Just a Rumor: Fallout 4 is in Boston

Recommended Videos

matrix3509

New member
Sep 24, 2008
1,372
0
0
evilneko said:
Jove said:
evilneko said:
So, here's hoping it's actually post-apocalyptic, unlike the last one.
True dat. NV felt nothing like living in a post-apocalyptic setting, especially with a city like vegas still intacted (somehow).

Oh, and sorry to disappoint obsidian fans, but Bethesda is developing Fallout 4. Deal with it. ;)
And I'm glad. I liked the story of Fallout 3 better than lolimgunnahuntdownthedudethatshotme.
Wait a minute. You liked the "lol I'm gonna follow my dipshit dad for no reason then kill myself for even less of a reason" better than deciding the fate of one of the last power source in the country? Fucking lol.
 

TheDrunkNinja

New member
Jun 12, 2009
1,875
0
0
Ultratwinkie said:
evilneko said:
So, here's hoping it's actually post-apocalyptic, unlike the last one.
Oh right because nothing says "fun" like no progress EVER.

And gamers say they're sick of copy-pasted games.
Note: Considering the description I've read of the Institute (incredible leaps in technology and science abound, possibly to a terrible end), it's entirely possible to please both parties--surviving post-nuclear disaster and humanity's progress after the end of the world. Thus, your complaint has already been given a solution.

Unless your problem actually lies in the fact that your perception of what makes the "spirit" of the Fallout series doesn't line up with what Bethesda offers, then I can't help you, sir.
 

TheDrunkNinja

New member
Jun 12, 2009
1,875
0
0
matrix3509 said:
evilneko said:
Jove said:
evilneko said:
So, here's hoping it's actually post-apocalyptic, unlike the last one.
True dat. NV felt nothing like living in a post-apocalyptic setting, especially with a city like vegas still intacted (somehow).

Oh, and sorry to disappoint obsidian fans, but Bethesda is developing Fallout 4. Deal with it. ;)
And I'm glad. I liked the story of Fallout 3 better than lolimgunnahuntdownthedudethatshotme.
Wait a minute. You liked the "lol I'm gonna follow my dipshit dad for no reason then kill myself for even less of a reason" better than deciding the fate of one of the last power source in the country? Fucking lol.


This is why I love Fallout threads on this site.

Split right down the middle...
 

sb666

Fake Best
Apr 5, 2010
1,976
0
41
Country
Australia
Hopefully they leave the east coast to Obsidian, and Bethesda can screw up Fallout in the west coast.
 

Spygon

New member
May 16, 2009
1,105
0
0
Soviet Heavy said:
Here is hoping they get someone other than Bethesda to write the game. Like Obsidian.
Yes so we can have another game where they retcon that seemed to show the break down of the laws of physics (bugs) caused the Apocalypse instead of nuclear war.

Did people forgot that new Vegas was such a buggy mess.
 

EHKOS

Madness to my Methods
Feb 28, 2010
4,815
0
0
Mcoffey said:
I'm so tired of Bethesda's "New location fuck everything that happened in the last game" notion of story telling. Why not develop your setting a little, hmm? Maybe offer some growth, changing faction dynamics, new threats, old problems resurfacing? It isn't that hard. I don't care about Boston, but I wouldn't mind seeing what happens next in the Capital Wasteland. I would fucking love to see what happens next in the Mohave or just the West Coast, if you get Obsidian to make it again.

Whatever. If it's anything like Skyrim it will probably be disappointing as hell anyway.

EHKOS said:
Wow, Mass sounds fucking boring. I've never been there but I've never heard of anything really interesting there. And it's so close to D.C. I don't believe it, it's not Fallout without huge landmarks.
The Departed? A lot of the civil rights stuff happened in Massachusetts. Has fuck all to do with Fallout, but stuff did happen there.
True, but it just doesn't seem as...prolific as the others. Vegas with it's bright lights, D.C. with all the history and important buildings. But, it could be really cool, idk.
 

DustyDrB

Made of ticky tacky
Jan 19, 2010
8,365
3
43
evilneko said:
So, here's hoping it's actually post-apocalyptic, unlike the last one.
People seem to forget. Post-apocalyptic means it's after the apocalypse. People have moved on and rebuilt. The series is about the society that emerges after the apocalypse is over, not about the immediate aftermath in which people still are trying to figure out the basics of how to survive.
 

StormShaun

The Basement has been unleashed!
Feb 1, 2009
6,948
0
0
It sounds nice, there are always better places but this sounds pretty good.

Hopefully the story would be kick ass like Fallout 3 or Fallout.

