I have no reason not to buy her excuses since she's kinda done it sounded like and kinda took the blame without fighting to protect the jobs of the people working on her show. Also she's just kinda nuts (if you saw the podcast you know) so I don't expect too much coherence out of her.Sonmi said:I did watch her on Rogan, I don't buy her excuses.Dreiko said:Actually, they weren't racist. That's part of the context I mention. When you hear the full context it's not racist but if you lack it it comes off as such which is why I allowed for their interpretation as bad jokes.
Still, in context they were fine.
Anyhow, this is kinda off topic, just go watch her Rogan podcast on youtube for more details~
Also, it would be important to compare the public reaction to the jokes in question. People were genuinely shocked by Roseann's comments, enough for her own castmates to refuse to defend her publicly, the controversy was organic. On the other hand, no one but the politically motivated cared about the Gunn thing, which was, I'll remind you, a directed ideological attempt at causing a fuss.
I just don't see hatred anywhere, jokes being edgy is a normal thing for comedians to do.
If you think hating on Roseanne who was tweeting about trump and who knows what else for years wasn't done by people already politically primed against her I dunno what to tell you lol.
People were shocked cause they're easy to shock and cause it was convenient to be shocked in that timing cause she gave them the excuse they were seeking to get rid of her with and cause some just lacked the context and were tricked by the mass hysteria. They fired her so reflexively that they didn't even have time to get that context. If we use twitter outrage as a measure of offense we're screwed lol. I'd rather use normal logic instead.