i didn't say that they only eat from one source they do eat high leaves but not as often as lower ones, and just cause one scientist says something doesn't make it right, most modern scientist hold the neck as a weapon viewpointDecabo said:I don't know what's funnier, the fact that you got offended that I referenced someone extremely knowledgeable on the subject to disprove you, or the fact that you're suggesting giraffes can only eat from one food source. If it'll help unbunch your panties, let's just say it came from multiple sources.rafiqofthemany said:yeah well explain that to my evolution professor, while giraffes sometimes eat leaves from the top of the trees they mainly eat plants closer to the ground including during the dry season when leaves are harder to come by, on the other hand males who win in combat are more likely to mate and the male with the longer neck is more likely to winDecabo said:You have it backwards, giraffes evolved to reach the tops of the trees. Using it to find a mate is just a bonus. This is what Richard Dawkins said on the Colbert Report.rafiqofthemany said:actually giraffes have long necks to combat other males the leaves on trees is just a plus
In his defense, we pointed to the ICP song and asked him to "make us something like that", in which case he completely succeeded.pigmy wurm said:Although I have to say, this is not some of Bradly's best work, during it I thought you guys had just used a garage band loop or something off of an old Casio keyboard.
That's more or less the musical style of ICP...really can't be that great when the style you're emulating is lame to being with, no?theownerer said:sorry but the 'song' was pretty lame. Paul was just talking with music playing in the background. It got better and funnier when Graham came in but it still felt pretty weak.
Poor white kids. They've got that demographic eating out of their pasty, painted palms.LeeshaJoy said:Does anyone give a damn about ICP anymore? Did anyone ever give a damn about ICP?
I'm not sure if the wording there was intentional or not, but either way, we just got hit with a sick burn.bos1014 said:So please stick with stuff that your good at and stay out of the comedy business.
Haha, that's around what I was thinking. But it seems that it would mean: "Stick with what you're good at, and don't continue doing what you've been perfecting (to the elation of your fans) for some 5 years now," and that seems like an odd statement. Still, total burn.Matt_LRR said:I'm not sure if the wording there was intentional or not, but either way, we just got hit with a sick burn.bos1014 said:So please stick with stuff that your good at and stay out of the comedy business.
-m
Aw man, for a second I thought you were referencing the old Bill Nye "Speedwalker" sketch, and I got excited. Alas, that wouldn't actually relate at all... And almost no one has seen that sketch. I think it's on Youtube, though.TheDoctor455 said:Anyway... this would more be like if Bill Nye were still running, and they had just updated to rap.
Graham is better then ICP. I wouldn't worry about looking them up...Onyx Oblivion said:"I'm Graham! And I don't wanna put on makeup! WAH WAH WAH!"
Who the fuck is the Insane Clown Posse?
*goes to find out*
Now, this is just my personal belief, but I think that anyone who feels they have to refute science to believe in God just doesn't have a lot of faith in their belief. And anyone who feels they should refute God exclusively so that it doesn't interfere with their scientific beliefs doesn't, either.Strave said:Anyway, back to the topic - I'm a man of science but I still believe in God. And the Big Bang, in fact. Actually, I think the theory of the Big Bang meshes extremely well with the Bible. I just try not to take what's written in it too literally; there's many good lessons to be learned, though. Not that I have any problem with people of any other belief, including my many Atheist friends (such is the case on a college campus).