Focusing on pathos and swearing to emphasize an argument does not make you insightful. Of course I prefer the proponents of a particular view to be passionate and involved with the subject at hand but in this case it just twists and contorts and reduces the show to utter mediocrity.
He never actually puts forward a valid argument. No differentiating two mediums by their origins by the way must be the most redundant argument I have ever heard as there is no further step beyond that statement. Gaming is defined by interactivity not that Nintendo did something in the 80s. The reason people compare VGs and films is because of them both being visually dynamic mediums and often work with the same methods of putting forward a story.
Let's be honest, a cut-scene is a short film and if the scene or level is only vaguely interactive as is the case with parts in the CoD games it's valid to ask whether this is significantly different from a movie.
You can't both claim that games shoudn't be compared to films and then say they are better.
He never actually puts forward a valid argument. No differentiating two mediums by their origins by the way must be the most redundant argument I have ever heard as there is no further step beyond that statement. Gaming is defined by interactivity not that Nintendo did something in the 80s. The reason people compare VGs and films is because of them both being visually dynamic mediums and often work with the same methods of putting forward a story.
Let's be honest, a cut-scene is a short film and if the scene or level is only vaguely interactive as is the case with parts in the CoD games it's valid to ask whether this is significantly different from a movie.
You can't both claim that games shoudn't be compared to films and then say they are better.