Interpretations can be wrong. I mean, the poem's clearly nothing to do with space travel, and all the creativity in the world wouldn't defend saying it was. For the most part, though, some interpretations can very much be more right than others.dkuch said:That is what I told her, but she is so fucking nuts and stupid that she said "No Dylan, you are wrong the poem is about what I said". No fucking lie.stone0042 said:That's actually complete and utter bullshit, who is your teacher to say what interpretation is correct? Often times even the author doesn't even know, and the poem is completely objectionable.dkuch said:I remember last year we got this poem "Nothing Gold Can Stay". I thought it meant something that different then what the teacher thought. It was the first time I had ever seen that poem and we had thirty minutes to look at it and write three paragraphs about it. So I though it was about the fall of a golden age or civilization because it mentioned stuff like garden of Eden and Atlantis. I gave a good theses and backed it up with supporting evidence. Then it turns out it was about the changing of seasons. So I thought "Hey I did what the paper told me to do, tell what you think it is and then support it with proof" Well I was wrong because the next week (The teacher was a lazy ****) I got it back with a C- stating that "You're interpretation was wrong". Last time I checked there is no "wrong" interpretation of a fucking poem. Sure the author may write it for a point he sees at the time, but why am I wrong for seeing it in a different light? It is like saying I was wrong for seeing the wrong end of an optical illusion.
In this case, you've understood that it's essentially about the beauty of youth and ageing to an inferior form. More strictly, it's about Spring turning into Summer, there's no reference to Autumn or Winter. With the mention of Eden and its connotations of innocent bliss, you might like to suggest it could refer to the beauty of an innocent child reaching jaded, knowing adulthood.
There is nothing in the poem to imply a civilisation: Eden has pretty much no literary connotation with civilisation. Secondly, most nations and cultures don't have their golden age right at the start of their existence, yet the poem clearly links golden with starts (dawn, first green, etc.) I would say your interpretation was a poor one (sorry!). I do sympathise that calling it flat "wrong" is unnecessarily harsh, and not taking a little more time to talk you through is very unhelpful.