Or his front garden does at least. Have a read: http://uk.news.yahoo.com/4/20090917/ten-manure-dumped-on-jeremy-clarkson-s-l-ea4616c.html
Anyone else think this is pathetic? I think the majority have accepted climate change, and his views that he puts on Top Gear about climate change are clearly affected by some degree of spin for entertainment purposes. And what's dumping a load of horse crap going to do? Except make the campaigners (all 7 of them) look stupid.
I'm betting they got a big bloody truck or something similar to dump it there as well, so that's very economical and obviously not a waste of anybody's time. I don't think they should suffer any consequences particularly, but there's campaigning and then there's 7 people being petty for no reason what so ever.
What do you guys think? I appreciate this may be more inclined to British people because I don't know how prolific Jeremy Clarkson is in the States and other countries.
Oh and if my memory from my history lessons last year serves me correctly, the suffragettes were the violent women's rights group so:
1) Why are they dressing up as campaigners for women's rights when they want to 'talk' about the environment?
and
2) Dressing as the violent of the 2 major campaign groups from that time (the others being the Suffragists) is probably not the best way to present yourself.
Anyone else think this is pathetic? I think the majority have accepted climate change, and his views that he puts on Top Gear about climate change are clearly affected by some degree of spin for entertainment purposes. And what's dumping a load of horse crap going to do? Except make the campaigners (all 7 of them) look stupid.
I'm betting they got a big bloody truck or something similar to dump it there as well, so that's very economical and obviously not a waste of anybody's time. I don't think they should suffer any consequences particularly, but there's campaigning and then there's 7 people being petty for no reason what so ever.
What do you guys think? I appreciate this may be more inclined to British people because I don't know how prolific Jeremy Clarkson is in the States and other countries.
Oh and if my memory from my history lessons last year serves me correctly, the suffragettes were the violent women's rights group so:
1) Why are they dressing up as campaigners for women's rights when they want to 'talk' about the environment?
and
2) Dressing as the violent of the 2 major campaign groups from that time (the others being the Suffragists) is probably not the best way to present yourself.
