No, that just quoted his involvement in his business and the hopes that it would bring a positive viewpoint to the Muslim faith; that has nothing to do with the motivations behind the murder.Klagermeister said:Actually, it did.Greever said:How does it have anything to do with him being Muslim? The article itself didn't even directly reference the correlation.psypherus said:Cutting off you wife's head isn't going to improve the world's view on muslims.
Muzzammil Hassan is the founder and chief executive officer of Bridges TV, which he launched in 2004, amid hopes that it would help portray Muslims in a more positive light.
ExactlyRebelRising said:The minute I saw "muslim" in the story, it was no longer "news" to me.
I'm sure if jerry falwel or billy grahm jr (sp on both) killed someone the fact that they were tied to christianity would be mentioned to. So I don't think it was "bad" reporting, just reporting info about a significant (apparently) member of that particular religious communityGreever said:The most interesting aspect of this story is the fact that the reporter did a horrible job of remaining objective and just reporting the news. A man murdering his wife for divorcing him really doesn't have anything to do with being a Muslim. Yes, he may have been a notable member of the local Muslim community, but does that really factor in to his motivation to kill his wife for divorce? Christians, Jews, and Atheists have never been involved in similar crimes?
The fact that he was a Muslim was probably the only reason this story was ran, not the horror of the actual murder. Congratulations to everyone that fed into the stereotype they spun this story with in order to hook you into reading.
I guess she'll be another one in the faceless crowd.Kriegsherr said:She'll never be the head of a major corporation
Humans are ridiculous.fullmetalangel said:It's not ridiculous, it's human.