Teshi said:
Vague comments about how the person was nice, polite, quiet, etc. are pretty much de rigueur in the early media coverage of events of this nature.
Except that's not at all true and it's quite often the opposite. When you're the victim, you tend to get a lot of "that's so sad, they were nice/whatever" but not with the shooters.
Besides, the best evidence to the contrary has now become "well, we don't know that he wasn't" and only then based on the speculation that the comments might be insincere. That's not really a solid foundation for "he was probably trouble already."
NotALiberal said:
He shot his sister and mother, unprovoked, in cold blood. I'm pretty sure that's all you need to deduce that he's "fucked up".
And if that was all he had used to back it up, you might have a point there. However, you either missed or ignored a good chunk of my statement.
Logic isn't your strong suit though (from what I've seen of your posts).
That's rich, coming from someone who had to ignore half my comment to get there. Although that COULD still be logical. It would just be dishonest.
You have the rationality of your typical bleeding heart liberal, which doesn't bode well for you I'm afraid.
Hooray stereotypes!
Perhaps stop following an ideology filled with double standards and irrationalities, and start using your brain.
Do you believe in the bible?
"First remove the beam from your eye, then you will see clearly enough to remove the speck from your neighbour's."
Yeah, I think you should take that to heart rather than try and clear my vision with yours so obscured.