I hope that they have more/newer gameplay too. I would like the idea of dual wield weapons, low level strength are weapons and pistols and higher the strength you get to dual wield machine guns, swords and other weapons. It would be nice. :D
 

TheDrunkNinja

New member
Jun 12, 2009
1,875
0
0
Ultratwinkie said:
Bethesda does the old "America is a utopia lost" crap that only appeals to nationalists who post "rallies" to rebel against the liberal government and stockpile guns by the crate-load. At least the old games knew America sucked, and didn't pander to American egos.
Okay... I'm surprised I have to ask this... but do you know what the word "satire" means?

You do realize that exact nationalist fuck-you American ego was completely parodied and made fun wholesale throughout the game? Or did you take this shit seriously as well?



Besides, the shitty America you described in the Fallout universe is completely fictionalized. The America in Fallout 3 on the other hand... People actually thought that way. People still think that way. And every single bit of it was repeatedly punched in the face with a reality check. I don't think '50s idealized American living ever took so many kicks to the nuts.

The "lost utopia" in Fallout 3 is a period of naive American unquestioning loyal citizens ignorant and unaware of the impending doom that they've brought upon themselves.

It's not the Fallout Old World that you know, a valid complaint, but Bethesda sure as fuck wasn't glorifying America with their game like you seem to think.

NOTE: This is all I wanted to point out. I'm not arguing that Bethesda's pre-war America was done better, just that Bethesda wasn't in anyway upholding the "American Way" or some shit.
 

Elementary - Dear Watson

RIP Eleuthera, I will miss you
Nov 9, 2010
2,980
0
0
Is that a rumour? Or do you have more than a feeling that it will be there?

I am from the UK... and all I know of Boston is that the people are the closest to Brits you can get, it had the best tasting harbour in the world and it is named after a horriffic town in Lincolnshire! :/
 

Eddie the head

New member
Feb 22, 2012
2,327
0
0
Ultratwinkie said:
I am not talking about satire. I am talking about the mentality of the NPCs that make no sense 200 years later.

The entirety of Fallout 3 was just people sitting around doing NOTHING but whine and complain about how their lives suck now that America isn't around. Regardless of the fact none of them would know anything about pre-war America.

Its like us sitting around talking about how American life sucks and how it was so much better under Roman rule if we didn't know who Romans were.

They didn't rebuild like the Californians did. They didn't start cultivating crops. They didn't start actual trade caravans.They did absolutely nothing for 200 years.

California was hit first, and had to deal with problems worse than DC ever did. What was the East Coast's excuse?
Did we play the same game? I don't remember this. I think they said some stuff about it was better before the bombs fell. Is that what you are talking about? Whats left of the american government is vilified to a hellish degree? They are concertedly not making the military look good. I'm sorry I just have no idea what you are talking about. Care to explain?
 

immortalfrieza

Elite Member
Legacy
May 12, 2011
2,336
270
88
Country
USA
I think that it won't really matter whether Bethesda or Obsidian makes the game, they're both smart enough to take a look at what New Vegas did and it's reception and incorporate what worked and what didn't into the next game, so it'll probably be good either way.

EDIT: Also, while I'm aware of it, I don't get this complaining about bugs in Bethesda and Obsidian games, the most I've ever seen is the occasional rock with part of the texture missing, that's it. Maybe it's because my computer is able to run the Fallout and Elder Scrolls games with plenty of computing power to spare, or I've been VERY lucky, I don't know.

As for the location, I'm hoping they aren't going for Boston. Why? It's just because it's not that well known of a location. I've never been anywhere near D.C. but I can take a look at the Lincoln Memorial or the Washington Monument in a game and know instantly what I'm looking at. I also know Vegas well enough despite never being within 500 miles of it to know it's largely about gambling and such, not to mention New Vegas' general western theme is something everybody knows. In short, they're locations just about anybody can identify with no matter where in the world they live, which is important because Fallout is intended to reach a worldwide audience, and that's easier to do if the game takes place in a location most have at least a passing knowledge of.

Boston? Not so much. I don't even have a clue what the place looks like, what kind of monuments it has if any, and pretty much the only event I can think of in history that's notable in Boston is the Boston Day Massacre, which is a pretty minor footnote when it comes to American history.

A place like Chicago or New York would probably work better, Chicago since the 50's mobster era would fit perfectly with Fallout's overall theme, while New York is a place with lots of identifiable landmarks, would be a place that probably would have been hit pretty heavily by the bombs, and both are pretty well known major U.S. cities in their own right.

This is under the assumption they'd stick to America of course, a place like London or Paris or somewhere like that would be good for a setting out of the good ol USofA, since they have yet to explain what the hell happened to the rest of the world in the 200 years since the apocalypse.
 

immortalfrieza

Elite Member
Legacy
May 12, 2011
2,336
270
88
Country
USA
Boudica said:
I'm pretty sick of "generic post-apocalyptic wasteland, set in generic U.S. like country."
Then stop playing Fallout games, because that^ is what the series is and always will be.