I don't know if a responsible unbiased game reviewer with an opinion respected by anyone would dismiss Dynasty Warriors as "just a button-masher". But the afore-mentioned reviewer would also have some historical perspective and context - and on THOSE marks, Dynasty Warriors comes out as one of the more pernicious plagues of the modern gaming landscape. The cowardly, craven, unimaginative spam-repeat of a once-successful title just for the loot.
I loved Dynasty Warriors 2 (I actually liked the side-scrolling arcade too, but that was a true Golden-Axe model, and bore little resemblance to everything 2-and-after) and I played several more (through 5 and some of the intermediate steps too). At each stage of its non-evolution I found the same game that I would otherwise love.....if I hadn't alreay played it a dozen times before.
So yeah, any one DW is a great game by itself. But when you set it in context next to its ancestors it's kind of disappointing.
I loved Dynasty Warriors 2 (I actually liked the side-scrolling arcade too, but that was a true Golden-Axe model, and bore little resemblance to everything 2-and-after) and I played several more (through 5 and some of the intermediate steps too). At each stage of its non-evolution I found the same game that I would otherwise love.....if I hadn't alreay played it a dozen times before.
So yeah, any one DW is a great game by itself. But when you set it in context next to its ancestors it's kind of disappointing.