I hate all the new consoles equally.
With earlier cycles we could buy new machines and got nicer graphics, better sound, better everything.
Now if we do better graphics it's from the elite from the elitists AAA club, the people who search the broadest of audiences.
And then it will look just slightly better at best. It's entirely possible that these new graphics are used to get make games with even more gritty realism which would result in them looking actually worse.
But i can't hate the games before i see them, right? Well, i can hate the fact that companies expect me to pay 400 bucks to play new games that look, sound and play quite similar to the old ones (if we're lucky).
I don't really need new hardware to play new games, i got the hardware right here, it's my PC.
One might argue that the steam platform does some things similar to the hated Xbone features before they canceled them but i let steam get away with that because even if i take the inability to sell used games into account and buy only those games of which i am absolutely sure that i will play them for hundreds of hours and therefore get my money's worth (which i do) i will grow old and die before i have played every game that i'd play on steam. And they wont stop having new games on there for quite some time.
Also, there's the alternative of gog.com.
You could probably play games and just skip this entire console generation.
Another thing i do not like is the lack of backwards compatibility. In the olden days, we didn't have that, we had to buy adapters for the genesis/megadrive to play master system games and there was the super gameboy with which you could play gameboy games on the snes.
So now we have arrived at 20 years ago.
Wonderful.
Especially with Microsoft who boasted that the XBox one would be a device to take over the living room.
There's this other device that has a special function people often like to use and it was made by microsoft.
The xbox360 has a place in many living rooms and people who like to play the 360 games can not have the xbone "take over the living room!".
The statement was false anyways because you just can't make a device that does everything that every device in your living room does. Would be kinda hard to have any xbox play playstation games.
But if you make a statement that has been rendered false before you made it by a device made by your own company then i will not give you my money.
About the kinect: I threw many joypads away because they where unreliable. If Microsoft makes a kinect that reads 95% of my movements correctly it still wouldn't be good enough.
If it where, i'd still be reluctant because i'm lazy. Instead of flailing around and looking even more like an idiot i'd rather be pushing buttons.
About "social integration": Don't care. I'm getting the impression that executives are developing this medium right past me in a direction they assume today's "youth" is going.
You can't catch my attention with a "share" button with nebulous functions. Is this a record button that will record footage of my game onto the harddrive for later editing? Does it open up a menu in which i can choose from options like "post my score on facebook", "record my game for editing" or "host livestream"?
Is the "youth" going to fall for promises without knowing what those promises actually are? I hope not.
I hope people who think about buying on of the new consoles would demand more information first. Will i have to link up my social networking accounts with a mandatory console account?
Could be a problem, i have no facebook.
I actually read the license agreement there and was like "Nope!".
So the new consoles have better graphics but with the money that rendering anything costs for today's machines the better graphics will be even more exclusive to the biggest companies.
The new generation will also have many features that i don't need or want.
Frankly, i don't see the appeal of any of the new consoles.
With earlier cycles we could buy new machines and got nicer graphics, better sound, better everything.
Now if we do better graphics it's from the elite from the elitists AAA club, the people who search the broadest of audiences.
And then it will look just slightly better at best. It's entirely possible that these new graphics are used to get make games with even more gritty realism which would result in them looking actually worse.
But i can't hate the games before i see them, right? Well, i can hate the fact that companies expect me to pay 400 bucks to play new games that look, sound and play quite similar to the old ones (if we're lucky).
I don't really need new hardware to play new games, i got the hardware right here, it's my PC.
One might argue that the steam platform does some things similar to the hated Xbone features before they canceled them but i let steam get away with that because even if i take the inability to sell used games into account and buy only those games of which i am absolutely sure that i will play them for hundreds of hours and therefore get my money's worth (which i do) i will grow old and die before i have played every game that i'd play on steam. And they wont stop having new games on there for quite some time.
Also, there's the alternative of gog.com.
You could probably play games and just skip this entire console generation.
Another thing i do not like is the lack of backwards compatibility. In the olden days, we didn't have that, we had to buy adapters for the genesis/megadrive to play master system games and there was the super gameboy with which you could play gameboy games on the snes.
So now we have arrived at 20 years ago.
Wonderful.
Especially with Microsoft who boasted that the XBox one would be a device to take over the living room.
There's this other device that has a special function people often like to use and it was made by microsoft.
The xbox360 has a place in many living rooms and people who like to play the 360 games can not have the xbone "take over the living room!".
The statement was false anyways because you just can't make a device that does everything that every device in your living room does. Would be kinda hard to have any xbox play playstation games.
But if you make a statement that has been rendered false before you made it by a device made by your own company then i will not give you my money.
About the kinect: I threw many joypads away because they where unreliable. If Microsoft makes a kinect that reads 95% of my movements correctly it still wouldn't be good enough.
If it where, i'd still be reluctant because i'm lazy. Instead of flailing around and looking even more like an idiot i'd rather be pushing buttons.
About "social integration": Don't care. I'm getting the impression that executives are developing this medium right past me in a direction they assume today's "youth" is going.
You can't catch my attention with a "share" button with nebulous functions. Is this a record button that will record footage of my game onto the harddrive for later editing? Does it open up a menu in which i can choose from options like "post my score on facebook", "record my game for editing" or "host livestream"?
Is the "youth" going to fall for promises without knowing what those promises actually are? I hope not.
I hope people who think about buying on of the new consoles would demand more information first. Will i have to link up my social networking accounts with a mandatory console account?
Could be a problem, i have no facebook.
I actually read the license agreement there and was like "Nope!".
So the new consoles have better graphics but with the money that rendering anything costs for today's machines the better graphics will be even more exclusive to the biggest companies.
The new generation will also have many features that i don't need or want.
Frankly, i don't see the appeal of any of the new consoles.