Alleged_Alec said:
Now let's place it in content: he was just called crazy by someone and he responds sarcastically with an obviously hyperbolic statement. It may have been stupid, but the stupidest thing about it was that he didn't take refuge in audacity enough.
So, should Mike Tyson have been brought to trial for saying "I will eat his heart, I will eat his children"? That's obviously a threatening statement as well.
What do you think is going to happen here... that I'd suddenly "Well, no, not Mike Tyson! I like him...". Of course he should've been punished. I mean, it's the same thing but with "internet balls" replaced with "famous balls". Just because he THINKS it's okay to be said doesn't actually make it okay to be said.
And the context? That's like trying to say "But officer HE MADE ME threaten that school full of children." Sorry, but no, the kid chose to say the most offensive and horrendous thing he could think of to a plain and simple insult. "Officer! He called me dumb so I backed him up by saying I was going to throw a baby into a top-loading washing machine! I don't the see the big deal!"
Btw... the true comparison would be if Mike Tyson had said "I will eat his children" right after someone just ate a child.
Why are you trying so hard to justify bad behavior? Just because the reaction is extreme? It's okay for the kid to be offensive as he possibly can to anybody he wants because they took his punishment too far?
Maybe bad on the judge (depending on the outcome) but first-and-foremost BAD ON THE KID!