Joss Whedon Looks Back Over Dollhouse

Recommended Videos

Eruanno

Captain Hammer
Aug 14, 2008
587
0
0
Hmm, I haven't actually seen Dollhouse, if I had I might've been angrier.
But the monkey-brains over at Fox aren't known for their intelligence when it concerns... uh... anything relating TV. As portrayed in the first minute or so of this video clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEiJ3QA4kKs

(THEY CANCELLED FIREFLY AAAAARRRRRRGGGHHH)
 

pantsoffdanceoff

New member
Jun 14, 2008
2,751
0
0
Arsen said:
Thank God. This show was horrible, Dushku was a horrible actress, and it was more proof that modern day film makers and all the sorts don't know how to make quality shows.

Let's not jump on the blame Fox band wagon again.
I would have to agree, I can't really blame FOX for dropping a bad show.
 

Chipperz

New member
Apr 27, 2009
2,593
0
0
Damn, I fucking loved Dollhouse. Except the FBI agent who just kept pissing me off with how stupid he was.
 

robrob

New member
Oct 21, 2009
49
0
0
The show managed to average 3-4 million viewers for it's first season (which isn't great for a fox show) then dropped to around 2 million for the second season. Like the show or not, people weren't watching it and television (fox least of all) has never been about creativity and high production values, it's about profit. I find it hard to be sad for Whedon, just like everyone else in the industry, you have to roll with the punches.

And SG-1 was never that popular, it peaked around 2.5m viewers. However, that's the advantage of being on a smaller network and having a good plan for the show, they syndicated it everywhere and made enough money to keep it going. I also imagine they had a lower budget than Whedon gets though.
 

jackanderson

New member
Sep 7, 2008
703
0
0
Shame. I've just been watching season 1 on ITV4 here in the UK, and am really getting into it. Yeah, it takes a while to get going, but when it goes...

I hope ITV4 shows Season 2 soon, I'm going to miss Joss Whedon programming. But hey! 24's back next week! And I have Season 2 of Breaking Bad in the planner.

As for those who say Firefly was cancelled before it's time... I'd disagree. Watching it back now and seeing the movie I think it piled in enough greatness to make it's short impact in me last longer than multi-season shows like South Park.

Besides, if you were to bring it back after the ending to the movie... it just wouldn't feel the same. Those who've seen it know what I mean.
 

Zivlok

New member
Dec 12, 2008
115
0
0
I'm not too sad about Dollhouse being canceled this way. I personally loved Dollhouse, and the past few episodes have been absolutely amazing. And it feels like they'll be able to actually wrap up the story, which is all I want, unlike Firefly, which just... ended. Sure, there was Serenity, but still, it's nice to have everything tied-up in just one media.
 

Lord George

New member
Aug 25, 2008
2,734
0
0
I thought we learnt our lesson with Fox over the Firefly incident Mr Whedon, regardless hopefully now he can get back to what's important namely more Dr.Horrible.
 

Sylocat

Sci-Fi & Shakespeare
Nov 13, 2007
2,122
0
0
For the record: The reason the show took so long to get going in the first place was that FOX was demanding script rewrites, trying to push for a more episodic format. Just like they did with Firefly, they scrapped the pilot and forced him to write a dumbed-down one to avoid scaring off new viewers with the complex themes that the show was supposed to have been exploring since day one.

Mairsil the Pretender said:
Given that he's tried numerous times with fox, I have the feeling that Whedon is somehow blacklisted by every other network for some reason. he wouldnt keep going back to those bastards if there was any other option.
Frank_Sinatra_ said:
Like picking a shitty producer like FOX? I'm sorry, but I have never felt sorry for Joss when he chooses an idiotic producer for his shows.
Don't get me wrong, I like me some Joss Wheadon, but what I don't like is him choosing bad producers and getting his shows cancelled.
Trivun said:
Why the hell does Whedon keep going back to Fox? He comes up with great stuff, most notably Firefly (in my opinion anyway), and then they keep cancelling his shows? Fox obviously don't appreciate him, so why doesn't he just take his work to another big network like ABC, NBC, PBS (no, scratch that last one...), or the like? Somewhere where he's more likely to get some decent support and whatnot...
Joss Whedon did not "choose" FOX, nor is there any obstacle for his shows to be picked up by another network.

The reason Dollhouse was on FOX was that Eliza Dushku had signed a contract with FOX to have her own show. There was no clue as to what this show would be, they hadn't even brought in any writers yet. Dushku asked Joss to write it, and Joss agreed. They did not go around pitching this show to other networks, the show was created after the contract was already signed.

robrob said:
The show managed to average 3-4 million viewers for it's first season (which isn't great for a fox show) then dropped to around 2 million for the second season. Like the show or not, people weren't watching it and television (fox least of all) has never been about creativity and high production values, it's about profit. I find it hard to be sad for Whedon, just like everyone else in the industry, you have to roll with the punches.
For the Friday Night Death Slot? 3-4m is fantastic for a TV show on Friday nights.

