Alright, name 'em. I'd be happy to concede that point if you can point somebody out who is even as remotely insane as the rabbi in question.lacktheknack said:Actually, raving lunatic atheists would (they do exist). You basically said "our raving lunatics are better than your raving lunatics", to which I can only lolwut.thethingthatlurks said:And shit like this is the reason why I oppose all religions. Even if 99.9% of all practitioners of a given religion are perfectly sane, well functioning members of society, the remaining 0.9% tend to be this sort of raving lunatic. Religion is used way too often as a justification for abhorrent and insane behavior, so why not outlaw it? You won't find atheists in this day and age who would order children to stone a dog for some reason that defies all common sense. Perhaps a padded cell is in order here?
Anyways, the court seems like a decent padded cell unto itself. This bizarre story hasn't affected YOU at all.
Cakes said:Education is also a basic human right, which groups like the rabbi's court in question tend to ignore. Don't like my opinion of religion? Fine, but I will always and quite vociferously proclaim this: I'd rather deny all the right to religious expression than to have a single person mentally enslaved, abused, neglected, tormented, or stifled by such a barbaric and vacuous institution.henritje said:The story is almost complete bullshit, but good luck violating basic human rights anyway.thethingthatlurks said:And shit like this is the reason why I oppose all religions. Even if 99.9% of all practitioners of a given religion are perfectly sane, well functioning members of society, the remaining 0.9% tend to be this sort of raving lunatic. Religion is used way too often as a justification for abhorrent and insane behavior, so why not outlaw it? You won't find atheists in this day and age who would order children to stone a dog for some reason that defies all common sense. Perhaps a padded cell is in order here?
Also, dearest Microsoft: Your obnoxious ads have convinced me to never buy your bloody phone. Just want to point that out...
I wouldn't call a powerless self-appointed "court" that need feckless children to do their bidding in any way "the highest part of society", this is just a clubhouse for prima donnas to be pedantic over religious interpretations of the scripture and with way too much mysticism as well.lostzombies.com said:Nice to see logic and intelligence is still alive an well in the highest parts of society in the Middle East...
Religion isn't a basic human right. Basically the only "human" rights we have is to hunt, fuck protect ourselves and our young. Everything else are rights of being a part of a society. Yet I agree with Lurks Religion is a basically a source to all problems even with a majority of people that practice it are "normal". Who do we notice through all the normal its a batshit crazy fuckers that abuse the name of the religion or their own means. Those people make all the other people that practice it look bad leading to blind hatred, war and poor dogs getting rocks tossed at it.Cakes said:The story is almost complete bullshit, but good luck violating basic human rights anyway.thethingthatlurks said:And shit like this is the reason why I oppose all religions. Even if 99.9% of all practitioners of a given religion are perfectly sane, well functioning members of society, the remaining 0.9% tend to be this sort of raving lunatic. Religion is used way too often as a justification for abhorrent and insane behavior, so why not outlaw it? You won't find atheists in this day and age who would order children to stone a dog for some reason that defies all common sense. Perhaps a padded cell is in order here?
Right to education is not a warrant to attack "ignorance".thethingthatlurks said:Education is also a basic human right, which groups like the rabbi's court in question tend to ignore.
Ah sitcom logic will you ever fail us.The Random One said:We are all going to be feeling very silly when the dog manages to get out of the stoning by using a complex legal loophole... that only the deceased lawyer knew would work.
Then it's fast track to Hollywood. [JEWISH NAME], DOG ATTORNEY.
I did wonder about that...Nieroshai said:i seriously doubt the authenticity of this story for several reasons:
1. The Jewish faith does not recognize reincarnation theory.
Welcome to this story making claims about Judaism that are not true.Jakub324 said:Welcome to why I think religion is no longer relevant.
Poor bloody dog xD The appropriate way is to just let it go xD Dog hasn't done anything, leave it alone. Crazy Mid-Eastern Lawyers! You're suppose to be the sensible people among the masses xDlostzombies.com said:"It was ordered... as an appropriate way to 'get back at' the spirit which entered the poor dog," the paper reported the manager as saying, according to Ynet."
haha, that's hilarious man.lostzombies.com said:Yes, yes I'm sorry; your religious extremists are much nicer than any other religious extremists. It's not a popularity contest dude, there is no million dollar recording contract for the winner of X Factor-Religious Nutjob 2011.AoGenius said:Also, while I'm not praising what the religious extremists are doing here, I think it's quite different, quite very very different, than what Islamic extremists do in the rest of the world.
Not the most effective retort against a Jewish court.Marik2 said:LOL I wish someone came up to them and said
He who is without sin may cast the first stone
ba dum tish![]()