2xDouble said:
DanielDeFig said:
Why would anyone make a six-year old girl sing a song like that? I barely know anything about cheerleading (doesnt really exist outside USA), but it looked like the dance routines were toned down for six year-olds (Clapping ands and rotating 360), so why not the song?
And according to what logic was SHE kicked off when the mom complained? Hello? Some adults don't seem to get that kids are individuals separate from their parents (even if its their own kids).
EDIT:
Actually, can someone who's actually from the US explain to me why Americans go to the Media with their problems instead of authorities related to the problem. Sometimes, like this time, they seem to do both, but why go to the media at all? What is the purpose?
First of all:
DanielDeFig said:
I barely know anything about cheerleading
Secondly, watch the clip. The controversy started
because the mother went to the appropriate authorities, in this case the cheerleading coach (followed by the Parent Teacher Association, or PTA). Both of those authorities made bone-headed decisions. That caused a stir, which caused news and media outlets to latch on to this case that people felt so strongly about. Media (and more specifically news) investigators are more relentless than some law enforcement, are not bound by jurisdiction or limited in scale (i.e. only dealing with "big" problems), and are far more accessible (typically) than other authorities (such as the PTA). Surely you have "soccer moms" and "investigative journalism" in your country (even if you don't call them by those names, lets not get bogged down in semantics).
Does that make running first to the news media the right thing to do? No. Does that make the story any less disturbing? Absolutely not.
The cheer remains disturbing, i don't think ive seen a post here yet that disagrees with that. But you haven't quite answered my question fully. I agree that the media is more accessible, wherever you are, but i still don't understand what that mom hopes to achieve by contacting the media. There was another story here on the escapist about a mom being upset about a comic store selling old comics (that hadn't been checked well), that had adult content without the store manager knowing. She also went to the media to complain. I dont remember whether she complained to the manager as well, but if she already had, then why complain to the media as well, and if she hadn't, then why do that instead?
what im asking is: what do these moms hope to achieve by contacting the media? If you are already discussing the problem with the one responsible, then why bring the media in? And if you aren't, then why go to the media instead? They can't help either way, so if the person responsible refuses to discuss the problem or comply with your demands, then either accept that or (if you feel its important enough) find out who has the authority to look into the problem and help you.
I don't know if its a cultural thing, i don't know if its that they want to be on tv, i dont know if they aren't informed that there are higher authorities and organisations that can actually help them. I don't know why this seems to happen in a lot news stories in the US, but outside of the US the media usually catches on to these stories BECAUSE a higher authority was contacted, not because the individual contacted them.
sorry to be ranting here, mbe i should make a separate thread of this if i still don't get a clear answer.
OT: the cheer is still creepy as heck, and no six year old should have to sing it just because they want to be in a cheer leading team. And she especially shouldn't be kicked off just because her mother had a (completely valid) complaint.