I mentioned this in another thread, but I know a guy who is hard-pressed on convincing everyone that we won the Vietnam War.
There's being positive through life and then there's the Secret positive. Saying you will get a car spot if you ask the universe. You will win lotto if you ask the universe. You will be supreme overlord if you're positive enough and ask the universe.qbert4ever said:Actually, while The Secret is more or less a work of fiction, it is based on fact. To use an example, if you go into a job interview, and you're pumped up and really positive that you're going to nail it, your body language is going to make you a better candidate then, say, a guy who goes in depressed, worried, and anxious. Hell, just look at emos. All they do is piss and moan about how their life sucks and what happens? Their life ends up sucking. It's not so much life will hand you nice things on a silver platter as it is nice things will be easier to gain if you keep positive.PurpleRain said:Gah, the ignorence of some hurts. Who's read or knows of The Secret. It's a book done by a bunch of people that believe how positive atoms attract other positive atoms, being positive (emotionally) will attract positive outcomes. This goes onto saying that the universe will give to you: money, power, car spots, etc, if you stay positive. Wow, just wow. They fail to realise that atoms and an emotion are two completely serprate things.
And yet it remains a communist country, how?Lord Krunk said:I mentioned this in another thread, but I know a guy who is hard-pressed on convincing everyone that we won the Vietnam War.
Oh, don't get me wrong, The Secret is nuttier then squirrel shit, I'm just saying that the general principle behind it, ie: think good things and you'll do alright, is true enough in itself.PurpleRain said:There's being positive through life and then there's the Secret positive. Saying you will get a car spot if you ask the universe. You will win lotto if you ask the universe. You will be supreme overlord if you're positive enough and ask the universe.
The Chasers had something to say on it as well:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usbNJMUZSwo
Samirat said:I was just about to say that. Why would you think it was a trillion miles away? That's like 1.5 hours at light speeds, larger than the breadth of our solar system by a long shot.cleverlymadeup said:first the moon is just under 400 000 km away, in under a week wouldn't be difficult
SmartAssery said:Actually at the point of Aphelion, Pluto is a little over 7 billion km away, taking approximately 6.8 hours for light from the sun to reach.
They're well-practiced at believing in things that can't logically exist. From that perspective, the paranoia over witchcraft makes a great deal of sense.Not quite directly related to this, but I still find it hilarious that the Catholic Church condemn the Harry Potter books for promoting witchcraft, despite the fact that witchcraft obviously doesn't exist!
Read Proverbs 26:4.thedrop2zer0 said:There is no doubt that what we have today is the preserved Word of God. Sir Frederick Kenyan, one of the greatest authorities in New Testament textural criticism has said this, "There is no fundamental doctrine of the Christian faith that rests on a disputed reading. It cannot be too strongly asserted that in substance, the text of the Bible is certain. Especially is the case with the New Testament. The number of manuscripts of the New Testament is so large that it is practically certain that the true reading of every doubtful passage is preserved in some form or another. This can be said of no other book in the world."
Also the fact most things writen then were done metaphoricly(spelling?). The entire turning water to wine could have been as easy as Jesus buying everyone wine. The people were poor and he was a king so it would make sense. We bought a book about all this stuff, but I haven't gotten around to reading it yet.Taxi Driver said:This of course is based on that fact that anyone capable of writing is incapable of misinterpreting events, exaggerating events, lying about events, writing in a manner that could easily be misinterpreted by readers, you get the point. There are too many variables in this equation to believe it is infallible.
Perhaps the best way to support the bible or your holy text of choice is not to assert and use the amount of full stops in your sentence as justification.thedrop2zer0 said:You're right about Him being a king, but He was not a king by our definition. He was not wealthy. He was a carpenter.PurpleRain said:Also the fact most things writen then were done metaphoricly(spelling?). The entire turning water to wine could have been as easy as Jesus buying everyone wine. The people were poor and he was a king so it would make sense. We bought a book about all this stuff, but I haven't gotten around to reading it yet.
1) once out of the gravitational pull of earth, there's no air to slow you down, so (in theory) you can accelerate exponentially, and (eventually) break lightspeed. SO, all they had to do was accelerate, not to lightspeed, but it got them there REALLY quick.TheNecroswanson said:I'll be honest, so do I. Not in a conspiricy sort of way, but more of an, it's a good trillion miles from us. How did they 1: Get there in the course of a week 2: why haven't we gone back and 3: We didn't actually have the technology to safely store a reproducing supply of oxygen until the later seventies early eighties. (I think we just really wanted to beat them ruskies.)werepossum said:She also beleives the moon landing was fake.