuals partake in their pastime.
 

JordanMillward_1

New member
May 19, 2009
263
0
0
CoziestPigeon said:
JordanMillward_1 said:
CoziestPigeon said:
Haydyn said:
Because (straight) guys don't want to see 2 ugly chicks making out, or 2 guys for that matter.

I for one am tired of 2 things, gay bashing, and people complaining about gay rights. A union is just as good as a marriage. Why can't we just all get along and ignore other people's sexual preference?
A union ISN'T though. It's like saying 'we don't want to give you rights, but we have to, lets just not call them rights.'
It's the fact that people care enough to make a difference between straight and gay marriages.
I don't know which country you are from, but in the UK, civil unions and marriages are identical, except one happens in a church and the other doesn't.

All marriages in the UK ARE civil unions. It's just another name for it that has religious significance. In law, and to most people I know, they are interchangable.
Ack. This is what I was failing to explain. Legally, they are the exact same thing, but it's the principal of it. It is just a prejudice exclusion to have to make a seperate thing all together that serves the same purpose, just so the straight people don't need to let homosexuals partake in their pastime.
Except that marriages are just religious ceremonies, and they are within their rights to refuse to carry out a service if they want. I know lots of people who have had heterosexual marriages, but decided to just have a civil service rather than a religious one because they aren't religious themselves.

It really, really, makes no difference. They're both the same.