To be blunt the problem seems to be left wingers realizing they can get attention by screaming "racism", "sexism", and other things when it comes to video game and media companies. These people generally also represent a relatively small percentage of the population, and do more harm than good. For example in looking at that picture the guy in the pink suit's facial features seem to be Asian, probably Chinese, The Chinese also happen to control Tibet. The haircut and loud suit are the kinds of things you tend to see in Chinese organized crime culture, and being surrounded by weapons, the whole thing made me think he was either some kind of foreign crime lord in Tibet, or perhaps some kind of military agent affiliated both with the government and organized crime. It also did not seem like it was intended to be a positive portrayal just in the way the whole scene is conveyed. The biggest problem here is that the liberals complaining about this are kind of shooting themselves in the foot, because ethnically speaking this was a fairly tasteful depiction, but people jumped immediately at the light skin tone and assumed that person must be white,
without really looking at the facial features, which aren't exaggerated at all. Albeit it becomes most obvious when you view the picture from a medium distance, and I think the guy actually looks more Chinese the further away you are from it, probably intended to primarily be seen and get attention from a game store shelf or something. On a lot of levels what liberals seem to be saying, counter-productively I might add, is that they want obvious racial stereotypes because otherwise they can't tell ethnicities apart and know who to get upset with. It says a lot that there is a racial outcry and attacks on this being some kind of pro-white piece, only to have Ubisoft rather crushingly point out that he wasn't white. This is probably the biggest backfire left wing outcry has had in a while, not that it will likely be accepted or slow things down much, because people love their rants and to bandwagon when someone points at a potential bad guy.
Otherwise, I actually think most "racist" video games "Ubisoft", "Resident Evil 5", etc... tend to be quite the opposite. For the most part they show the world as it is. Outside of the first world you run into tons of uneducated people living in relatively primitive environments where the things we take for granted aren't available. Many of these people probably also suffer in the intelligence department as well as the educational one due to life long malnutrition (a big issue internationally) which can apparently stunt intellectual development according to some of the things I've read from global food banks talking about the problem. What's more harsh, brutal, environments tend to breed a harder group of people. To me it's kind of odd when you have some left winger (as much as I dislike using that term in this particular discussion) ranting about "first world problems" and talking about how horrible things are in the second and third world where the people are living like this while we argue about video games and IP laws. When it comes to some larger countries like China, it becomes an even touchier subject because on one hand you have huge, modern, cities as good as anything in the first world, but then also horrible poverty with people sharing dog cages, or being forced to live among their livestock. China would of course prefer to present themselves as a modern country, but it's one with multiple faces where it can go from first world civilization to third world barbarity fairly quickly.
As a result when your doing a game set in the second or third world, it's not unreasonable to see people running around who aren't white, who happen to be uneducated, extremely violent as a matter of survival, and in many cases dealing with physical and mental problems as a result of malnutrition, and the long term effects of various untreated medical conditions. That's not really racist, that's kind of how things are. You don't need to visit places like "Stormfront" to see this kind of thing, groups like "The National Geographic Society" are big on showing other parts of the world, and various aid and humanitarian groups sell the conditions there and long term problems in order to get aid and manpower to try and intervene. At the end of the day though things like third world pirates, warlords, and of course organized crime synidicates and/or cartels (some of which aren't entirely criminal) exploiting these people are a problem. How bad life sucks for these guys doesn't much matter if they happen to be waving a gun in your face for whatever reason.
To me racism would be if you were to say these people are genetically inferior to whites or whatever. In reality a lot of the problems are economic and environmental (and not easily solved). Any one of these people would be just fine and competitive with people of any other ethnicity if he was say born and raised in the US, got early vaccinations, decent food, medical care, and education. Most video games though deal with "exciting" situations, in say Far Cry 3 for example the protagonist was pretty much isolated on a third world island, and those ethnic types people complained about were a bunch of pirates, or natives who were largely isolated from the rest of the world.
The point here is that I don't think we've seen much racism here, the complaints against Ubisoft in particular didn't seem especially valid to begin with with Far Cry 3. The problem with "Far Cry 4" seems to be people looking for a fight, and scoring an epic fail when they tried to jump to wild conclusions and failed.
That's my thoughts, not that I expect them to be popular. Honestly, I'm not a huge "Far Cry" fan, I played "Far Cry 3" but had some problems with it on my computer, and really didn't find the bad guy offensive in any racial way, he seemed like a pretty typical action movie bad guy. Given that pretty much every NPC was at least mildly surreal and insane (which was the vibe they seemed to be going for), to say nothing of our protagonist and some of his friends, I can't see how anyone can level a lot of cricisms on that one. Especially seeing as the first thing they do is kill off "stereotypical white action guy" in the first fifteen minutes, and our "hero" winds up being pretty much exploited and kicked around for quite a bit it seemed.