And SG-1 was never that popular, it peaked around 2.5m viewers. However, that's the advantage of being on a smaller network and having a good plan for the show, they syndicated it everywhere and made enough money to keep it going. I also imagine they had a lower budget than Whedon gets though.
I don't know what SG-1's budget was, I'll have to look that up, but I do know that Dollhouse was one of the lowest-cost sci-fi shows on TV, and it was (and still is) selling great on DVD.

FOX Broadcasting Company are morons. They didn't broadcast Epitaph One (and don't give me that "contractual red tape" bullshit, if they really wanted to run it, they would have), and therefore they had to pay for it (as opposed to the advertisers paying for it).

Meanwhile, 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment (the DVD division) loves Dollhouse, because the DVD of season 1 is selling great (NOTE: The first-week DVD sales for a "genre show" are rarely enough to show up on the Billboard Charts. Dollhouse did so for three weeks, then it continued to sell week-in and week-out, and it's STILL selling great overseas).

And Fox Broadcasting's reaction: "So, we're going to slash the episode budget because you made 'Epitaph One' for half a regular episode's cost ($650k vs. $1.3m), and it was the most popular and best-reviewed episode of the show so far (and you made it without us sticking our big fat fingers in every orifice). Oh, and we're not even going to pay that, we'll only commission season two if 20th Century picks up most of that."

Which 20th Century did. Because the DVDs were selling great and they wanted this 13-hour advert for S2 DVDs to continue (if the numbers weren't there, they wouldn't have done that).

So, they wound up with a show that cost them virtually nothing, that had a small but VERY loyal fanbase, that sold great on DVD.

And they buried it. They slashed the marketing for the show, and decided to yank it for all of November sweeps without warning.

Brilliant, huh?
 

Sylocat

Sci-Fi & Shakespeare
Nov 13, 2007
2,122
0
0
EDIT: To avoid cluttering the thread, I'm combining my posts into one long rant.
 

Littaly

New member
Jun 26, 2008
1,810
0
0
Dollhouse was OK, but not even close to Firefly (but then again, what is), I never really bothered to watch season 2.

Too bad to see it shut down, but on the bright side, Joss is of to do new stuff ^^
 

Xanadu84

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,946
0
0
I really liked Dollhouse. It started a bit slow, but it kind of had to. It dealt with some pretty hefty concepts, and if you gloss over a few low point, was filled with some absolutely awesome ideas. However, I think the series is ending pretty well. I would prefer slightly rushed to drawn out into oblivion. Dushku got a bit annoying for me, and I'm not so sure she was a good cast, but she also wasn't a bad one. Also, got to see Tudyk as a God complex Serial Killer, and Summer Glau at her absolute creepiest. Also, as I feel obligated to do in every thread related to Dollhouse...


Damn...
 

JaredXE

New member
Apr 1, 2009
1,378
0
0
I hope Whedon has learned his lesson and will avoid Fox like the plague.

Oh sure, lets have crappy reality shows go into their infinite seasons, but actual good shows are such a drag.
 

JaredXE

New member
Apr 1, 2009
1,378
0
0
robrob said:
The show managed to average 3-4 million viewers for it's first season (which isn't great for a fox show) then dropped to around 2 million for the second season. Like the show or not, people weren't watching it and television (fox least of all) has never been about creativity and high production values, it's about profit. I find it hard to be sad for Whedon, just like everyone else in the industry, you have to roll with the punches.

And SG-1 was never that popular, it peaked around 2.5m viewers. However, that's the advantage of being on a smaller network and having a good plan for the show, they syndicated it everywhere and made enough money to keep it going. I also imagine they had a lower budget than Whedon gets though.
Did you ever see any advertising for the show on Fox? And what time did it air? The target audience for the show was an age group that is NOT usually at home watching tv on a friday night, which is when Dollhouse aired.

I'd be interested in what the figures were if you took into account internet viewing.
 

Frank_Sinatra_

Digs Giant Robots
Dec 30, 2008
2,306
0
0
Gruchul said:
Frank_Sinatra_ said:
Hell Stargate was on MGM, and even though not a lot of people know about it (I'm talking about SG-1 and Atlantis mind you) it was an incredibly successful show.
SG-1 was a huge and well-known show with a big following so I'm not really sure where you're coming from here.
Well being the resident Stargate NERD here, I can affirm to you that; No. Stargate wasn't very well known at all.
Sure it's well known NOW but what about during season 3, 5, or 7? Not so much. Stargates fame came from Atlantis actually when the show was being heavily commercialized. The Stargate fan base mostly grew from peer to peer recommendations.

Brad Wright (Co-Creator) said:
"We were off the radar for so long. [...] We were like the slowly burning candle. We're not a huge hit by any means. We're a nice little show that does well and makes MGM a lot of money."
Robert Cooper (Executive Producer) said:
Regarding how Stargate as a show was ignored. "By the way, neither did the original 'Star Trek' in its time, It wasn't until 30 years later that people started looking back at it and realizing it was a milestone. I think we secretly hope that 10, 15, 20 years from now, that 'Stargate' will be considered in the same way."
I think I've made my point.
 

Tich

New member
Aug 13, 2008
159
0
0
Sylocat said:
I think I read somewhere that the budget for an average episode of SG1 was around a million dollars. I think I read that on Joseph Mallozzi's blog (who writes for SG1, SGA and SGU). But don't quote me on that though.