Large Hadron Collider Could Be World's First Time Machine

Recommended Videos

Andy of Comix Inc

New member
Apr 2, 2010
2,234
0
0
Maybe we should send a message back from the future saying, "Higgs singlet sounds fucking stupid, come up with a more dignified name please"
 

Xealeon

New member
Feb 9, 2009
106
0
0
BiscuitTrouser said:
Eugh. And how would 1941 POSSIBLY understand a message sent with an undetectable partical?
Are you telling me that you would send any of those messages to 1941? How would that accomplish anything even if they were able to receive them? They'd have to remember it for at least 38 years before it would be relevant.
 

godfist88

New member
Dec 17, 2010
700
0
0
xXxJessicaxXx said:
My money on Higgs singlet hitting Nostradamus right in the face. :D
that'd be hilarious, i could definitely picture that happening.

OT: if could send myself a message to the past it'd be along the lines of....

LAY OFF THE DAMN PORN, AND GET A LIFE. and tell your parents to invest in Google.
 

HandsomeJack

New member
Jul 17, 2009
120
0
0
I remember going through the physics dept of college and reading all the theories of time travel. All of them boil down to "Let's do a math equation and arbitrarily call it time travel" I have yet to see any of them with solid, credible explanations. My favorive was "If you travel around the circumference of an infinitly long cylinder." Mathematically it may pan out that the constant they infer to be time goes negative, but I have yet to see anyone in real life take 6 apples from 5 to make negative apples.

Not all math can be applied to the real world. A constant may truely represent a factor we have yet to identify or sometimes it is just how we fudge numbers to make them fit a trend (look at Imaginary Numbers for example)
 

Oilerfan92

New member
Mar 5, 2010
483
0
0
"oh look. A message from my future self. Lets look at what my future holds.....

http://path-of-power.com/i/forever_alone.png

But seriously. Even though I don't understand pretty much all of this. The basic point amazes me.
 

duchaked

New member
Dec 25, 2008
4,451
0
0
it's a cool prospect (cooler, but I'm so used to seeing it in movies and stuff) that's only used in movies and games as a device to drive the plot

but I don't think it'll happen in real life heh
 

ezeroast

New member
Jan 25, 2009
767
0
0
icyneesan said:
If I could send a message to myself in the past it would probably be along the lines of, "Masturbate more, play less video games"
funny, I think I must have sent that back to myself sometime ago....
 

megamabu

New member
Mar 2, 2011
34
0
0
Ranorak said:
Wait....

Does this mean it failed?
Because this thing is going to be turned on in the future, ergo we're currently in it's past and we haven't had any messages yet.

If we ever invent time travel, we'd know before we'd invent it. Cause we'd go back in time.
All in all, the big question remains, where the hell did the Song of Storms came from?!
Actually it does not necessarily mean it failed it means that the time that is now is not the time that scientists have decided to message who knows maybe they are planning to send a message in a year or maybe even a month or two in the future.
 

Cyberjester

New member
Oct 10, 2009
496
0
0
You've never heard of the Astronomers Brother problem? Very basic, very common in high school physics. How there's twins/brothers/whoever, one goes away in a space ship traveling near the speed of light, another stays on earth and sends messages at one a week. Astronomer is gone for 2 months, how many messages did s/he/it receive.

Answer, time is relative. Simply being in a jet at mach 2, or even a 747 is enough to slow time down for you.

Time machines exist, just not in the "Oh look I've gone back twenty gadzillion years" kind. And even if someone could build them, they wouldn't. Proving the evolution v creation debate would be too much.
 

BiscuitTrouser

Elite Member
May 19, 2008
2,860
0
41
Xealeon said:
BiscuitTrouser said:
Eugh. And how would 1941 POSSIBLY understand a message sent with an undetectable partical?
Are you telling me that you would send any of those messages to 1941? How would that accomplish anything even if they were able to receive them? They'd have to remember it for at least 38 years before it would be relevant.
I was talking about telling them hiter was insane and skipping the most part of the holocaust? Why isnt it relevent then... Maybe 3 years before in fact. Dunno why i chose the early-mid stages of the war.
 

dontlooknow

New member
Mar 6, 2008
124
0
0
I see how the Higgs singlet might be able to pass from one time to another, but how could we feasibly ensure that I makes it to a future or past human? Even if those boffins managed to invent a way to send it in a way they know it'll be received either in the past or the future, time and space are not absolute. If we send a message 50 years into the future, for example, planet earth, the sun and all of the solar system will have moved millions of miles away from our current location, which itself is can only measured relatively (with respect to our position in the galaxy, or our galaxy's position in the local group. How would that work?
 

Player Two

New member
Dec 20, 2010
56
0
0
Creating any kind of legible message, using particles that only theoretically exist and can only be observed via mathematics, is NOT EASY. Even if it were possible, at any indeterminate point IN the future, there is no way we can receive any kind of transmission at this time, and it's likely that if such technology ever develops, then the means of producing and receiving a signal will evolve at the same time. So please stop saying 'It's obviously not going to happen because we haven't got any time travel from the future yet'. It's "obviously not going to happen" because it is ridiculously complex quantum physics and you cannot possibly have any control over something when you cannot predict the outcomes of the system.
I don't think any kind of controllable time machine will ever exist. Perhaps, with great effort and the finest minds of their generation, they could observe a Higgs singlet passing from one point in time to another - but control it? Not a chance.
 

gl1koz3

New member
May 24, 2010
931
0
0
Of course, it implies that your past still exists after you've experienced it. To the future seems like something more plausible.
 

Chills41

New member
Mar 15, 2011
8
0
0
So... you can put something into a 5th dimension and from there it can move backwards and forwards in time,right?

What happens if it moves sideways? SUPERmindf***k.

But in all seriousness, I doubt time travel is possible due to the fact that time is always and will always move in one direction. Sure, time dilation is possible but until my textbook says that Hilter was assassinated by someone wearing a pink frilly tutu, I can safely say that time travel is impossible.
 

manic_depressive13

New member
Dec 28, 2008
2,617
0
0
That would be so epic! And the moment they perfect the device they receive a message and it says:
You've doomed us all
 

Blaster395

New member
Dec 13, 2009
514
0
0
Sending messages through time would be enough time travel that we would ever need. All we do is ask ourselves 100 years in the future for all the new scientific discoveries they have made, and repeat, for infinite science.