They've committed crimes so heinous that the suitable punishment is death. Why is this an issue?
After my years of research of keeping a cat in a closet. I learned that it makes the cat really really angry. This information will benefit everyone in the future, for example, if you want to keep a cat in the closet for years, don't do it.MajoraPersona said:They shouldn't kill them, they should let scientists do tests on them so they can better understand the effects of isolation on the human mind.
I thought jailer was your old job...? Well say hi to the mean people for me.ace_of_something said:Having formerly (and sometimes still) worked in corrections I can say that's outragously overboard. How do you expect someone to not cause you any problems in that situation? What leverage do you have against them? Isolation is used as a punishment of those who break the rules within the faciliity. Not just because.bjj hero said:Death row [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/8247319.stm]
So are these conditions cruel? Does it really matter if you are killing them anyway? Why are executions taking up to 40 years to be carried out?
Your thoughts.
By doing this you put your officers in danger or what if they are granted release? Now what do they do? Go to an asylum.
There is a reason I can sit in a mod with 60 violent individuals and not get the shit kicked out of me (like I am RIGHT NOW) it's cause I talk to them and treat them like people. Even though they don't deserve it.
Yeah...but whaddaya gonna do?George144 said:Oh those wacky Japanese...
Housebroken Lunatic said:Even the ones who are innocent of the accusations against them but they still sit on death row?razer17 said:Nawww poor death row inmates aren't being treated properly. They would have a right to complain were these people not some of the most treacherous people on earth.
No legal system is perfect you know, and a society with a legal system that advocates the death penalty is a society of murderers.
Sure, the police system might not investigate cases of executed felons and actively turn deaf ears and blind eyes towards the possibility of that society having executed innocent people. But innocent people have most certainly been executed for crimes they didn't commit.
That's the problem with the death sentence. It's not like you can just let the accused out from the cell and tell them you're sorry for the mistake. Once you're dead, you're dead, and the blood of the innocent will stain EVERY CITIZEN's hands in that society forever.
Is it worth the state killing of innocent people only to be able to get the real criminals as well? Does the ends justify the means and the consequences of those means?
Life imprisonment is one thing. At least then the court offers the benefit of a doubt and acknowledge the fact that the legal system isn't and can't be perfect, but it's doing the best it can, and that you offer the chance to set an innocent man free if proof arise afterwards that a mistake has been made.
Killing them can only mean one thing, and that is naive behaviour. It means that the court believes that it is flawless...
With you all the way Housebroken Lunatic. Innocents get arrested, they get charged, they get convicted. In countries with the death penalty they get murdered by the state. That's why capital punishment is utterly unforgivable.tellmeimaninja said:Well, my guess is if they did something to earn a death scentence, they deserve it.
This is what I was thinking and I can't say I'm surprised Japan is doing something like this.Standby said:Hey, it's not like the Japs havent done far far worse things to people.
cant find better words than this I guess, though it seems they should have a bit more rights like a book to read or somethingGreyfox105 said:well, if they are on death row...
I can neither support or decry what is happening there.
sums it up. yeesh.sethzard said:this is wrong, making them insane and killing them after they have lost their sanity
That's the whole flaw with Western legal systems. Everyone is innocent until proven absolutely, without any doubt, guilty. The problem is that prisons happen to be full of people who claim to be innocent, which is why nothing gets done quickly. Everyone is looking for an appeal, so the rare false-conviction is lost among all those looking for a second chance. All those on death-row have to wait for it to be proven again and again since nobody will believe a prisoner who claims innocence.Squarez said:What if they're innocent? They usually wait 10-20 years or so before execution, in case new evidence appears, to make sure they're the right person.razer17 said:Nawww poor death row inmates aren't being treated properly. They would have a right to complain were these people not some of the most treacherous people on earth.
Although to be honest they shouldn't be kept around for decades, atleast execute them sooner. Saves money and time for the tax payer/prison system/government