Cliff_m85 said:
Pyromaniac1337 said:
Cliff_m85 said:
Pyromaniac1337 said:
FYI, universal health care=Good for everyone, because then EVERYONE GETS HEALTH CARE.
I think this is obvious.
Universal food providing = good for everyone, because everyone gets food.
The problem would be in who is providing anything, if they can actually provide it in a reasonable fashion, and if they won't be prone to corruption. Tell me honestly if you believe the government, who were beat badly by Walmart in terms of helping Hurricane Katrina victims, could provide this service or any other service that is 'universal' without corrupting it or fucking it up in some way.
Considering that Obama is nothing like Bush? Yes, I do believe that it is possible without it getting fucked up via corruption or other shit. Just look at Canada (FYI I am Canadian). Our universal health care works, it just needs to recover (like our military) from decades of Liberal funding cuts.
Wow, this is adorable! You think the president is the only one in charge. Awwww *pinches your cheek*. You're forgetting about Congress. Obama may be nothing like Bush, but Congress is everything like Congress.
Aw, how adorable! The little 6-year-old wants in on the big kids' discussion!
Y'know a little something, called "democracy"? That's where you elect representatives to a nationwide forum. In your case, to your Congress. Those representatives are also looked after by a certain organization you call the "Central Intelligence Agency", and another one you call the "Federal Bureau of Investigation", whose job it is to make sure your politicians aren't awarding illegal special favours.
Sure, there's corruption, but it's kept in check behind the scenes, and using it as an argument against Universal Health Care is ignoring the many levels of anti-corruption your government has in place. Again, I'm just gonna point at my own country, Canada, and OUR Universal Health Care, and how well it works (well, worked, until the Grits fucked it up).