SO i'm gonna go with the obvious joke here and ask...."does that mean half life and portal are going to be remade with lens flares?"
And that in and of itself would require a headline announcing that they'd put themselves on the stock market.crimson sickle2 said:Please don't use a title like this unless Valve's stock gets bought out, the current title is very misleading.
Oh yes, Star Trek 2009 was a perfectly decent a from orbit at breakneck at pace.SecretNegative said:Wow, someone is mad.
JJ Abrams is actually one of the few competent action-movie directors active today, a thing that's actually very rare.
No, they'll just have Zen sucked into a black hole, and give the G-man a nonsensical backstory (something to do with a dead wife, and waiting 20 years in a parallel dimension) to explain why he's a baddie.Dalisclock said:So what you're telling me is that there will be an Ep 3, but it will be incredibly anti-climatic and end with all the Half life Characters in a church?
BanicRhys said:The last decade of which was pretty awful, which is why they did a reboot. There wasn't a "good" star trek movie since Nemesis(which is another action heavy flick) and let's face it, both Voyager and Enterprise had great premises but awful, awful executions.SecretNegative said:By destroying over 40 years of established lore and completely disregarding the themes and tone of said "stale" series.Starke said:Well, he's not Scorcese but he managed to take and old and stale Science Fiction series and turn it into an enjoyable action movie.
If it took crazy time travel, a new timeline and a lot of lens flare to make star trek watchable again, so be it.