Girlfriend finally got around to playing it. Came into my room gibbering about how much she loved it, which rapidly turned to shrieks of outrage when she discovered how long the wait would be between episodes.
Thorn14 said:"Lighthouse, the most erect of phallic symbols"
Well, he could be. That doesn't change the fact this sentence sounds incredibly stupid.Gundam GP01 said:Now I haven't played the game yet, but have you considered the possibility that maybe, just maybe, the character that said that is a bit of a snarky perv?
It comes from a polygon article and is said with a complete lack of any irony.Gundam GP01 said:Now I haven't played the game yet, but have you considered the possibility that maybe, just maybe, the character that said that is a bit of a snarky perv?ninja666 said:Thorn14 said:"Lighthouse, the most erect of phallic symbols"![]()
Is this seriously in the game? I don't know how perverted you'd have to be to see a dick in a fuckin' lighthouse. I think the writers are clearly trying too hard to be edgy.
I don't think it's nesecarly the game so much as it is this polygon article :http://www.polygon.com/2015/1/26/7880159/can-gamings-great-women-characters-be-written-by-menninja666 said:Thorn14 said:"Lighthouse, the most erect of phallic symbols"![]()
Is this seriously in the game? I don't know how perverted you'd have to be to see a dick in a fuckin' lighthouse. I think the writers are clearly trying too hard to be edgy.
Its the association. Like you know when you can't unsee Alucard having tiny cross eyes for the dots on his glasses.Gundam GP01 said:...Thorn14 said:It comes from a polygon article and is said with a complete lack of any irony.Gundam GP01 said:Now I haven't played the game yet, but have you considered the possibility that maybe, just maybe, the character that said that is a bit of a snarky perv?ninja666 said:Thorn14 said:"Lighthouse, the most erect of phallic symbols"![]()
Is this seriously in the game? I don't know how perverted you'd have to be to see a dick in a fuckin' lighthouse. I think the writers are clearly trying too hard to be edgy.
http://www.polygon.com/2015/1/26/7880159/can-gamings-great-women-characters-be-written-by-men
"The game begins in a moment of extreme peril for Caulfield. I might be going too far here, but I find it interesting that she is presented, not merely in trouble, but endangered by that most erect of phallic structures: a lighthouse. Make of that what you will."
Oh for fuck sake. I watched the scene they're talking about there in GiantBomb's quick look on the game and there's no line about lighthouses being phallic anywhere in that scene. It's not even a quote from the damn game, but from an article WRITING about the damn game.
Why does a single line from one of Polygon's writers of all people make you take the game less seriously? If anything, you should be taking Polygon less seriously for reading something about gender inequality or sexism into a scene that literally goes "Girl wakes up outside in a storm. Girl walks towards a familiar lighthouse. Girl sees a huge hurricane thing. Lighthouse breaks and falls on girl."
The main reason I hadn't already picked this up was Remember Me not being a particularly good game. Fantastic world building, but poor execution. It was the second to last thing I preordered -- the last was Witcher 3 (mostly because of the discount for having the other two).Rebel_Raven said:Got episode 1, played it, liked it, got the season pass.
I've been looking forward to this a while.
Prolly will replay it to get the stuff I missed later.
I just gotta wonder how much bullshit'll arise. "Oh,it didn't sell well! Female protagonists can't be done anymore coz they ruin the game, and the game won't sell!" I imagine it won't because it's not that well known about, but I still hope it does do well. The game's pretty charming.
Dontnod had a great world with Remember Me, but not that great on gameplay. This game lets them create a great world, and not have to rely so heavily on gameplay. Piecing things together, warping time, changing events, making choices, I'm eager to see what'll come of things.
ninja666 said:The game seems promising, but what I don't get is why literally everybody must imitate Telltale's shitty business model and release the game in pieces, so you have to pay outrageous prices to be able to play the whole thing. Either way, I think I'll play it in a year or five when they decide it's time to stop milking money from the customers and release the last "episode".
Understatement of the month. Cuz Teenage life is so hard man. Not only that, the number clichés breaks the current record for computer games that I know of so far.Adam Jensen said:It's a bit of a "Teen angst: The Game",.
Resident Evil Revelations 2 is apparently releasing an episode once a week for a month or so. Just felt the need to throw that out there.wulf3n said:I'm gonna go with this. I like the concept of episodic gaming, but in practice I just don't think they work quite yet. The wait between episodes is just too long and they can't resist the urge to leave every episode on a cliff-hanger.BloatedGuppy said:FUCKING EPISODIC GAMING.
I remember thinking "I would be so pissed right now if I had to wait several months to find out how this plays out" so many times when an episode of The Wolf Among Us finished.
This game seems right up my alley, but I'm going to wait until the entire season is released. Cue the next 6-12 months of carefully tip-toeing around every thread that so much as hints at the game so it doesn't get spoiled.